Earthjustice is fighting on multiple fronts to protect America’s Arctic, one of our last truly wild landscapes.
The tundra, icy seas, and craggy mountains on the north coast of Alaska are unlike anywhere else on Earth. These are places with no roads, no infrastructure, and no noise from machinery or civilization. They are federal lands and waters, held in trust by all Americans.
The Arctic lands and waters targeted for oil and gas drilling remain wild today because people took a stand to protect them. Yet under the Trump administration, special interests have gotten a free pass to push their dirty energy agenda.
The Trump administration has targeted substantial protections, gained through decades of advocacy, to pave the way for industrial exploitation in the region’s most sensitive lands and waters.
Earthjustice and our allies are challenging expanded oil and gas drilling across America’s Arctic.
- The vast majority of the Arctic Ocean saw protections from drilling restored in 2019, following a court decision that found the Trump administration violated federal law. The lawsuit was brought by Earthjustice on behalf of our clients.
- In the Western Arctic, the Trump administration rolled back hard-won safeguards and auctioned off millions of acres to industry. We’re challenging the administration’s deeply flawed plans in court.
- In the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Earthjustice has also brought the administration into court, challenging its unlawful decision to allow oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain.
Earthjustice is working with partners and allies and using the power of the law to defend each of these areas:
- We’re challenging the Trump administration's significantly flawed plan that would allow oil and gas drilling on 18.7 million acres in the Western Arctic.
- We are working with a broad coalition of allies to defend the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from the irreversible harm that would come from oil and gas drilling, filing a legal challenge on Aug. 24, 2020.
- We took President Trump to court for unlawfully seeking to undo the permanent Arctic Ocean drilling ban created under the Obama administration. And we won.1 A federal judge struck down Trump’s order, restoring permanent protections from drilling to 98% of the Arctic Ocean. The judge ruled Trump exceeded his constitutional authority and violated federal law — demonstrating that our country remains a nation of laws, in which the judiciary stands ready to ensure that no one can act above the law.
The stakes in our battle to preserve these wild places couldn’t be higher. Climate scientists2 have found that drilling the Arctic is “incommensurate with efforts to limit average global warming to 2°C.”
And by the U.S. government’s own telling, the chances of a major oil spill are dangerously high3 and the ability to clean it up extremely low4 if offshore development goes ahead.
There’s no place on Earth like the Arctic. Iconic species like polar bears and walruses can’t find another home farther south—and there’s no farther north to go.
The Gwich’in people call the coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge, where caribou migrate hundreds of miles to bear their young Izhik gwats’an gwandaii goodlit—“The sacred place where life begins.”5
Far more than full-time northern residents rely on the Arctic for survival. Migratory birds from all 50 states and six continents nest in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and parts of the Western Arctic.
If we destroy the lands where they raise their young, the whole world will feel the loss. Learn why these regions under threat are so precious and what tools we have to fight back.
Earthjustice has gone to court several times in the last decades6 to defend the Western Arctic, an Indiana-size tract of federally owned land.
Administratively known as the “National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska,” much of the Western Arctic is wild and undisturbed, in contrast with the industrialized oil fields of Prudhoe Bay to the east.
Our litigation has helped win protections for Teshekpuk Lake,7 one of the most ecologically important wetlands in the Arctic. The Teshekpuk Lake lands and many other sensitive areas in the Western Arctic were placed off limits to drilling in 2013.8
Yet Trump’s Department of Interior has opened the door to significant expansion of industrial activity in and around the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area, and is steadily moving forward with a rewrite9 of the Obama-era management plan.
In addition to providing some of the most important migratory bird habitat in the world, the wild area is home to the Teshekpuk Caribou Herd. For generations Iñupiat people have tracked and hunted these caribou, and Indigenous subsistence hunting is vital to the culture and economy of the nearby Native Village of Nuiqsut.
Earthjustice is representing the Native Village of Nuiqsut tribal government and five conservation groups in a challenge to BLM’s approval of ConocoPhillips’ winter exploratory drilling program.
Lease sales have exposed more of the Western Arctic to drilling than ever before. More than 10 million acres of the Western Arctic were offered for oil and gas leasing in December 2017,10 an area nearly equivalent to the size of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, combined. The 2018 lease sale included another 2.85 million acres.
One oil company, ConocoPhillips, holds most of the leases in the Western Arctic, and it has plans to explore and develop ever further westward and closer to the irreplaceable Teshekpuk Lake area.
With the many looming threats to the Arctic, it’s here in the Western Arctic that the oil industry is already making investments and proposing to drill in sensitive areas now.
But there’s reason for hope: We’ve persuaded courts to keep this land wild before, and now we are back in court fighting to preserve the Western Arctic.
On behalf of Natural Resources Defense Council, Greenpeace, Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Earth, Earthjustice filed suit on Feb. 2, 2018,11 in the U.S. District Court in Anchorage challenging federal lease sales12 that pave the way for expanded oil and gas drilling in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
Among other flaws, the Bureau of Land Management completely ignored the effects of greenhouse gas emissions that will accumulate if Reserve fossil fuels are extracted and burned, even though the National Environmental Policy Act13 requires the agency to analyze these foreseeable climate impacts and their serious implications for future generations.
We appealed the district court's procedural dismissal of our challenge. The decision was made on procedural grounds in December 2018, without reaching the merits of our arguments.
On Aug. 25, 2020, we filed one of several recent legal challenges contesting the Trump administration’s aggressive push to vastly increase oil and gas leasing, exploration and development across America’s Arctic.
The lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s rushed and significantly flawed plan to allow oil and gas drilling on 18.7 million acres in the western Arctic. It was filed on behalf of National Audubon Society, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth, and Stand.Earth.
Finally, on Aug. 18, 2021, the district court in Alaska vacated the Trump administration’s decision approving ConocoPhillips’ Willow Master Development Plan, halting the largest oil-and-gas drilling project in the Alaskan Arctic.
“We were very surprised to see the Biden administration, which has promised historic progress on climate change, defending this plan in court — but today’s decision gives the administration the opportunity to reconsider the project in light of its commitment to address the climate emergency,” said Earthjustice attorney Jeremy Lieb. “We must keep Arctic oil in the ground if we want a livable planet for future generations.”
In December 2017, Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a bill that used backdoor budgetary tactics to open the Refuge’s coastal plain to oil and gas drilling.14 The measure requires the Interior Department to hold an oil and gas lease sale in the coastal plain within four years, and the administration is already moving forward.
In February of 2019, lawmakers introduced the bipartisan Arctic Cultural and Coastal Plain Protection Act in the 116th Congress. This bill would restore critical protections prohibiting oil and gas development on the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, effectively undoing the measure from the 2017 tax bill.
“We rely on the Porcupine Caribou, and the Porcupine Caribou rely on the Coastal Plain as their calving and nursery grounds,” said Bernadette Demientieff, executive director of the Gwich’in Steering Committee, addressing a House Natural Resources subcommittee in a March 2019 hearing on the legislation. “Oil and gas activities on the Coastal Plain is a direct attack on our ways of life and to our human rights.”
At a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing in November of 2017, Gwich’in tribal member Sam Alexander described15 how drilling in the Refuge would destroy his people’s way of life.
“Money can’t buy our wealth. But the reckless pursuit of money can take it away. And for that we will never stop fighting to protect the Porcupine caribou herd and our way of life.”16
“The Gwich’in are the caribou people,” Alexander continued. “The Gwich’in have lived in this area and relied on the Porcupine Caribou Herd since time immemorial. Caribou are how we survive and are integral to who we are and how we define ourselves.”
“Caribou are our stories, our soul, the food on our table, our clothes, and our tools.”17
And it won’t just be the wilderness and wildlife of the Refuge that will suffer if drilling proceeds there.
The emissions from oil and gas development would exacerbate global warming and raise global sea levels, increasing the climate threat to low-lying coastal cities around the world.
In addition, melting permafrost could release large amounts of methane, which is roughly 30 times more potent at trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.18 Toxic pollutants emitted from oil and gas development are already having an adverse health impact on frontline communities.19
Political leaders have repeatedly determined that drilling in the Refuge is a terrible idea.
President Dwight Eisenhower set aside the territory as a federally protected area in 1960, for the purpose of preserving unique wildlife, wilderness and recreational values.20 President Bill Clinton vetoed a 1995 budget bill21 that would have opened the Arctic Refuge for oil and gas leasing.
And in 2005, about two dozen House Republicans convinced their leadership to strip a similar provision from a budget bill by threatening to vote ‘no’ if the budget included refuge drilling.22
Earthjustice is working with a broad coalition of partners to oppose this latest reckless attempt to hand over the publicly owned wilderness of the Arctic Refuge to the oil and gas industry.
Trump signed a law opening the Refuge to oil leasing, but before anything can happen on the ground, the Trump administration will have to comply with many federal laws designed to protect the values of the Refuge. We will take action to enforce those laws.
On Aug. 24, 2020, the National Audubon Society, Center for Biological Diversity, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Friends of the Earth, represented by Earthjustice and NRDC, filed a federal lawsuit to block drilling in the Refuge.
The lawsuit calls for the court to block the leasing program because its approval ignored federal law, violating the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, National Wildlife Refuge Administration Act, and Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. The lawsuit is one of several legal actions launched in response to the oil and gas drilling plan. The Gwich’in Steering Committee, a voice for indigenous traditional hunting communities, also filed suit to challenge the oil and gas development plan.
We will be there every step of the way in the fight to keep oil drilling out of the Refuge.
Beginning in the George W. Bush administration, Earthjustice represented a coalition of Alaska Native and conservation groups in legal action to oppose new leasing and then exploration drilling.23
In several critical cases, we won injunctions that stopped drilling and forced reconsideration of the federal government’s plan to turn the Arctic Ocean into an oil field.
We’ve had a preview of how disastrous Arctic Ocean drilling could be.
Though our work helped stop most of the industry’s efforts to drill, in 2012, oil giant Royal Dutch Shell did receive federal approval to do some limited exploratory drilling in the Arctic’s seas.24 The company immediately ran into safety problems.25
One of its oil rigs, the Kulluk, ran aground in southern Alaska during a storm, wrecking so badly it had to be scrapped.26 Following this misadventure, and another failed attempt to drill in the Chukchi Sea in 2015,27 Shell abandoned its Arctic Ocean exploration and, along with almost every other company, eventually relinquished its leases.28
Building on our successful legal efforts, we undertook a campaign with our partners at the close of the Obama administration to put in place permanent protections for the Arctic Ocean.
The administration responded with two important steps to preserve the Arctic Ocean in 2016. Under a law called the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act,29 Obama permanently withdrew almost 120 million acres in the Arctic Ocean from drilling, leaving just 2% of the region open for development.30
In its five-year leasing plan, Obama's Department of the Interior also took that remaining 2% off the table for new leasing until at least 2022, citing, among other things, the severe difficulty of containing and cleaning up a large oil spill in the Arctic, which it acknowledged would be “reasonably foreseeable and assumed” if development were allowed.31
According to the government’s analysis, there is a 75% chance of an oil spill if even one oil lease is fully developed.32
The Trump administration now wants to undo these protections. In April 2017, Trump issued an executive order purporting to undo Obama’s permanent protection of the Arctic and parts of the Atlantic Oceans from offshore drilling.33
We’re representing a coalition of conservation and Alaska Native groups in a legal challenge to Trump’s executive order, which exceeded his authority under the statute and Constitution. On Mar. 19, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the District Alaska rejected arguments by the Trump administration and the American Petroleum Institute to dismiss the lawsuit.34
“President Trump tried to shut the courthouse door,” said Earthjustice Attorney Erik Grafe. “But the court’s order keeps the door open and affirms that we are a country of laws; the President gets no exception. We now look forward to demonstrating to the court that President Trump violated the law and the constitution in attempting to undo the Arctic and Atlantic drilling ban.”
On Mar. 29, 2019, the court ruled against the Trump administration, restoring permanent protections from drilling to 98% of the Arctic Ocean, in addition to uniquely important deepwater canyons in the Atlantic Ocean.
The opinion demonstrates that this country remains a nation of laws, in which the judiciary stands ready to ensure that no one can act above the law.
In light of the reinstatement of these protections, this year's court ruling will force the Trump administration to reconsider its aggressive national five-year leasing program for the outer continental shelf.
In 2018, then-Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke rolled out a proposal for a new plan that would revoke existing protections, opening the door to drilling in about 90% of federal waters, including the entire Arctic Ocean, and scheduling the largest number of leases ever.35
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is also trying to weaken offshore drilling safety rules36 enacted in response to the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster.
Coast Guard Admiral Paul Zukunft, who led the federal response after the Deepwater Horizon spill, told a Washington symposium in July of 2017 that there is no hope of cleaning up a similar spill in the Arctic.
“I can assure you that if there is an oil spill, we’re not going to recover all that oil,” Zukunft said.37
“And in fact, in the best of days, during Deepwater Horizon, we maybe recovered 15% of that oil … We had a fleet of over 6,000 ships out there doing recovery operations—and we had the infrastructure to support all of that.
“Now, you put that many people up in Barrow, Alaska? They better be carrying polar bear spray, because they’re going to be camped out with the mosquitos—because we don’t have the infrastructure up there.”
The public has already spoken out against what the Trump administration is proposing, and opposition is steadily growing as the new offshore leasing proposal moves forward.38 During the development of the Obama-era plan President Trump is now trying to replace, 1.4 million people submitted comments that called for no new offshore drilling.
As of March of 2018, more than 1.35 million Americans had already registered their opposition to an early draft of the five-year plan, adding to the wave of opposition from local, state and national leaders.39
The Arctic has warmed more than twice as rapidly as the rest of the United States over the past 60 years, leading to impacts such as thawing permafrost and vanishing sea ice—and the trend is only expected to continue.
To reverse course and avoid the worst impacts of climate change, the world must aggressively reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but the Trump administration is moving us in the opposite direction. Rather than permanently alter unique wilderness landscapes and jeopardize biologically rich Arctic Ocean waters with the risk of a catastrophic oil spill, the wisest course for America’s Arctic and the rest of the globe is to keep it in the ground.
Learn more about indigenous-led movements and environmentalists’ ongoing efforts to protect the Arctic through The Last Oil, a symposium hosted by the University of New Mexico in February 2018.
LCV v. Trump, U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, Case No. 3:17-cv-00101-SLG, 2019.
McGlade C, Ekins P. “The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C.” Nature, 2015 Jan 8;517(7533):187-90. doi: 10.1038/nature14016.
Mr. Samuel Alexander, Tribal Member, Gwichyaa Zhee Gwich’in Tribal Government, speaking before the Full Committee Hearing to Receive Testimony on the Potential for Oil and Gas Exploration in the 1002 Area at the 366 Dirksen Senate Office Building on Nov. 2, 2017. Audio excerpt begins at 1:08:38.
Mr. Samuel Alexander, Tribal Member, Gwichyaa Zhee Gwich’in Tribal Government, speaking before the Full Committee Hearing to Receive Testimony on the Potential for Oil and Gas Exploration in the 1002 Area at the 366 Dirksen Senate Office Building on Nov. 2, 2017.
Establishing the Arctic National Wildlife Range. Public Land Order 2214, FR Doc. 60-11510, Dec. 6, 1960
"As Long Promised, President Vetoes The G.O.P. Budget." The New York Times, Dec. 7, 1995.
"GOP Scraps ANWR Drilling, But Budget Battle Persists." NPR, Nov. 10, 2005.
"Government Gives Go Ahead to Shell to Top Drill in Arctic." Earthjustice, Aug. 30, 2012.