EPA Asked to Investigate Pesticide Poisonings

Honolulu —

Today national and Hawaiʻi-based groups formally called upon the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance to investigate the recent pesticide poisoning that sent employees of Syngenta Seeds to the hospital.  

Syngenta and other companies use chlorpyrifos heavily on the genetically engineered seed crops they grow on thousands of acres on Kauaʻi.

On January 20, 2016, workers walked into a Syngenta field in Kekaha, on Kauaʻi’s west side, after it had been sprayed with chlorpyrifos, and were taken to the hospital for treatment.  Syngenta has refused to provide information about the incident, such as how many workers were affected or the treatment they received, whether Syngenta had directed them to enter the field, and whether warning signs had been posted.  

Earthjustice, Farmworker Justice, Pesticide Action Network, Hawaiʻi Alliance for Progressive Action, Hawai‘i SEED, Farmworker Association of Florida, and The MOM Hui are asking EPA to step in and ensure that a thorough investigation is performed and the results made public.

Earthjustice attorney Paul Achitoff commented, “Time and again, Hawaiʻi authorities have turned their back on Hawaiʻi’s residents and farmworkers in favor of agrochemical companies.  We have no confidence that an investigation by the Hawaiʻi Department of Agriculture will get to the bottom of this incident, or take measures to ensure these poisonings stop.  We expect the EPA to get involved immediately and ensure the facts are found and made public, and appropriate enforcement action is taken.”

Chlorpyrifos is a potent neurotoxin.  Extensive scientific evidence ties the pesticide to nervous system damage and persistent developmental disorders, as well as autoimmune conditions, lung cancer, colorectal cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.  Exposure during pregnancy can stunt a child’s mental development and permanently lower IQ.  

Milestones In The Fight To Ban Chlorpyrifos

1965

Chlorpyrifos is first registered as an insecticide in the U.S. for both agricultural and residential uses.

1995

DowElanco pays an $876,000 fine for violating federal law requiring it to report human health problems from chlorpyrifos.

2000

Dow withdraws chlorpyrifos from most indoor and pet uses, after reaching an agreement with EPA.

2007

Earthjustice sues EPA for failing to protect farmworkers and their children from chlorpyrifos use in the fields.

2009

Earthjustice files petition on behalf of farmworker and health advocates asking EPA to protect kids from pesticide drift.

2010

Earthjustice files the first of three lawsuits to compel EPA to act on banning chlorpyrifos.

A Columbia University study links chlorpyrifos exposure to mental and motor skill impairments in children.

2012

EPA finally protects children from chlorpyrifos drift by requiring buffers around places they inhabit like schools and day cares.

2014

EPA acknowledges the extensive body of peer-reviewed science correlating chlorpyrifos exposure with brain damage to children.

August 2015

9th Circuit Court of Appeals orders EPA to act on the petition filed in 2007 to ban chlorpyrifos.

October 2015

EPA proposes to ban chlorpyrifos on all food crops. The agency will have two rounds of public comment and anticipates a final rule at the end of 2016.

January 2016

More than 80,000 people urge EPA to ban the use of chlorpyrifoson all crops in the comment period ending January 5.

Syngenta and other companies use the chemical heavily on the genetically engineered seed crops they grow on thousands of acres on Kauaʻi, as well as on Oʻahu, Maui, and Molokaʻi, mostly near low-income communities.  EPA banned most home use of almost all chlorpyrifos products in 2001, and recently proposed to revoke all food residue tolerances for the pesticide.  After the January 20, 2016 incident, Syngenta said it has no plans to discontinue using the chemical.  

“This unfortunate incident underscores the urgent need for stronger protections for farmworkers, who are at greatest risk of harm from daily direct exposure to pesticides,” said Virginia Ruiz, Director of Occupational and Environmental Health at Farmworker Justice.  “The EPA must conduct a thorough investigation to determine why these workers did not receive adequate notification or protective equipment to prevent their exposure to a neurotoxic pesticide, and whether the subsequent medical treatment was sufficient to address the harm to their health.”

This is not the first time chlorpyrifos has caused harm in Hawaiʻi.  After dozens of teachers and children at Waimea Canyon Middle School, also near Syngenta’s Kauaʻi fields, were taken to the hospital with symptoms consistent with pesticide poisoning on several occasions between November 2006 and April 2008, the Hawaiʻi Department of Agriculture funded an investigation more than a year later.  It found chlorpyrifos and other pesticides in air samples at the school, but attributed all of the symptoms to the presence of “stinkweed,” a common plant.  

The Hawaiʻi Department of Health found chlorpyrifos in the canals that drain the companies’ West Kauaʻi fields and empty into the nearshore waters where residents fish and surf, after passing directly through Kekaha.  

Nor would this be the first time Syngenta has violated EPA’s Worker Protection Standard, designed to prevent this type of harm.  In 2008, Syngenta was fined for failing to post the spraying of the pesticide Liberty (sulfentrazone and imazethapyr), among other violations.  Syngenta and other agrochemical companies have opposed efforts to protect residents from pesticide drift in Hawaiʻi, including by suing Kauaʻi County to overturn an ordinance the Kauaʻi County Council passed in 2013 to require disclosure and buffer zones around schools, hospitals, and waterways, and by lobbying against bills introduced in the Hawaiʻi State Legislature seeking similar measures. 

Achitoff added, “EPA’s website tells us its Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ‘goes after pollution problems that impact American communities through vigorous civil and criminal enforcement that targets the most serious water, air and chemical hazards. As part of this mission, we work to advance environmental justice by protecting communities most vulnerable to pollution.’  That’s exactly what we need now.”

Read the letter.