Grizzly bears still need our help

What's At Stake

Grizzly bears need our help. The Trump administration is proposing to hand over management of grizzly bears to states hostile to their existence. This would make it easier for Northern Rockies states to relocate or kill grizzly bears. While grizzly bears will technically keep their Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing for now, the Trump administration’s proposal functions as a backdoor delisting.  

There is a comment period open until August 17th, and we need your voice. Send a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service urging them to keep grizzlies protected. 

Grizzly bears play a critical role in Northern Rockies ecosystems as a keystone species. They help to regulate prey species, which prevents overgrazing and maintains a balanced ecosystem. They also disperse seeds, often over large distances, promoting plant diversity. Once roaming from the Pacific to the Great Plains, grizzly bears were hunted to near extinction and now occupy only six percent of their historical range.   Losing a keystone species like the grizzly is akin to a home losing its foundation – it is felt throughout the entire ecosystem. 

In announcing the management change, Secretary Burgum and Northern Rockies governors focused on grizzly bear numbers to claim that the species is recovered, but recovery is about more than population size. While federal ESA protections have been essential in fostering the slow recovery of grizzlies, new threats have emerged that could reverse that progress. Even with federal protections, 2025 was the deadliest year for grizzlies to date. Only a handful of those deaths were attributed to natural causes, while 88% were caused by humans.  

Threats to the grizzly bear are only increasing under this administration, including through the proposed recission of the Roadless Rule, which would reduce grizzly bear habitat, and redefinition of what constitutes as ‘harm’ under the Endangered Species Act. Despite these threats, the administration is bowing to political pressure to reduce grizzly protections.  

If this proposal is finalized, the fate of this iconic species would largely be controlled by states in grizzly country — Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming — whose elected officials ignore best-available science in their statewide policies. These states’ desire to take control of grizzly bear management is largely fueled by plans to reduce grizzly bear populations, potentially through trophy hunting of grizzly bears. This is a disaster waiting to happen. 

Here at Earthjustice, we have a long history of defending the grizzly bear, and we need you on our side. If the Trump administration finalizes this lethal proposal, we’ll see them in court.  

Send a letter to the Fish and Wildlife Service today.  

A pair of grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park (Todaysfotos / Shutterstock)
A pair of grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park. (Todaysfotos / Shutterstock)

21 Days Remain

Delivery to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Important Notice

Your message is delivered to a public docket, and all information submitted may be placed in the public record. Do not submit confidential information.

By taking action, you will receive emails from Earthjustice. Change your mailing preferences or opt-out at any time. Learn more in our Privacy Policy. This Earthjustice action is hosted on EveryAction. Learn about EveryAction’s Privacy Policy.

Why is a phone number or prefix required on some action forms?

Trouble Viewing This Action?

If the action form is not loading above, please be aware that ad blockers and VPNs may prevent the action form from displaying. Please add earthjustice.org as a trusted website in your ad blocker, and refresh this webpage. (Details.) If the action form still does not display, please report the problem to us at action@earthjustice.org with a screenshot image of the problem. Thank you!

Your Actions Matter

Your messages make a difference, even if we have leaders who don't want to listen. Here's why.

You level the playing field.

Elected officials pay attention when they see that we are paying attention. Read more.

They may be hearing from industry lobbyists left and right, but hearing the stories of their constituents — that’s your power.

Our legislators serve at the pleasure of the people who gave them their job — you.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. When you contact your elected official, you’re putting a face and a name on an issue.

Whether or not you voted for them, they work for you, for the duration of their term.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. (Find your local, state, and federal elected officials.)

Your action is with us in court.

If a federal agency finalizes a harmful action, the record of public comments provides a basis for bringing them into court. Read more.

Throughout each of the public comment periods we alert you to, Earthjustice’s attorneys are researching and writing in-depth, technical comments to submit — detailing how the regulation could and should be stronger to protect the environment, our communities, and our planet.

We need you to join us — your specific experiences, knowledge, and voice are crucial to add to the Administrative Record through the comment periods.

Lawsuits we file that challenge weak or harmful federal regulations rely on what was submitted during the comment period. The court can only look at documents that are in the Administrative Record — including the public comments — to decide if the agency did something improper.

Your actions aid our litigation. Taking action and submitting comments during a comment period is substantively important.

It’s the law.

Federal agencies must pause what they’re doing and ask for — and consider — your comment. Read more.

Many of us may have never heard of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but laws like these require our government to ask the public to weigh in before agencies adopt or change regulations.

Regulations essentially describe how federal agencies will carry out laws — including decisions that could undermine science, or weaken safeguards on public health.

Public comments are collected at various points throughout the federal government’s rulemaking process, including when a regulation is proposed and finalized. (Learn about the rulemaking process.) These comments become part of the official, legal public record — the “Administrative Record.”

When the public responds with a huge outpouring of support for environmental protections, these individual messages collectively undercut politicians' attempts to claim otherwise.

What this means is each of us can take a role in shaping the rules our government creates — and ensuring those rules are fair and effective.