Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Science on Trial?

FOLLOW OUR BLOG:

RSS

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Jessica Knoblauch:
Friday Finds: Monsanto’s Ministry of Truth

Pesticide-resistant bugs eat Monsanto’s crops, lies & profits Monsanto is taking a page from George Orwell's 1984 with the recent release of a...

by Jessica Knoblauch:
Friday Finds: Big Coal’s Big Sugar Daddies

Report finds allegedly “green” banks finance dirty coal A recent investigation by a group of non-governmental organizations found that a ...

by Liz Judge:
Appalachian Coal Jobs Reach 14-Year High

A little-covered news item from Nov. 18 bears much more attention. The Charleston Gazette's Ken Ward reported on some new data that blows the top off ...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Tom Turner's blog posts
26 August 2009, 8:35 AM
U.S. Chamber of Commerce demands new Scopes trial

Things involving climate change are getting decidedly bizarre. The three-million-member U.S. Chamber of Commerce is demanding that the Environmental Protection Agency hold a trial—witnesses, cross-examination, the whole nine yards—to challenge climate science. The Chamber's purpose is to head off regulations that EPA may adopt based on an upcoming "finding" that CO2 emissions "endanger" human (Americans' in this case) health.

William Kovacs, a vice president of the Chamber, likened the proposed trial to the infamous Scopes monkey trial, where a Tennessee school teacher was convicted of teaching evolution in contravention of a state law that was later repealed. Kovacs promised a lawsuit should the EPA refuse to hold such a trial.

The Scopes trial was openly a contest between creationism and science, and creationism won when the judge refused to let Scopes' lawyers present any scientific testimony. The proposed trial would indeed be parallel—antiscience versus real science. It would provide plenty of fodder for Fox News and that side of the street, but whether it would be of any other use, who knows? EPA appears to be resisting the ploy, and it's hard to understand how a court could be persuaded to order such a trial. The Chamber's request is here.

 

Mockery. Derision. Late eighties SNL references. Let us present: Inherit the Hot Air! The US Chamber of Commerce v. Science

Video: http://www.vimeo.com/6282295

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <embed> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options