Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Sen. Murkowski: How Do You Manage To Keep Shocking Us?


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Liz Judge:
Congress v. The Environment: The House Is On Fire

As I write this, members of the House of Representatives continue to debate and move their way through votes on hundreds of amendments to the chamber'...

by Marty Hayden:
America's Values, Environment on Chopping Block in Congress

House Republicans are using the oft-repeated refrain of “fiscal restraint” as their excuse for gutting several environmental initiatives t...

by Terry Winckler:
Massive Attacks on Environment Launched in Congress

Teabag by teabag, the anti-environment faction in the House of Representatives has filled its federal government spending bil...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Liz Judge's blog posts
13 May 2010, 3:14 PM
Argues for billion-dollar oil company spill bailout amid ongoing Gulf spill

Here are some facts that should provide sufficient context for the *wildly outrageous* move Sen. Murkowski pulled on the floor of the Senate today. My colleagues' blogs on unEARTHED within the last few weeks provide much, much more background and context—definitely check those out if you haven't already (you can start here and here).

But for expediency's sake right now, thought I'd share just a few among a dizzying array of scary truths about the damage this oil spill is doing to our ecosystems, wildlife, fisheries, national economy—just to bring it home before getting to Murkowski's latest:

  • Crude oil is currently gushing into the Gulf of Mexico at the rate of 210,000 gallons each day.
  • After three weeks of continued spilling of oil into the Gulf and several attempts to stop the leak, BP is still unable to stop the oil from flowing. A number of extreme, exhorbitantly expensive, and even sci-fi-style-futuristic measures (involving very pricey underwater robots) to stop the leak have been attempted—and all failed.
  • An estimated 5 million gallons of oil just so far are now promising catastrophe for the region's fishing industries, fragile ecosystems, endangered species, and hundreds of miles of coastline.
  • Scientists are questioning the toxicity and environment effects of the 400,000 gallons of chemical dispersants already dumped into the Gulf to break up the oil before it hits shore.
  • House hearings on the disaster and probes into the cause have revealed in the past few days that this historic catastrophe was caused by a series of equipment failures that could have been and should have been prevented.
  • One key step BP should have taken, but didnt't: When building the Deepwater Horizon rig, BP decided to save $500,000 by not installing a remote-control shut-off switch that could have prevented this whole disaster and tragedy.
  • Today, BP announced that the cost of responding to the disaster has amounted to some $450 million so far—and that's a cool $100 million more than estimates projected just a few days ago.
  • In a Reuters article today, some analysts predicted the costs of the spill could exceed $14 billion.
  • There is a 1986 law that says that in the event of an oil spill, the oil company is only liable for $75 million worth of damages.


So onto to what Murkowski did today on the Senate floor:

In response to the facts above, three Senators—Lautenberg (D-NJ), Menendez (D-NJ), and Bill Nelson (D-FL)—tried to bring their bill, the Big Oil Bailout Prevention Liability Act of 2010, which they introduced with a number of senators to prevent companies like BP from getting off the hook and leaving the American taxpayers and coastal communities with the astronomical bill after devastating spills, to a unanimous vote for passage. The Act would raise the liability cap on oil companies from $75 million to a much more appropriate $10 billion. Their efforts were blocked by none other than Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who argued that though a higher cap is necessary, this cap would prevent "mom & pop" oil companies from drilling. Her lone vote against the legislation blocked it from passage.

Maybe it would be funny if it weren't so sad. Maybe.

This may sound too preposterous to be true, but sadly it is true. You just have to read Grist's David Roberts' brilliant synopsis of the audacity of this transparent Murkowski move.

Then make sure to read McClatchy's Lesley Clark's play-by-play of how the whole thing went down on the Senate floor this afternoon.

Just an example of another bought off politician. She obviously doesn't care about the good of the country or it's people. She's just another politician who's in it for him/her self. This moron should be removed from office ASAP. Our Government needs a major overhaul. Come November, let your voice be heard. Vote out as many incumbents as possible.

I totally agree. She should be removed for this kind of act. I plan on voting!

Seriously, how many "Mom and Pop" oil companies are drilling in deep water?

I live in South Louisiana. My husband works in the oil industry. I'm not an expert on the oil industry but I have never heard of a mom and pop drilling company. Sure there are plenty of mom and pop oil service companies from tools and equipment. This Senator is just another Palin.

It's the same class war we've been waging forever. For those on "The List" profit is private but any downside costs are socialized. By way of illustration I offer the simple ratchet as a physical representation of this policy. Since the top 1% already own almost everything it makes me think "now you're just piling on and being mean on top of your abnormal greed." It's well past time that we realigned the pawl so the ratchet works in the the other direction.

Is FEE FOR SERVICE LEGISLATION, so obviously illustrated by the current Senator Murkowski's protection of big oil, so entrenched in our system that it's unstoppable?

When is the administration going to stop whining about corruption in the Near East and do something about the big buck free for all in our own congress?

"Mom & Pop" oil companies SHOULD be prevented from drilling. If they don't have the funds to put in the proper protections in the first place, or clean up the mess in the second place, then they shouldn't be drilling!!!

You are so right! If BP is complaining about the cost how in the hell is a "MOM AND POP CO." going to afford the cost of drilling!

Hey, Murkowski! How much did ya make off of THAT stunt?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.