Oceanic whitetip sharks need additional protections

21,546

Supporters spoke up in this action

Delivery to National Marine Fisheries Service

Action ended on September 16, 2024

What Happens Next

Thank you to all who took action! We’re grateful for your support.

What Was At Stake

Oceanic whitetip sharks were once one of the most abundant sharks in the ocean. Sadly, due to overfishing, the global population has plummeted by 80-99% over the past 60 years and is teetering toward extinction.

The National Marine Fisheries Service has proposed a rule that would give oceanic whitetip sharks additional protections under the Endangered Species Act, but the federal agency needs to hear from you by September 15.

Unsustainable industrial fishing is one of the main culprits for oceanic whitetip shark deaths. Fishing fleets that use gear like pelagic longlines (comprised of dozens of miles of fishing lines dangling thousands of baited hooks) and purse seines (giant nets used to surround entire schools of tuna and other fish) are especially deadly for oceanic whitetips.

While fisheries regulations prohibit many federally managed fishing fleets in the U.S. from intentionally catching and keeping oceanic whitetip sharks, they still allow some fisheries to catch them. In addition, oceanic whitetips are also threatened by excessive bycatch — i.e. being caught, injured, and sometimes killed by fishing gear used to catch other species, like tuna. Once caught, a shark may struggle for hours and die. Even if it is released alive, it may die later from stress, infection, or injury.

Even though oceanic whitetips have been listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act since 2018, that law does not automatically protect threatened species from being caught, injured, or harassed. It also doesn’t prohibit people from selling or buying parts of threatened species like fins, teeth, or meat.

Recognizing that fishing and trade are still a major threat to this species, the Fisheries Service is considering stronger protections for oceanic whitetip sharks.

The proposed rule — called a “4(d) rule” after a section of the Endangered Species Act — would protect oceanic whitetips from the main threats that have led to their decline.

This extra protection is needed for these sharks to survive. Tell the Fisheries Service to finalize this rule as soon as possible and take all necessary steps within its power to ensure the recovery of the oceanic whitetip shark.

The oceanic whitetip shark’s population has crashed by 80-95% since the 1990s.
The oceanic whitetip shark’s population has 80-99% over the past 60 years. Earthjustice sued to protect them from overfishing, and as a result NOAA instituted gear restrictions that help to limit the catch of this species. (Kaikea Nakachi)

Your Actions Matter

Your messages make a difference, even if we have leaders who don't want to listen. Here's why.

You level the playing field.

Elected officials pay attention when they see that we are paying attention. Read more.

They may be hearing from industry lobbyists left and right, but hearing the stories of their constituents — that’s your power.

Our legislators serve at the pleasure of the people who gave them their job — you.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. When you contact your elected official, you’re putting a face and a name on an issue.

Whether or not you voted for them, they work for you, for the duration of their term.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. (Find your local, state, and federal elected officials.)

Your action is with us in court.

If a federal agency finalizes a harmful action, the record of public comments provides a basis for bringing them into court. Read more.

Throughout each of the public comment periods we alert you to, Earthjustice’s attorneys are researching and writing in-depth, technical comments to submit — detailing how the regulation could and should be stronger to protect the environment, our communities, and our planet.

We need you to join us — your specific experiences, knowledge, and voice are crucial to add to the Administrative Record through the comment periods.

Lawsuits we file that challenge weak or harmful federal regulations rely on what was submitted during the comment period. The court can only look at documents that are in the Administrative Record — including the public comments — to decide if the agency did something improper.

Your actions aid our litigation. Taking action and submitting comments during a comment period is substantively important.

It’s the law.

Federal agencies must pause what they’re doing and ask for — and consider — your comment. Read more.

Many of us may have never heard of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but laws like these require our government to ask the public to weigh in before agencies adopt or change regulations.

Regulations essentially describe how federal agencies will carry out laws — including decisions that could undermine science, or weaken safeguards on public health.

Public comments are collected at various points throughout the federal government’s rulemaking process, including when a regulation is proposed and finalized. (Learn about the rulemaking process.) These comments become part of the official, legal public record — the “Administrative Record.”

When the public responds with a huge outpouring of support for environmental protections, these individual messages collectively undercut politicians' attempts to claim otherwise.

What this means is each of us can take a role in shaping the rules our government creates — and ensuring those rules are fair and effective.