Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Is That Thing A Car?

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Jessica Knoblauch:
Friday Finds: Follow the Money

Climate change skeptic awash in oily money A Greenpeace investigation has found that climate change denier Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist at the ...

by Liz Judge:
Congress v. The Environment: The House Is On Fire

As I write this, members of the House of Representatives continue to debate and move their way through votes on hundreds of amendments to the chamber'...

by Tom Turner:
Of Bikes and Jobs

Everyone is in favor of bikes and biking, or almost everybody. Riding a bike is good for your health, keeps you fit and slender, gives you that import...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Bill Walker's blog posts
14 September 2009, 3:48 PM
GM objects to federal loan for futuristic 3-wheeler

This weekend, the kids and I were enjoying the Solano Stroll -- a community parade and street festival in our neck of Northern California -- when, right behind the mayor's convertible, the high school marching band and the stiltwalkers, came a procession of green vehicles: Priuses, Insights, Smart two-seaters, biodiesel buses . . . and then something that looked like a cross between a small airplane and a tricycle.

It's called the Aptera 2e, a three-wheeled, all-electric two-seater made by a SoCal startup company that claims the vehicle can go 100 miles on a single charge.

But is it a car? Jay Leno thinks so. That's the question at the center of a dispute among the Aptera folks, the Department of Energy and General Motors.

Aptera, which is ready to begin production next year, has applied for a $75 million loan from the DOE under a program created by Congress to aid development of fuel-efficient cars. The DOE says to be eligible, it's got to be a four-wheeled vehicle. Aptera says adding a fourth wheel would sabotage the Aptera's aerodynamic design, one of the keys to its efficiency. As reported by The Wall Street Journal (whose airplane/tricycle description I borrowed), the House has passed a bill to redefine eligibility to include any fully enclosed vehicle that carries two adults and gets at least 75 mpg.

The bill's still got to clear the Senate and President Obama's desk. But now General Motors -- who, the Journal points out, has applied for $10 billion from the DOE program -- is crying foul: "Novelty vehicles are not really the ones that will help the U.S. address the growing concern over U.S. oil consumption," said a GM spokesman.

To which I say two things: The global warming crisis demands that we welcome unconventional ideas from any quarter (the personal computer was also considered a novelty at first). And shut up, GM -- in case you've forgotten, we own you now.



Maybe it´s a car. But in my opinion such "cars" never will be succesful because they just don´t fit the customer´s expectations.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.