Living withThe Little Blue Run coal ash impoundment is the largest unlined coal ash pond in the country, spanning two states and bordering a third. Next to the impoundment, residents are living with gushing leaks of contaminated water.
>
An Ill Wind
"You flip on a light switch.
That power is not coming from that light switch—that power is generated somewhere else. And it impacts people."
The Moapa River Indian Reservation, tribal home of a band of Paiute Indians, sits about 30 miles north of Las Vegas—and about 300 yards from the coal ash landfills of the Reid Gardner Power Station.
Fighting Back Against Coal Ash
On World Water Day in 2012, residents of Asheville, North Carolina came together to protect their waters from coal ash. The toxic stew of pollutants that can cause birth defects, cancer and organ damage, has already polluted many waterways.
Legal Fight For Long Overdue Coal Ash Protections
Earthjustice is representing 11 environmental and public health groups in a lawsuit to force the U.S. EPA to complete its rulemaking process and finalize public health safeguards against toxic coal ash.
Case Details | Complaint | Press Release | Blog Post
Toxic Coal Ash Problem at Colstrip in Montana
Earthjustice filed an appeal with Montana’s Board of Environmental Review on behalf of conservation groups, claiming that the state is doing little to nothing to address decades of groundwater pollution from Colstrip’s waste tailings ponds. Sludge ponds holding toxic coal ash waste from the Colstrip power plant were first discovered to be leaking nearly a decade ago.
Coal ash disposal sites may be closer than you realize. Explore fact sheets by state and known cases of contamination and spills.
In response to FOIA requests, EPA has revealed the existence of more than 1,000 coal ash dump sites across the country. Find out where they are.
Coal ash commonly contains some of the world’s deadliest toxicants that can cause cancer and neurological damage.
The toxic pollutants in coal ash have the potential to injure all major organ systems, damage physical health and development—and contribute to mortality.
Everyday, communities across the United States are bearing the true impacts of toxic coal ash pollution. See some of their stories:
The tribal home of a band of Paiute Indians sits about 30 miles north of Las Vegas—and about 300 yards from the coal ash landfills of the Reid Gardner Power Station.
The Little Blue Run coal ash impoundment is the largest unlined coal ash pond in the country, spanning two states (West Virginia and Pennsylvania) and bordering a third (Ohio).
No federal standards exist to regulate how coal ash is disposed or recycled. Follow Earthjustice's ongoing work for federally enforceable safeguards in the series, Tr-Ash Talk.
Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2010, the EPA proposed the first ever federal regulation of coal ash. The agency proposed two options: one offers a groundbreaking solution to closing and monitoring leaking toxic coal ash dumps, while the other perpetuates the status quo.
EPA has yet to act on the final rule.

Final Comments on EPA's Proposed Rule
In a 230-page comment letter to the EPA, Earthjustice and its partners clearly demonstrated that the EPA must choose the option to regulate coal ash as a "special waste" under subtitle C, with federally enforceable minimum standards applicable in every state.
S. 3512
This dangerous bill would have permanently prohibited the EPA from ever setting federal coal ash protections, posing a significant threat to communities living near coal ash sites.
S. 3512 is bad for jobs, the economy and recycling. Although the bill purports to support recycling and jobs, it actually hurts both. See how.

H.R. 2273
Introduced by Rep. David McKinley (R-WV), H.R. 2273 endangers public health and the safety of thousands of communities by failing to regulate coal ash as hazardous waste.
The bill would ignore the nearly half million citizen comments on the EPA's proposed rule and immediately undermine federal efforts to clean up these toxic dump sites.
Comparison of Coal Ash Regulation under Four Regulatory Schemes
A comparison chart analyzes the presence or absence of regulatory requirements under four different regulatory schemes:
1. EPA's proposed subtitle C (special waste) rule;
2. EPA's proposed subtitle D (nonhazardous waste) rule;
3. H.R. 2273 / S. 1751; and
4. S. 3512.
Analysis from Earthjustice and its partners have documented the growing public health threat from coal ash:
An exhaustive review of state regulations in 37 states, which together comprise over 98% of all coal ash generated nationally.
Leaking coal ash sites across the country are documented sites for hexavalent chromium—a toxic carcinogen— contamination in groundwater.