Grizzly bears still need our help

What's At Stake

Since coming into office, the Trump administration has taken several actions that strip away critical protections for imperiled species, like the iconic grizzly bear. These actions, coupled with a proposed Fish and Wildlife Service rule that shrinks grizzlies’ protected range and allows for increased killing of bears, could jeopardize grizzly recovery in the lower-48 states.  

Here at Earthjustice, we are ready to defend grizzly bears and advocate for their lasting recovery.  

Once roaming from the Pacific to the Great Plains, grizzly bears were hunted to near extinction and now occupy only four percent of their historic range.  In 1975, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed this population of bears under the Endangered Species Act to save them from disappearing forever. These federal protections have been essential in fostering the slow recovery of grizzlies, however new threats have emerged that threaten their full recovery. States in grizzly country have adopted regressive anti-carnivore policies and allow for rampant human development in grizzly habitat, placing new stressors on the bear population.  

2024 emerged as the deadliest year for bears in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem since they were listed under the Endangered Species Act. Nearly every bear that died was killed directly by humans or after being trapped in manmade infrastructure. Now, the Fish and Wildlife Service is considering a rule that would shrink grizzly bears’ protected range and allow for more management killing and even trophy hunts of grizzlies. 

This proposed rule for grizzly bears comes in addition to several actions the Trump administration has already taken that will make matters worse for grizzlies.  The administration has already proposed a rule that would weaken the bedrock environmental law that grizzlies need to make a lasting recovery: the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This rule would rescind the decades-old  definition of “harm” that includes  habitat modification or destruction that kills or injures wildlife by impairing their ability to breed, feed, or shelter. 

The Trump administration also plans to expedite logging and mining, while diminishing or even waiving Endangered Species Act considerations for these same projects.  These actions would pave the way for extractive industries to destroy the habitats where  protected species like grizzly bears live. Each of these actions threatens substantial harm to grizzly bears by eliminating, bypassing, or steamrolling over habitat protections long guaranteed under the ESA. We need your help to stop these plans and urge the Department of Interior to consider the latest science and conservation practices to ensure grizzly bear recovery.  

A pair of grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park (Todaysfotos / Shutterstock)
A pair of grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park. (Todaysfotos / Shutterstock)

Delivery to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Important Notice

Your message is delivered to a public agency, and all information submitted may be placed in the public record. Do not submit confidential information.

By taking action, you will receive emails from Earthjustice. Change your mailing preferences or opt-out at any time. Learn more in our Privacy Policy. This Earthjustice action is hosted on EveryAction. Learn about EveryAction’s Privacy Policy.

Why is a phone number or prefix required on some action forms?

Trouble Viewing This Action?

If the action form is not loading above, please add earthjustice.org as a trusted website in your ad blocker or pause any ad blockers, and refresh this webpage. (Details.) If the action form still does not display, please report the problem to us at action@earthjustice.org. Thank you!

Your Actions Matter

Your messages make a difference, even if we have leaders who don't want to listen. Here's why.

You level the playing field.

Elected officials pay attention when they see that we are paying attention. Read more.

They may be hearing from industry lobbyists left and right, but hearing the stories of their constituents — that’s your power.

Our legislators serve at the pleasure of the people who gave them their job — you.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. When you contact your elected official, you’re putting a face and a name on an issue.

Whether or not you voted for them, they work for you, for the duration of their term.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. (Find your local, state, and federal elected officials.)

Your action is with us in court.

If a federal agency finalizes a harmful action, the record of public comments provides a basis for bringing them into court. Read more.

Throughout each of the public comment periods we alert you to, Earthjustice’s attorneys are researching and writing in-depth, technical comments to submit — detailing how the regulation could and should be stronger to protect the environment, our communities, and our planet.

We need you to join us — your specific experiences, knowledge, and voice are crucial to add to the Administrative Record through the comment periods.

Lawsuits we file that challenge weak or harmful federal regulations rely on what was submitted during the comment period. The court can only look at documents that are in the Administrative Record — including the public comments — to decide if the agency did something improper.

Your actions aid our litigation. Taking action and submitting comments during a comment period is substantively important.

It’s the law.

Federal agencies must pause what they’re doing and ask for — and consider — your comment. Read more.

Many of us may have never heard of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but laws like these require our government to ask the public to weigh in before agencies adopt or change regulations.

Regulations essentially describe how federal agencies will carry out laws — including decisions that could undermine science, or weaken safeguards on public health.

Public comments are collected at various points throughout the federal government’s rulemaking process, including when a regulation is proposed and finalized. (Learn about the rulemaking process.) These comments become part of the official, legal public record — the “Administrative Record.”

When the public responds with a huge outpouring of support for environmental protections, these individual messages collectively undercut politicians' attempts to claim otherwise.

What this means is each of us can take a role in shaping the rules our government creates — and ensuring those rules are fair and effective.