Restore protections for Northern Rockies wolves

What's At Stake

The gray wolf species in the Northern Rockies has faced its most severe threat in a century. While an Earthjustice lawsuit recently restored protections for wolves in 44 states, due to a series of administrative and legislative maneuvers over the past decade, wolves remain unprotected in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and portions of several adjacent states. We are calling for federal Endangered Species Act protections for wolves in the Northern Rockies. 

In Montana alone, more than 250 wolves have been killed statewide since the hunting and trapping seasons opened in the fall. In Idaho, data shows that over 310 wolves were killed statewide from the start of the season in the fall through the beginning of February, but many more have likely been killed since. 

It is time to reinstate federal Endangered Species Act protections for the Northern Rockies’ gray wolves who have suffered too long under hostile state management. These impacts have been exacerbated by aggressive wolf-killing legislation passed last year in Montana and Idaho. These new laws aggressively expand how, when, and where wolves can be trapped, snared, and killed regardless of consequences to wolves and other species. In Idaho, we have filed suit on behalf of thirteen conservation groups to fight back against the expansive wolf trapping that also captures, injures, and kills federally protected grizzly bears and Canada lynx.

The Northern Rockies’ states are not alone in their hostility toward wolves.  This past September, Earthjustice represented six Ojibwe tribes challenging Wisconsin’s wolf hunt. The Ojibwe people have numerous bonds with the gray wolf, or ma’iingan, including through their creation story. The Ojibwe people understand that ma’iingan needs time to reestablish its place upon the landscape and believe that what happens to ma’iingan happens to the Ojibwe. The agencies that allow these brutal wolf hunts demonstrate a lack of respect for these Indigenous peoples who have unique spiritual relationships with the gray wolf. Because of our recent lawsuit that restored protections for the species in 44 states, Wisconsin’s wolves are safe once again.

The erosion of this keystone species is detrimental to ecosystem health. They sit at the top of the food chain and make sure that populations of their prey (and their prey’s prey) remain at healthy levels. When wolves were driven to near extinction, negative side effects cascaded down the food chain, upsetting delicate ecological balances. During a biodiversity crisis, wolves are a necessary keystone species whose presence helps the entire ecosystem.

Interior Secretary Haaland recently wrote about the importance of wolf recovery efforts, so we need your help to urge her to put these words into action and relist gray wolves in the Northern Rockies with federal protections now!  

A wolf at Yellowstone National Park
(Jacob W. Frank / National Park Service)

Delivery to Sec. Haaland, Department of the Interior

Important Notice

Your message is delivered to a public agency, and all information submitted may be placed in the public record. Do not submit confidential information.

By taking action, you will receive emails from Earthjustice. Change your mailing preferences or opt-out at any time. Learn more in our Privacy Policy. This Earthjustice action is hosted on EveryAction. Learn about EveryAction’s Privacy Policy.

Why is a phone number or prefix required on some action forms?

Trouble Viewing This Action?

If the action form is not loading above, please add as a trusted website in your ad blocker or pause any ad blockers, and refresh this webpage. (Details.) If the action form still does not display, please report the problem to us at Thank you!

Your Actions Matter

Your messages make a difference, even if we have leaders who don't want to listen. Here's why.

You level the playing field.

Elected officials pay attention when they see that we are paying attention. Read more.

They may be hearing from industry lobbyists left and right, but hearing the stories of their constituents — that’s your power.

Our legislators serve at the pleasure of the people who gave them their job — you.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. When you contact your elected official, you’re putting a face and a name on an issue.

Whether or not you voted for them, they work for you, for the duration of their term.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. (Find your local, state, and federal elected officials.)

Your action is with us in court.

If a federal agency finalizes a harmful action, the record of public comments provides a basis for bringing them into court. Read more.

Throughout each of the public comment periods we alert you to, Earthjustice’s attorneys are researching and writing in-depth, technical comments to submit — detailing how the regulation could and should be stronger to protect the environment, our communities, and our planet.

We need you to join us — your specific experiences, knowledge, and voice are crucial to add to the Administrative Record through the comment periods.

Lawsuits we file that challenge weak or harmful federal regulations rely on what was submitted during the comment period. The court can only look at documents that are in the Administrative Record — including the public comments — to decide if the agency did something improper.

Your actions aid our litigation. Taking action and submitting comments during a comment period is substantively important.

It’s the law.

Federal agencies must pause what they’re doing and ask for — and consider — your comment. Read more.

Many of us may have never heard of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but laws like these require our government to ask the public to weigh in before agencies adopt or change regulations.

Regulations essentially describe how federal agencies will carry out laws — including decisions that could undermine science, or weaken safeguards on public health.

Public comments are collected at various points throughout the federal government’s rulemaking process, including when a regulation is proposed and finalized. (Learn about the rulemaking process.) These comments become part of the official, legal public record — the “Administrative Record.”

When the public responds with a huge outpouring of support for environmental protections, these individual messages collectively undercut politicians' attempts to claim otherwise.

What this means is each of us can take a role in shaping the rules our government creates — and ensuring those rules are fair and effective.