A strong majority of Colorado residents support the Endangered Species Act and believe decisions about which imperiled species should or should not be protected under the law should be made by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologists, not by members of Congress, according to a new poll conducted by Tulchin Research. These poll results arrive even as the current Congress has been flooded with more than 80 bills, amendments, and riders, including numerous provisions in the funding bills for the Department of the Interior and other agencies, designed to weaken the act or remove protections for specific listed species
The poll, conducted in September for Defenders of Wildlife and Earthjustice, shows that:
- Eight in ten (80%) registered voters in Colorado support upholding the Endangered Species Act, including 49% who strongly support it.
- Eighty-seven percent (87%) of registered voters in Colorado believe that decisions about which species should or should not be protected under the Endangered Species Act should be made by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologists, not by members of Congress.
- Three-quarters (72%) of registered voters in Colorado voters are more likely to vote for a member of Congress who supports environmental safeguards like the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.
- Seventy-eight percent (78%) of registered voters in Colorado reject the notion that the Endangered Species Act “hurts the economy and destroys jobs,” believing instead that “the law is necessary” and that “we can protect our natural heritage for future generations while growing our economy and creating jobs.”
Jamie Rappaport Clark, President and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, issued the following statement:
“These poll results paint a compelling picture for Colorado’s elected officials. Not only do their constituents want their representatives and senators to uphold the Endangered Species Act, and are more likely to vote for them if they do, Coloradans believe Congress should leave science to the scientists and therefore should not make decisions on whether or not a species should be protected.”
“As Colorado’s Congressional delegation participates this fall in debates on must-pass legislation to fund the Department of the Interior and other federal agencies, it's critical they remember where their constituents stand on this issue and reject any bills or riders that weaken the ESA and further jeopardize imperiled wildlife.”
Drew Caputo, Earthjustice VP of Litigation for Lands, Wildlife and Oceans, issued the following statement:
“We commissioned the poll in light of the current wave of congressional attacks on the Endangered Species Act, including efforts by some in Congress to make decisions about specific imperiled species based on politics rather than science. We wanted to gauge Americans’ resolve to protect our nation’s wildlife. What we found is that across gender, age, ethnic, geographic and political lines, American voters whole-heartedly support the Endangered Species Act and don’t believe politicians should meddle with a law that has proven 99% successful in bringing species back from the brink of extinction.”
Form Sept. 8- 13, 2015, Tulchin Research conducted a telephone survey of 200 likely November 2016 voters in Colorado, using live professional callers and dialing both landlines and cell phones. The margin of error for this survey is +/- 6.9 percentage points
This Congress has already established itself as one of the most environmentally hostile congresses in history. Since January, Members of Congress have introduced over 80 proposals that would cripple endangered species conservation. Some legislative proposals put specific imperiled wildlife species on the chopping block, while others attack core provisions of the Endangered Species Act itself.
“Vote To Protect Wildlife and Wild Lands,” Defenders’ information on Endangered Species Act riders
“Political Animals,” Earthjustice special feature on methods congress is using to weaken the Act