Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Roadless Area Beats Ski Area! (For Now.)


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Doug Pflugh:
Drillers Make a Play for Thompson Divide

There is no dispute that the Thompson Divide—a 220,000-acre forested wildland in western Colorado—is a special place. It comprises some o...

by Trip Van Noppen:
It's Game Over for Foes of National Forests

Time has run out for the enemies of roadless wilderness. They spent 12 years trying to kill the national law protecting our forests, and yesterday a f...

by Ted Zukoski:
Smokey Loves Coal, Not Forests

The Forest Service finally admitted it. It took the agency two environmental assessment drafts and a draft and final environmental impact statement, ...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Ted Zukoski's blog posts
15 December 2009, 10:13 AM
But is a Colorado senator trying to breathe new life into a bad idea?

On November 5, 2009, something happened in Colorado that hasn't happened in a long, long time: the U.S. Forest Service rejected a proposal to turn a natural area into ski runs and a magnet for private land development.  The natural area is Snodgrass Mountain, which includes inventoried roadless lands, beautiful aspen stands, raptor habitat, and open space.  

Snodgrass rises just north of Mount Crested Butte, the company town whose reason for being is the Crested Butte ski resort to the south.  (The old mining-turned-tourist town of Crested Butte is a few miles further down the road.)  The resort has had its eye on Snodgrass for years. 

And for just as long, local conservationists have been trying to protect America's public lands on Snodgrass from being turned into a site for clearcut runs and lift towers.  Snodgrass is beloved as open space on the edge of development, as a place to hike, mountain bike and ride horses, and as wildlife habitat.

At the center of the battle is the Forest Service, which owns and manages the land, and has, for years, rarely seen a ski area expansion it couldn't approve.

So it was a pleasant surprise when GMUG National Forest Supervisor Charlie Richmond said "thanks, but no thanks" to the resort's expansion.  Supervisor Richmond found the proposal to develop Snodgrass was not in the public interest, since it lacked community support, would spur development of ranchland, and would build lift towers and log in a roadless area and lynx habitat.  

If the story ended there, it would have a happy ending.  But it may not be over yet.

That's because before the ink was dry on Supervisor Richmond's courageous decision, development proponents sought out Colorado's Senator Mark Udall, often a voice for environmental protection, for help.  And they got some.

Senator Udall fired off a letter to Richmond's boss on November 30 urging the Forest Service to "reconsider" the environmentally protective decision.  Why?  Udall claims he doesn't have a position on the proposal, it's just that the public (which has been debating the issue for years) should have been given an opportunity to comment on the ski resort's proposal through the National Environmental Policy Act's (NEPA's) process for evaluating proposed federal actions.

Let's be clear.  The NEPA process which IS critically important to shedding light on the environmental impacts and giving the public a voice in decisions.  It's rightly called "our basic national charter for protection of the environment."  And where a federal agency is proposing to take some action, like moving forward with a permit application - something the Forest Service has NOT done with Snodgrass - it has a duty to undertake a rigorous analysis of environmental impacts, possible alternative actions, and give the public a chance to comment.   

But is it really Senator Udall's zeal to defend NEPA process that led him try to breathe new life into developing Snodgrass?

One could be excused for believing otherwise.  After all, Senator Udall has not always stood on principle to defend the sanctity of NEPA process or public participation.  In fact, he just introduced a bill to 'streamline' (read, undermine) NEPA analysis for projects to address beetle kill on national forests.  The bill is based in part on previous legislation (the "Healthy Forests Restoration Act") that Udall supported, and that also undercut NEPA compliance and public oversight.

Maybe it has more to do with the fact that ski areas are big business, important to Colorado's economy. - but, so, too, are open space, beauty and wildlife.  When federal employees make a good decision to protect wildlife, ranchland and open space, they deserve a pat on the back from those who support environment. 

It's too bad Senator Udall didn't see it that way. 

Good for the forest service. It's time to protect more of our public land from the real estate developers. I'm surprised too that Udall caved so early. It really seems that he does not fully understand the NEPA process as it pertained to Crested Butte and Snodgrass.

This was a real estate ploy from the get go. Nobody actually thinks that the skiing on Snodgrass would be worth getting to (45 min. by lift!!!). Beginners would have to be bussed there.

The forest service has plenty of reasons to deny this and I feel confident that CBMRs appeal will not amount to much.

The Forest Service should quickly and firmly say no to Morris Udall that further review is not necessary to preserve the area as it is being preserved by the decision not to develop the area! There is no change planned so NEPA does not have give the public the opportunity to keep nothing from happening or to make sure the change (there is going to be any) doesn't have environment impacts or provide alternative actions because there are no impacts to no actions taken! Send it back as the nonsense that it is and a ploy for delaying the final decision which in reality has already been made. Maybe he knows it's a waste of time and he is just appeasing some special interests that are trying to buy his loyalty. Nevertheless, Senator Udall should get a strong razzing from those who want to protect the environment no matter how much money is thrown his way to profit from its development.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.