Tell the EPA to address coke oven emissions

26,000

Supporters spoke up in this action

Delivery to Environmental Protection Agency

Action ended on October 2, 2023

What Happens Next

Thank you to all who took action! We’re grateful for your support.

What Was At Stake

For far too long, companies have put profits over protecting public health. On such example is the steel industry, which uses coke ovens that emit cancer-causing air pollution that is well above safe levels. A coke oven is a chamber that heats up coal to make coke, a refined fuel that is used to melt metals, particularly in steelmaking. These chambers release hazardous air pollutants like lead, mercury, benzene, and more. These emissions are toxic to humans and threaten public health. Yet, it has been almost two decades since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed emission standards that incorporate the most recent science and risk assessment to set limits for these hazardous emissions. You can help change this.

The EPA has taken an important step to address this issue by proposing new air toxics standards for coke oven emissions. You can play a pivotal role in ensuring the EPA’s new standards are protective of public health by sending your comment to urge the agency to adopt a final rule that includes robust fenceline monitoring provisions and strong standards that reflect the best available science and risk analysis.

Coke oven emissions are so toxic that the EPA classifies them as a known carcinogen. These emissions increase the risk of people developing cancers of the lung, kidney, prostate, and other organs. Chronic exposure to coke oven emissions can also result in pink eye, severe eczema, and lesions in the respiratory and digestive systems.

As this proposed rule moves forward, the EPA must listen to and address concerns from communities suffering from coke oven pollution. It’s critical that the EPA include in its final rule a robust fenceline monitoring program that helps companies, the EPA, and communities track fugitive coke oven emissions, and adopt strong standards that reflect the best available science and risk analysis, including consideration of cumulative impacts of multiple polluters on communities near coke ovens.

Tell the EPA to finalize the strongest possible and most protective air standards for coke oven emissions so that the agency can deepen its commitment to protecting communities.

The EES Coke Battery facility on Zug Island in River Rouge, Michigan. The plant is owned by DTE Vantage, a subsidiary of DTE Energy. The EES Coke facility releases thousands of tons of sulfur dioxide in the overburdened River Rouge community and near the state’s most polluted zip code, 48217.
The EES Coke Battery facility on Zug Island in River Rouge, Michigan. The plant is owned by DTE Vantage, a subsidiary of DTE Energy. The EES Coke facility releases thousands of tons of sulfur dioxide in the overburdened River Rouge community and near the state’s most polluted zip code, 48217. (Ted Auch / FracTracker Alliance)

Your Actions Matter

Your messages make a difference, even if we have leaders who don't want to listen. Here's why.

You level the playing field.

Elected officials pay attention when they see that we are paying attention. Read more.

They may be hearing from industry lobbyists left and right, but hearing the stories of their constituents — that’s your power.

Our legislators serve at the pleasure of the people who gave them their job — you.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. When you contact your elected official, you’re putting a face and a name on an issue.

Whether or not you voted for them, they work for you, for the duration of their term.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. (Find your local, state, and federal elected officials.)

Your action is with us in court.

If a federal agency finalizes a harmful action, the record of public comments provides a basis for bringing them into court. Read more.

Throughout each of the public comment periods we alert you to, Earthjustice’s attorneys are researching and writing in-depth, technical comments to submit — detailing how the regulation could and should be stronger to protect the environment, our communities, and our planet.

We need you to join us — your specific experiences, knowledge, and voice are crucial to add to the Administrative Record through the comment periods.

Lawsuits we file that challenge weak or harmful federal regulations rely on what was submitted during the comment period. The court can only look at documents that are in the Administrative Record — including the public comments — to decide if the agency did something improper.

Your actions aid our litigation. Taking action and submitting comments during a comment period is substantively important.

It’s the law.

Federal agencies must pause what they’re doing and ask for — and consider — your comment. Read more.

Many of us may have never heard of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but laws like these require our government to ask the public to weigh in before agencies adopt or change regulations.

Regulations essentially describe how federal agencies will carry out laws — including decisions that could undermine science, or weaken safeguards on public health.

Public comments are collected at various points throughout the federal government’s rulemaking process, including when a regulation is proposed and finalized. (Learn about the rulemaking process.) These comments become part of the official, legal public record — the “Administrative Record.”

When the public responds with a huge outpouring of support for environmental protections, these individual messages collectively undercut politicians' attempts to claim otherwise.

What this means is each of us can take a role in shaping the rules our government creates — and ensuring those rules are fair and effective.