Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Why Manhattan Borough President Wants to Kill the Drill

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Chris Jordan-Bloch:
Radioactive water being dumped into our rivers?

The recent New York Times investigation into the dangers posed to our air and water by fracking is a must-read. The meat of the investigation deals wi...

by Kathleen Sutcliffe:
We're Rolling Out The Red Carpet For 2 Oscar Nominees

As Oscar season enters full swing, two nominees are taking a break from the action in Hollywood to visit Washington, D.C. tomorrow (Thursday) and educ...

by Kathleen Sutcliffe:
Kids Speak Up On Fracking

A while back, I was invited to a D.C. elementary school to watch 5th graders deliver a presentation about drinking water. These students were proposi...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Kathleen Sutcliffe's blog posts
06 November 2009, 12:29 PM
Scott Stringer's constituents like their drinking water the way it is
Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer is known for firing on all cylinders—described by those who know him as having the stamina of the Energizer Bunny. Lately, he's turned his attention to the fact that the gas drilling industry is at New York's doorstep, clamoring for access to underground reserves and demanding the right to blast millions of gallons of chemically-treated water into the earth to extract the gas. We caught up with Borough President Stringer and asked him a few questions about his round-the-clock work on this pressing environmental concern.

Q: Why should New York City residents care about gas drilling? Isn't all this industrial activity going on far beyond the city boundaries?
A: This natural gas drilling proposed for the Marcellus Shale would directly affect the drinking water supply for 9 million New York City residents. 9 million! What's more, the City's upstate watershed right now is completely unfiltered. This is pure, clean, untainted drinking water. If the state allows drilling in the Catskill / Delaware watershed, it is a near certainty that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency would require the construction of a water filtration plant. That plant would cost an estimated $10-20 billion to build, and nearly $1 million per day just to operate. On top of the economic impact, there could also be a significant environmental impact. If hydraulic fracturing is permitted in the Marcellus Shale, it could lead to pollution, chemical spills, and contamination of the City's water supply. It has in at least 9 other states where this kind of drilling is permitted to take place; check out the report my office issued back in February on this called "Uncalculated Risk." So is it worth the widespread environmental and health risks to contaminate pristine drinking water? I don't think so. That's why we need to "Kill the Drill."

Q: You've named your campaign 'Kill the Drill.' You sound serious about this. What's the game plan and how do people get involved?
A: At the outset of this campaign, I realized that we needed a strong name to convey the importance of this issue. I mean, this is the biggest environmental issue of the decade in New York. So what we have done is to create a coalition of concerned citizens, environmental groups and elected officials who are all working together under the banner of "Kill the Drill" to convince the State Department of Environmental Conservation [DEC] to ban hydraulic fracturing. Anyone can get involved by visiting our website, where they will find information on how to join our letter-writing campaign and Facebook group. And for anyone in the New York City area on November 10th, we are holding a rally and press conference ahead of the 6:30 p.m. DEC hearing on the proposed drilling. This will be the only opportunity that New York City residents will have to make their voices heard on the issue, so it's really important that we get a huge turnout.

Q: How have your efforts been received? Do city residents seem supportive? How about other elected officials?
A: Our coalition is growing by the day. Concerned citizens, environmental advocacy groups like the Natural Resources Defense Council, NYH2O and Earthjustice, newspaper editorial pages, and elected officials all stand united in the view that the State's draft Environmental Impact Statement issued at the end of September fails to do enough to protect New York City's drinking water. Some of the elected officials who have joined us in calling for an immediate ban on natural gas drilling in the City's watershed include Congressmembers Carolyn B. Maloney, Jerrold Nadler, Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum, Public Advocate-elect Bill de Blasio, Queens Borough President Helen M. Marshall, State Senators Tom K. Duane, Liz Krueger and Daniel L. Squadron, Assemblymembers Jonathan L. Bing, James F. Brennan, Jeffrey Dinowitz, Deborah J. Glick, Richard N. Gottfried, Brian Kavanagh, Micah Z. Kellner, Rory I. Lancman and Linda B. Rosenthal, Councilmembers Gale A. Brewer, Leroy Comrie, Daniel R. Garodnick, James F. Gennaro, Jessica S. Lappin, Melissa Mark-Viverito and Rosie Mendez, City Councilmember-elect Margaret Chin, and several Manhattan Community Boards.

Q: How does New York's fight fit into the national effort to close the Halliburton loophole and repeal the Safe Drinking Water Act exemption for the gas drilling industry?
A: I think the efforts are complimentary. The specific goals are different because our goals are local. However, we know from the work that Earthjustice did earlier this year that the State DEC relied heavily on the EPA's 2004 analysis, which in my opinion was more of a political document, edited at the behest of former Vice President Dick Cheney, rather than a scientific document. In fact, an EPA whistleblower called the EPA's analysis that prompted the current Safe Drinking Water Act exemption "scientifically unsound." I think that if you look at the efforts of the Kill the Drill coalition, together with the recent statements about potential drinking water contamination made by the natural gas industry, it sends a powerful message to the federal government, and the EPA in particular, that a more serious and scientifically grounded examination on the effects of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water supplies is urgently needed.

Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
omegle sohbet

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.