Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Talking Out of Both Sides of Their Oily Mouths

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Jessica Knoblauch:
Explosive Crude By Rail Rolls Into Main Street America

Is crude by rail coming to a town near me? For weeks, I’ve been asking myself that question as I kept hearing about the skyrocketing number of ...

by Sarah Saylor:
House Passes Its Polluter Protection Act

Today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Polluter Protection Act (H.R. 3826). This bill stops the EPA from setting modest, sensible limits ...

by Tom Turner:
Fears Ramp Up As Oil Rolls into Albany

Maybe you've seen the riveting photographs of fireballs and burning houses and oiled and blackened streams and marshes. Train cars carrying crude oil ...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Ted Zukoski's blog posts
15 October 2009, 8:41 AM
Industry has change of attack—not heart—over "fracking"

What a difference a year makes! Or maybe not.

Last year, the oil and gas industry and its supporters were spending tens of thousands of dollars in Colorado to attack some modest proposals to protect the state's property owners and public health from the natural gas boom that was consuming the western part of the state.

They hired lobbyists. They papered the state with glossy mailers. They bused in oil field workers to talk about their families. They said the regulations would kill jobs and cause the industry to flee to... um, somewhere else. Maybe someplace where the politicians cared less about about healthy families, property rights, clean air, clean water and wildlife habitat.

And even after the regulations were repeatedly watered down to address the industry's concerns, the Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA) sued to overturn the rule, calling them "the most costly and burdensome" in the nation. (Earthjustice is representing groups helping the state defend the rule.)

Fast forward to this summer, when COGA flack Kathy Hall began surprisingly singing the state rule's praises—and citing Earthjustice's support as the ultimate seal of approval—in an op-ed that was reprinted last month all over Colorado's oil patch.

A sudden change of heart from industry, heralding an Age of Aquarius in which Colorado's drillers lie down with regulators? Nope. Just stunning hypocrisy, nicely skewered by Denver Post colmunist Susan Greene in a recent column.

You see, COGA was praising the "strict oversight" from Colorado's rule because it wants to undermine a proposed national rule to protect us from the dubious industry practice known as "fracking" or "fraccing" (in which chemicals are injected into the ground to fracture geologic formations to release natural gas). 

Some critics of fracking fear the chemicals industry is poisoning groundwater. But it's hard to tell since industry won't even disclose what's in the soup going down-hole. Since they won't tell us, we can only assume it's probably not safe to drink.

Responding to these concerns, Rep. Dianne DeGette of Denver has introduced a bill to regulate fracking.

Apparently, COGA's best argument for opposing DeGette's bill is that Colorado is already taking care of the problem. Except that if COGA has anything to say about it (out of the other side of its mouth), Colorado won't be doing anything about fracking either.  

Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.