Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Offshore Oil Plan Continues to Threaten Northern Alaska Seas

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Terry Winckler:
Massive Attacks on Environment Launched in Congress

Teabag by teabag, the anti-environment faction in the House of Representatives has filled its federal government spending bil...

by Trip Van Noppen:
Back to the Bush Leagues on Arctic Drilling?

In the Arctic waters surrounding Alaska, George W. Bush is still president, but Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has the chance to inaugurate a new regi...

by Bill Walker:
400 Scientists Call for Time Out on Drilling in America's Arctic

More than 400 scientists from around the world have signed a letter urging the Obama administration to call a time out on offshore oil and gas drillin...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Jared Saylor's blog posts
31 March 2010, 3:48 PM
Obama administration sends mixed signals on drilling
The Chukchi Sea. Photo: Florian Schulz /

Today, the Obama administration sent a mixed signal on offshore oil drilling, a move guaranteed to raise concerns from native groups, environmentalists, and communities living near some of the most sensitive and biologically diverse coastal areas. Obama and Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced a plan to halt oil and gas leasing in Bristol Bay off Alaska's southwestern coast and to postpone future lease sales in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas, off Alaska's northern coast, while needed missing information is gathered.

We agree that Salazar made the right move on Bristol Bay—home of the world’s largest salmon fishery—and on postponing future oil and gas lease sales in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas, sensitive areas of America's Arctic Ocean that are undergoing dramatic shifts due to climate change and about which large gaps in basic scientific information remain. These proposals give the administration the chance to use sound science and smart planning in future decisions about new leasing in the Arctic.

Secretary Salazar's proposal, however, only takes some of the steps needed for real, substantive protections for America's Arctic Ocean. Although today's proposal would postpone future lease sales in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas, it would uphold Bush-era leases in almost 2.8 million acres of the Chukchi Sea and allow exploration drilling to move forward in both seas starting as early as this summer—decisions Earthjustice is currently challenging in court.

The Secretary still has a chance to reverse this Bush-era leasing, done hurriedly and without the science the Secretary agrees is necessary to develop. But his current course undercuts his commitment to drilling "in the right places and the right ways." The proposed plan unnecessarily, and blindly, puts the Arctic Ocean, its wildlife, and its traditional Native coastal communities at risk in the short term even while it commits to more study in the future.

Even the Minerals Management Service acknowledges that oil activities in the Chukchi Sea are expected to result in unavoidable adverse impacts to wildlife in the region. Much more scientific study is needed before such potentially destructive activity can proceed. Secretary Salazar needs to listen to science on every offshore drilling decision, not just some. The Secretary should halt oil and gas activity in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas while the administration's scientists gather basic missing biological information needed to make responsible and informed management decisions about the region.

The Chukchi Sea is a portion of the Arctic Ocean north of the Bering Strait and west of the Beaufort Sea. It provides rich feeding grounds and habitat for a variety of marine life. Endangered species reside there such as bowhead whales, gray whales, beluga whales, walrus, polar bears, and spectacled and Steller's eiders. At least 98 species of fish, including Pacific salmon and Arctic Cod are found in the Chukchi.

The Chukchi Sea is the center of the culture, identity and subsistence way of life of Inupiat communities along its coast, and provides them with food, clothing, and materials for traditional arts. Over 71 percent of Point Hope households obtain half or more of their food from harvesting local Chukchi Sea resources.

No technology exists to clean up oil spills that occur in the ice and treacherous seas of America's Arctic Ocean. An oil spill in this region would devastate this area and cause irreparable harm. Salazar will hold a public comment period soon on today's announcement, and we'll be calling upon you to let him know that we need him to take all the steps necessary for protecting America's Arctic Ocean. All offshore drilling decisions, not just some, should be based on sound science.

renewable resource development needs to be implemented, use of petroleum oil in shampoos, lotions, pharmaceutical drugs, paints, pesticides, and other detrimental chemicals used in our homes, need to be stopped, it not only is contaminating and destroying the environment, it is killing all our living cell functions, in our homes and bodies. plastics need to stop production, it is a killer container for foods we eat, its products are killing the sea mammals, and all else, it needs to stay under the earth, it is causing earth quakes, global warming is causing floods and hurricanes, and temperature flunctuations is going to turn our polar world into the ice age. scientists know that, yet it is kept secret.

Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition

The statement that, "No technology exists to clean up oil spills that occur in the ice and treacherous seas of America's Arctic Ocean." seems to be one of the most gross understatements of our current times given that we have not yet come forth with the technology that "exists to clean up oil spills that occur in the" gulf which has no ice nor treacherous seas at this time. With the beginning of hurricane season, I'm looking forward to the efforts to be expended that will prove to be more effective that which the world has seen so far.

Not being a duly elected official nor the most completely informed citizen of the U.S. makes me ignorant to an unimaginable degree. I feel confident however in asserting the need for more research and if necessary development of proven technology to combat potential oil spills, leaks and disasters. Taking on a new project knowing that you don't have all the components needed to make it workable and safe for those who WILL be affected is ethically and morally reprehensible.

For me its like the difference between pre-meditated murder and an accidently murder. In the best of worlds neither one should happen. Those who know better KNOW BETTER than to start this project NOW.

STOP IT NOW BEFORE IT IS OUT OF HUMAN CONTROL. Apologies for the losses later will not soothe.

What will you say after, "Oops, that is all gone?"

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.