Martinez, CA —

On June 4th 2009, Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Barbara Zuniga tossed out the Environmental Impact Report for a major expansion at the Chevron Refinery, in Richmond, California. Community groups hailed the decision as a significant victory over U.S. oil refinery expansions happening across the country to accommodate heavier, dirtier crude oil.

Link to decision below.

At issue was an environmental review that failed to disclose that the proposed expansion would allow Chevron to process heavier crude oil. Environmental, community, and public health groups sued the City of Richmond for accepting a flawed EIR that did not fully analyze the project’s health and environmental impacts. Heavier crude oil can contain higher amounts of contaminants, such as mercury and selenium, which can cause serious health problems.

“The City of Richmond signed off on an oil refinery expansion plan that likely would have opened the gates for Chevron to refine heavier, dirtier crude oil, which could increase pollution.” said Earthjustice attorney Will Rostov. “This needs to be studied in an environmental impact report.”

In her decision, Judge Zuniga said: “The [Final Environmental Impact Report] project description is unclear and inconsistent as to whether [the] project will or will not enable Chevron to process a heavier crude slate than it is currently processing.”

“Protecting our communities from additional toxic and global warming pollution is a huge victory,” said Jessica Tovar, a community organizer with Communities for a Better Environment. “This is an opportunity to invest in clean green energy as a solution, instead of compromising our health by locking in a generation of refining dirtier crude oil.”

“The decision is a victory for the community,” said Koy Seng Saechao, a community leader with the Asian Pacific Environmental Network. “We need green and healthy solutions from Chevron and our City, not more pollution. The decision protects my family and neighbors from even more pollution and allows us to plan for a healthier future.”

“The decision is a great victory for environmental justice for Richmond residents and the country,” said Dr. Henry Clark of the West County Toxics Coalition. “It shows that justice is alive and well. We should all be proud of this decision that protects our communities health and safety.”

Court Requires Review of Greenhouse Gas Mitigations under California Law

The court also held that the City improperly allowed Chevron to wait a year after the EIR process was completed before developing a plan to mitigate its greenhouse gases. This is one of the first decisions addressing the deferral of greenhouse gas mitigations under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Finally, the court agreed with Plaintiffs that the project had omitted an important component: a hydrogen pipeline that would attach to the newly approved hydrogen plant — one of the project’s four key components — and stretch to ConocoPhillips Rodeo Refinery and Shell’s Martinez refinery.

BACKGROUND

Communities in Richmond, particularly low-income and communities of color already suffer from industrial pollution-related health problems, including high rates of asthma and cancer. Chevron’s refinery is the largest industrial polluter in the region.

The case Communities for a Better Environment, Asian Pacific Environmental Network & West County Toxics Coalition v. City of Richmond was filed in Contra Costa County Superior Court on September 4th, 2008 by attorneys from Earthjustice and CBE.

Read the decision here: http://www.earthjustice.org/library/legal_docs/chevron-decision-6409.pdf