This fossil fuel company has put communities in Puerto Rico in harm’s way for too long

What's At Stake

In 2018, New Fortress Energy, through its Puerto Rico-based subsidiary NFEnergía, began designing a large liquified natural gas (LNG) terminal in San Juan Harbor to import methane gas that would run through a pipeline to the nearby power plant.

This is a violation of federal law because it did not receive approval from the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC).

FERC is legally responsible for assessing the health, public safety, and environmental risks of gas and oil projects before they begin operating, and the agency must inform the public so they can engage in any approval process.

But that didn’t happen.

Instead, NFEnergía chose to break the law and began building the terminal without receiving approval from FERC.

No one in the surrounding communities was notified or consulted about this project — even though the potentially explosive terminal sits less than a quarter mile from the closest homes. According to the National Environmental Policy Act and the Natural Gas Act, as concerned residents, we have a right to have their voices heard when a major project is proposed to be built in our communities.

Groups in Puerto Rico deserve to be heard. Join us in telling FERC to schedule Spanish-speaking, in-person public meetings in Puerto Rico’s dangerous methane gas project area and its surrounding neighborhoods, with simultaneous translation for its personnel if needed.

The people living close to the LNG terminal are within the blast radius of possible catastrophic gas explosions. They are also vulnerable to long-term health impacts from chronic exposure to increased toxic air pollution from methane combustion leaks and added exhaust from the terminal’s associated truck and ship traffic.

To make matters worse, the gas industry is seeking to expand operations at the San Juan harbor so larger tankers can bring more gas across the archipelago. FERC must take into consideration that any expansion of gas infrastructure and imports into Puerto Rico would not improve an already failed electric system.

There is abundant evidence that rooftop solar and storage systems — coupled with energy conservation, efficiency and literacy programs, as well as other alternatives — for every household in Puerto Rico is the safest and healthiest solution to withstand the effects of climate change on the archipelago. Simply put, Puerto Ricans deserve a reliable electricity supply and a clean environment.

New Fortress Energy and NFEnergía must be held accountable for the public safety, environmental, and climate threats its gas terminal presents.

LNG transport ship at the New Fortress Energy facility in San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico
LNG transport ship at the New Fortress Energy facility in San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico (Courtesy of Myrna Conty)

Delivery to the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission

Important Notice

Your message is delivered to a public agency, and all information submitted may be placed in the public record. Do not submit confidential information.

By taking action, you will receive emails from Earthjustice. Change your mailing preferences or opt-out at any time. Learn more in our Privacy Policy. This Earthjustice action is hosted on EveryAction. Learn about EveryAction’s Privacy Policy.

Why is a phone number or prefix required on some action forms?

Trouble Viewing This Action?

If the action form is not loading above, please add earthjustice.org as a trusted website in your ad blocker or pause any ad blockers, and refresh this webpage. (Details.) If the action form still does not display, please report the problem to us at action@earthjustice.org. Thank you!

Your Actions Matter

Your messages make a difference, even if we have leaders who don't want to listen. Here's why.

You level the playing field.

Elected officials pay attention when they see that we are paying attention. Read more.

They may be hearing from industry lobbyists left and right, but hearing the stories of their constituents — that’s your power.

Our legislators serve at the pleasure of the people who gave them their job — you.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. When you contact your elected official, you’re putting a face and a name on an issue.

Whether or not you voted for them, they work for you, for the duration of their term.

Make sure your elected officials know whose community and whose values they represent. (Find your local, state, and federal elected officials.)

Your action is with us in court.

If a federal agency finalizes a harmful action, the record of public comments provides a basis for bringing them into court. Read more.

Throughout each of the public comment periods we alert you to, Earthjustice’s attorneys are researching and writing in-depth, technical comments to submit — detailing how the regulation could and should be stronger to protect the environment, our communities, and our planet.

We need you to join us — your specific experiences, knowledge, and voice are crucial to add to the Administrative Record through the comment periods.

Lawsuits we file that challenge weak or harmful federal regulations rely on what was submitted during the comment period. The court can only look at documents that are in the Administrative Record — including the public comments — to decide if the agency did something improper.

Your actions aid our litigation. Taking action and submitting comments during a comment period is substantively important.

It’s the law.

Federal agencies must pause what they’re doing and ask for — and consider — your comment. Read more.

Many of us may have never heard of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but laws like these require our government to ask the public to weigh in before agencies adopt or change regulations.

Regulations essentially describe how federal agencies will carry out laws — including decisions that could undermine science, or weaken safeguards on public health.

Public comments are collected at various points throughout the federal government’s rulemaking process, including when a regulation is proposed and finalized. (Learn about the rulemaking process.) These comments become part of the official, legal public record — the “Administrative Record.”

When the public responds with a huge outpouring of support for environmental protections, these individual messages collectively undercut politicians' attempts to claim otherwise.

What this means is each of us can take a role in shaping the rules our government creates — and ensuring those rules are fair and effective.