Tell California’s leaders to fund electric transportation, not big polluters

What's At Stake

California is spending billions in one of its major climate program on dirty combustion fuels. It just doesn’t make sense. Adding insult to injury, Governor Newsom is proposing to cut or delay hundreds of millions of dollars from critical zero-emissions programs in the next state budget. We can’t keep giving billions away to fossil fuels and dirty combustion in the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Help us convince the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and Governor Newsom to change course.

The LCFS was built in 2009, back when we still believed corn oil and other crops were the solution to our transportation problems. It works by requiring producers of higher-carbon fuels, like oil refineries, to direct money to producers of fuels that are supposedly lower in carbon. But in practice, the LCFS program funnels most of its 3 to 4 billion in revenues each year to benefit some of the most polluting fuels: crop-based biofuels that have been linked to deforestation of the Amazon, and biogas from large factory farms. These fuels are undermining our climate goals while enriching the state’s largest polluters, including oil and gas companies, and industrial dairies that worsen the air quality crisis in communities that are already facing concentrated levels of pollution. 

CARB knows this – it heard it from Earthjustice supporters like you during the last comment period and at the public hearing it hosted – yet it still failed to accept the reality that combustion fuels, no matter how they are produced, are not a climate or air quality solution. 

It’s urgent that CARB reverses course and reforms the program because, unlike in 2009, we have the zero-emissions technology we need to replace combustion entirely. LCFS revenue should go towards electrifying solutions like public transit agencies and school buses — not towards the industry’s pet projects and false solutions. Tell CARB and Governor Newsom it’s time to reform the program for a zero-emissions future. 

One of the reasons the LCFS provides lopsided subsidies to the oil and gas industry’s biofuels projects is that it doubles down on combustion fuels as means to solve California’s air quality crisis. California has admitted that we cannot meet federal, health-based air quality standards with further combustion. Further exacerbating the issue, transportation investments that reduce air pollution by pulling cars off the road or removing combustion entirely do not get preferential treatment under the LCFS. If Governor Newsom reworks the program to advance real zero-emission solutions that will deliver major benefits for California’s air quality.

Ploughing 80% of LCFS revenue into combustion fuels is an unacceptable status quo for a state that prides itself on climate action. Tell CARB and Governor Newsom it’s time to prioritize climate action and clean air by reforming the LCFS program. 

An all electric bus driving on the streets of Los Angeles in front of Los Angeles City Hall.
An all electric bus is seen in Los Angeles, Jan. 12, 2021. (Ringo Chiu via AP)

Final Day

Delivery to California Air Resources Board and Governor Gavin Newsom

Important Notice

Your message is delivered to a public agency, and all information submitted may be placed in the public record. Do not submit confidential information.

By taking action, you will receive emails from Earthjustice. Change your mailing preferences or opt-out at any time. Learn more in our Privacy Policy. This Earthjustice action is hosted on EveryAction. Learn about EveryAction’s Privacy Policy.

Why is a phone number or prefix required on some action forms?

Trouble Viewing This Action?

If the action form is not loading above, please add earthjustice.org as a trusted website in your ad blocker or pause any ad blockers, and refresh this webpage. (Details.) If the action form still does not display, please report the problem to us at action@earthjustice.org. Thank you!

Your Actions Matter

Your messages make a difference, even if we have leaders who don't want to listen. Here's why.

You level the playing field.

Elected officials pay attention when they see that we are paying attention. Read more.

They may be hearing from industry lobbyists left and right, but hearing the stories of their constituents — that’s your power.

Our legislators serve at the pleasure of the people who gave them their job — you.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. When you contact your elected official, you’re putting a face and a name on an issue.

Whether or not you voted for them, they work for you, for the duration of their term.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. (Find your local, state, and federal elected officials.)

Your action is with us in court.

If a federal agency finalizes a harmful action, the record of public comments provides a basis for bringing them into court. Read more.

Throughout each of the public comment periods we alert you to, Earthjustice’s attorneys are researching and writing in-depth, technical comments to submit — detailing how the regulation could and should be stronger to protect the environment, our communities, and our planet.

We need you to join us — your specific experiences, knowledge, and voice are crucial to add to the Administrative Record through the comment periods.

Lawsuits we file that challenge weak or harmful federal regulations rely on what was submitted during the comment period. The court can only look at documents that are in the Administrative Record — including the public comments — to decide if the agency did something improper.

Your actions aid our litigation. Taking action and submitting comments during a comment period is substantively important.

It’s the law.

Federal agencies must pause what they’re doing and ask for — and consider — your comment. Read more.

Many of us may have never heard of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but laws like these require our government to ask the public to weigh in before agencies adopt or change regulations.

Regulations essentially describe how federal agencies will carry out laws — including decisions that could undermine science, or weaken safeguards on public health.

Public comments are collected at various points throughout the federal government’s rulemaking process, including when a regulation is proposed and finalized. (Learn about the rulemaking process.) These comments become part of the official, legal public record — the “Administrative Record.”

When the public responds with a huge outpouring of support for environmental protections, these individual messages collectively undercut politicians' attempts to claim otherwise.

What this means is each of us can take a role in shaping the rules our government creates — and ensuring those rules are fair and effective.