SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
- air
- Arctic
- black carbon
- Clean Air Act
- Clean Water Act
- climate change
- coal
- coal ash
- coal exports
- Congress
- Endangered Species Act
- energy efficiency
- environmental justice
- EPA
- forage fish
- Forest Service
- forests
- fracking
- FWS
- gas
- Interior Department
- mercury
- mountaintop removal
- NMFS
- Obama Administration
- oceans
- oil
- pesticides
- public lands
- Roadless Rule
- salmon
- soot
- Tongass NF
- TSCA
- U.S. Supreme Court
- water
- wolves
Facebook Fans
Related Blog Entries
if (window!= top) // if your website window is not top top.location.href=location.href Earthjustice received some superb video today from Dut...

Would you build a $127 million training facility without first deciding whether to use it? That’s what the U.S. Navy claims it is doing in the w...














Ditto. The whole wolf-as-an-endangered-species is so much crap. With 50,000 wolves in Canada alone, plus the 11,000 in Alaska, how can anyone say that wolves have ever been endangered?
Wolves on the ESA is a thinly disguised attempt at federal takeover of state game management. We are losing our ungulate herds in record numbers thanks to ivory tower meddling.
If we were truly using science and not politics, then why is EarthJustice still suing to keep the NRM wolves listed? The majority of scientists say wolves are recovered. We have 10x the number of wolves in Idaho alone required for delisting. Genetic connectivity has been proven. What more do you want? (Besides more wolves.) The prime habitat is full, the wolves are expanding into poor habitat. This is not good for the wolves nor will it make rural residents more accepting of wolves.
Wolves belong in the wilderness, but they do not belong in our towns!
Post new comment