Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

America to EPA: Do More, Not Less


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Sam Edmondson:
#Right2Breathe Recap: EPA Defends Bush-era Loophole

(Clean air is a life saver, which is why Earthjustice is working to ensure that polluters don’t stand in the way of safeguards against air pollu...

by Sam Edmondson:
In Dark House, A Few Lights Shine

The U.S. House of Representatives is a dark place right now. Many of its Republican members are maniacally focused on dismantling scores of health and...

by Sam Edmondson:
Attorneys General Defend Our Right to Breathe

Attorneys general from five states—New York, Maryland, Delaware, Massachusetts and Connecticut—sent a letter today to Rep. Fred Upton (R-M...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Sam Edmondson's blog posts
02 February 2011, 4:46 PM
New survey reaffirms that public wants clean air, health protections
President George H.W. Bush signs Clean Air Act Amendments into law on Nov. 15, 1990. (George Bush Presidential Library and Museum)

Sixty-three percent of Americans want the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “to do more to hold polluters accountable and protect the air and water.” This according to a new survey conducted at the end of January by ORC International.

Rep. John Carter (D-TX)—fast becoming a household name around here—isn’t part of that 63 percent. In early January, Rep. Carter sponsored a resolution to effectively block EPA health protections that will limit emissions of mercury and other dangerous air toxics from cement plants. These protections could prevent the premature death of as many as 2,500 people every year when they take effect in 2013.

Notwithstanding the fact that Rep. Carter has seriously misrepresented the facts in his push to win support for his anti-health resolution, a large majority of Americans generally disagree with his approach. The ORC survey found that 77 percent of Americans—more than three out of every four—say “Congress (should) let the EPA do its job.”

Jim Schermbeck, executive director of the Texas group Downwinders at Risk—an Earthjustice client and longtime force in the campaign to clean up cement plants—finds it surprising that Rep. Carter wants to block these important health protections from taking effect. Schermbeck told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram:

It's certainly strange for someone who doesn't have a single cement plant in their district—and never commented on emissions standards for cement plants in 13 years of litigation and public hearings—to suddenly be concerned about these standards. It's outrageous that he wants to overturn regulations supported by the vast majority of citizens who, unlike him, bothered to comment on the standards when they were up for debate for those 13 years.

On the subject of letting the EPA do its job, Newt Gingrich proposed recently that the agency should be replaced with a new entity—dubbed the Environmental Solutions Agency—that would work closely with business to deliver "smarter regulation." This is an incredibly misguided proposition, and a majority of Americans oppose it. Sixty-seven percent of respondents in the ORC survey disagree with Gingrich's proposal to dismantle the EPA. That's good news. 

It’s important to remember amid the flurry of ongoing attacks on public health protections that the agency’s mission is to protect human health and the environment. Plain and simple. Reducing emissions of toxic air pollutants that cause cancer, birth defects or other serious ailments (think mercury, lead, benzene and dioxins) is a fundamental part of that mission. Reducing cement plants’ emissions of these hazardous pollutants is an important step in the process, and it’s many years overdue.

A quick history lesson: In 1990, George H.W. Bush signed amendments to the Clean Air Act that specifically gave the EPA the authority to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic air pollutants.

Said the former president upon signing the amendments:

In July of 1989, I sent to the Congress a proposal to amend the Clean Air Act of 1970. My proposal was designed to improve our ability to control urban smog and reduce automobile and air toxic emissions, and to provide the enforcement authority necessary to make the law work…

I take great pleasure in signing S. 1630 as a demonstration to the American people of my determination that each and every American shall breathe clean air.

We share the same vision and are working to realize it through our campaign to protect your Right to Breathe.

Please help us local taxpaying citizens of the Pacific Northwest fight the Multinational Company’s and our own corrupt government fight to keep the burning of Woody Biomass out of our area and the Country as a whole. Clean energy, really? Ravaging the forest, the lungs of the Mother Earth to burn for power…Hmm that does not sound very clean or efficient.

Tomorrow those of us who know about what is trying to be sneaked in under the wire are going to be at the Thurston County Complex to stand with the one group of County Commissioner's who is trying to keep hold of a Moratorium stopping the more than 8 planned facilities in our area for at least a year to better understand the benefits (which I see none) and the consequences (of which I and many see a lot of) in the use of Woody Biomass Incineration.

We are the Evergreen State. If these company's are allowed to proceed over the many voices of our people shouting NO.... I fear for our State and the people as a whole. It is just very sad that $$ is more important to Mason County’s government and Tim Sheldon than the voice of the people who will have to not only pay for it in taxes but live with the pollution. It is a crime against the environment and all of the creatures in it. There are cleaner more efficient ways!

Having to bow down to Multinational Business and corrupt government is just the beginning. Who has bought our right to clean air? What has happened to the entities that are supposed to protect the environment? Who has bought them & how do we take them back!

Many other States are fighting this same fight! Let us join together on this! It is not Clean Energy!

Please tell us about ORC. Who is it?

Hi Roberta. Here's some more information for you: http://www.opinionresearch.com/are_corp.shtml

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.