What Does the 2012 Election Mean for the Environment?

In the wake of superstorm Sandy, the 2012 election represents a critical moment for the environment. President Obama's re-election makes it clear that the people of this country will not sacrifice the right to a healthy environment in exchange for big profits for big polluters. Join Earthjustice President Trip Van Noppen and VP of Policy and Legislation Martin Hayden as they review election results, assess the impact on our work, and answer questions from Earthjustice supporters.
Place in Right Column
Voters Tell Obama: Get To Work On Clean Energy Future
Sandy Staggers East Coast -- And Climate Deniers
Trip's Column
Trip's Column
Trip Van Noppen
Martin Hayden

With the effects of climate change already being felt around the globe and corporate money influencing policy, the election of November 2012 represents a critical moment for the environment.

In a teleconference held a few days after the election, Earthjustice President Trip Van Noppen and Vice President of Policy and Legislation Martin Hayden reviewed election results, assessed the impact on Earthjustice's work, and answered questions from Earthjustice supporters. The discussion was moderated by National Press Secretary Kari Birdseye.

Recorded:  November 9, 2012
[ Download MP3 ]

Related:

President Obama addresses Madison, WI on the election trail. (Scout Tufankjian)
Trip's Column
Voters Tell Obama: Get To Work On Clean Energy Future

The President must unite America to secure prosperity and fight climate change.

Lower Manhattan was without power for days. (Eric Konon)
Trip's Column
Sandy Staggers East Coast—And Climate Deniers

The superstorm blows climate change onto national ballot.

NOAA satellite photo of superstorm Sandy.
On Our Blog
Superstorm Sandy: Spawn of Climate Change?

The effects are clear, if not the cause, says L.A. Times.

URL: http://earthjustice.org/features/what-does-the-2012-election-mean-for-the-environment