Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Chevron Drills Empty Op-Ed

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Maggie Caldwell:
What Has Been Causing These Historic Droughts?

In a world where a forest the size of Germany is leveled and burned every year... where formerly fertile farmlands have been reduced to desert...where...

by Jessica Knoblauch:
Explosive Crude By Rail Rolls Into Main Street America

Is crude by rail coming to a town near me? For weeks, I’ve been asking myself that question as I kept hearing about the skyrocketing number of ...

by Paul Cort:
A Puzzler: How Can Weaker Air Regs Create Cleaner Air?

For as long as I have been working on air pollution issues in California, I can still be left speechless by agency decision-making—such as the r...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Tom Turner's blog posts
08 June 2009, 12:12 PM

The San Francisco Chronicle carried an extensive package of opinion this weekend (Sunday, June 7) on energy and global warming and the economy that's worth a look-see.

They led with the head of Chevron, possibly because he was outnumbered, out-argued, and out flanked by what followed. His piece (read it for yourselves) was empty, vapid, and one wonders who in the PR department pulls down six figures to write this pap. "We must work together," "we're all on the same side," and like that.

Next came Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, and one very smart dude. His piece was a little heavy on numbers but did a good job of outlining how the green energy future will be an economic boon.

Then they trotted out George Will, who used to be a solid and interesting conservative voice but has been getting crankier and less compelling over the years. He leaned heavily on a piece by Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger in The New Republic. They're "The Death of Environmentalism guys," and they're still hammering away on the conservation movement for not melting away into the larger progressive movement. At least I guess that's what they're ranting away about.

Lastly, our own Trip Van Noppen, who explained succinctly why Pope is right and Chevron is wrong—the answer being that the oil companies deserve much of the credit for getting us into this mess and are now trying to sound all reasonable and cuddly.

All taken together, I expect the package probably left most readers rather baffled, though our side came out ahead. Way ahead. Check it out.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.