Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Tr-Ash Talk: Please, Not in Their Backyard

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Allie Eisen:
North Carolina Coal Ash Pollution and the Frankenbill

There is a running joke in my hometown about the glowing green fish and three-headed salamanders in Lake Julian. Nestled in the center of Arden, North...

by Lisa Evans:
Groups Across U.S. Unite Against Coal Ash Bill

Seeking protection from unsafe dumping practices, more than 300 public interest groups from 43 states, representing millions across the nation, sent a...

by Lisa Evans:
Tr-Ash Talk: The Good And Bad Coal Ash News

(Note from Lisa Evans: Last week, we nearly lost the battle for Environmental Protection Agency regulations. However, thanks to the chorus of voices f...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Raviya Ismail's blog posts
18 January 2011, 4:29 PM
Low-income community rebels against proposed 15-story toxic coal ash landfill
TVA landfill full of coal ash

(This is the latest in a weekly series of 50 Tr-Ash Talk blogs discussing the dangers of coal ash. Earthjustice hopes that by December 2011, the third anniversary of the TVA coal ash spill, the EPA will release a coal ash rule establishing federally enforceable regulations ensuring the safe disposal of this toxic waste.)

The average home value in Round O, South Carolina, is just above $66K. The average household income is below $30K. And now, according to an article in a local newspaper, a power company plans on building a site to store toxic coal ash from its coal plant nearby.

Is it coincidental that these impoundments are often built near low-income communities? We think not. It’s a known phenomenon that low-income and people of color neighborhoods across the country face disproportionately high levels of air and water pollution and exposure to toxic waste and other health hazards because federal environmental laws often are not fairly enforced. And sadly, Round O, fits the profile.

While we wait on the EPA to release a federally enforceable coal ash rule that would ensure the safe disposal of this toxic waste, President Barack Obama has signed an executive order that aims to achieve "balance" in federal regulations -- between ensuring public health and safety and promoting economic growth.

Obama ordered a comprehensive review of federal regulations to rid the government of rules that are outdated and harmful to the economy. This housecleaning is a necessary task for our government agencies but must not replace the goals set by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to address some of the greatest threats to our health and environment, including the regulation of the toxic byproduct of burning coal. It’s the only way communities like Round O will get any protection.

The story about the 6,000-person community describes it as one that "includes mobile homes and small houses, as well as farms that have been in families for generations." One source is quoted saying: "They always put things like this in poor communities because they don’t vote and they don’t say nothing."

But this community is plenty angry. They are gathering in numbers and pushing the local city council to formally oppose the 15-story coal ash landfill.

After the 2008 TVA coal ash disaster, communities are not so willing to be neighbors to a toxic coal ash pond. And they have plenty reason to be afraid: coal ash is filled with arsenic, lead, cadmium, mercury, selenium, and many other dangerous pollutants that can cause cancer and damage the nervous system and other organs, especially in children. For years, power and coal companies have been dumping poisonous coal ash into unlined landfills and unsafe ponds. Never mind another TVA-like disaster, this stuff can leak into your drinking water.

These residents aren’t stupid. It’s not just any old landfill. It’s one filled with something much more dangerous.

"Certainly no one wants a trash dump, but this is not a trash dump," said Bill Hiott in the article. "It’s contaminated waste being put in the ground."

The EPA must keep its eye on the prize. There are probably very few benign substances on the agency’s hazardous waste list. In fact, today the EPA should be much more concerned with what is missing from that list — toxic coal combustion waste.

Aside from the pollutants mentioned in the article above, there are also radioactive elements that have a half-decay life way beyond that of nuclear waste, and we treat that waste much more carefully than coal ash. Any coal ash dump is a disaster waiting to happen as it is ABOVE ground.

Care should be taken that reduced coal-production over the next few years does not translate (or contribute) to the corporate/media projects of engineering consensus FOR nuclear power.

For once, someone should force the masterminds and CEOs of the coal kings -- or the natural gas goons -- to put these pits, dumps, landfills, and wells in or near their own communities. Only then, perhaps, when faced with the consequences of their own poisonous products and behavior, will they moderate their policies instead of trying to dump off the toxins on communities they assume are powerless or too ignorant to fight back. To these guys, civic virtue is a weakness. Their maneuvers are more gangster than good business.

As bad as coal plant emissions can be, they pale in comparison to the effects of coal ash, as it is allowed to be disposed of currently, on the health of people living in the vicinity of these impoundments, and on people whose homes are being built with toxic compounds. Meanwhile, the new EPA "regulations" are being bought with coal dollars, and abetted by pro-industry puppeteers with their hands on Obama?s strings. You can be sure these same people are lobbying the Green Building Council to allow coal ash in LEED-approved structures. The coal industry's growing list of paid apologists now includes CNN, which, according to the following After the Press video report, aired a story recently about a giant coal ash dump on the W. Va./Penn border -- with the "report" in fact sponsored by an airbrushed spot for The Coalition for Clean Coal:

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.