Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Longview Coal Export Terminal Application Withdrawn


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by David Lawlor:
Proposal For Longview Coal Export Terminal Returns

They’re baaack! The shipping and logistics company Millennium Bulk Terminals last week filed applications for federal, state and county permits...

by David Lawlor:
Video: Coal Export Threatens The Northwest

Would you want to live next door to a coal export terminal? Wait, maybe that’s too vague of a question. Instead, let me ask you this… W...

by David Lawlor:
What It Means To Be A Resource Colony

(Editor's Note: This is the fourth blog post in an ongoing series about proposed coal export terminals in the Pacific Northwest. Upcoming blog posts w...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View David Lawlor's blog posts
18 March 2011, 4:35 PM
Earthjustice plays a key role in thwarting the environmentally harmful project
Coal train photo courtesy of Surfrider Foundation

Residents of Longview, Wash., can exhale a sigh of relief today, secure in the knowledge that their health will not be jeopardized by a coal shipping terminal. Australian-based Ambre Energy and its subsidiary Millennium Bulk Logistics announced this week that the companies are withdrawing a permit application to construct a coal export facility in Longview on the shores of the Columbia River. Earthjustice played a leading role in opposing the terminal and informing the public about the environmentally harmful project.

Millennium had proposed building what would have been the first West Coast port in the United States to transport coal—the largest source of carbon pollution—across the Pacific Ocean. The coal, sourced from mines in Wyoming and Montana, would have been shipped to China to fuel that nation’s coal-fired power plants. In its permit application to Cowlitz County, Millennium said it planned to ship about 6 million tons of coal annually from the proposed terminal. But court records reviewed by Earthjustice attorneys revealed that the company planned to boost the annual shipping capacity of the terminal from about 6 million tons to a staggering 80 million tons.

Revelations of Millennium’s deception were widely reported by Northwest news media outlets and even The New York Times covered the story. After the project’s deceitful roots were exposed, sentiment built in opposition to the terminal. The prospect of pollution from the site endangering the health of Longview’s citizens also did little to garner support.

While stopping the Longview project is a significant victory, the coal industry still desires to establish a coal shipping terminal on America’s West Coast. As China’s economy continues to modernize, interest is growing among the industry’s major players, such as Arch Coal and Peabody Energy, in shipping coal to the world’s most populated country. A similar coal export facility was proposed at the Port of Tacoma late last year, but port officials rejected the project. Talks are currently underway about a possible coal export facility in Bellingham, Wash., near the Canadian border.

Earthjustice attorneys continue to engage in strategic litigation to level the playing field between polluting energy sources such as coal, and clean sources such as wind and solar. By using the law and the courts to force the coal industry to internalize the full cost of coal’s dirty life cycle, cleaner energy sources become economically competitive, decreasing the demand for coal. This big picture approach means that, over time, the appeal of constructing a coal shipping terminal on America’s West Coast will lose much of its luster.
 

"Thank God they (wind farms) were there." - Are you delusional? Wind accounts for less than 1% of Japan's electricity generation. Nuclear is close to 25%. There is no way wind power can help the Japanese replace the lost nuclear capacity. Fossil fuels (whether coal or natural gas) are the only way to do so quickly and cheaply. Either a lot of poor, unfortunate Japanese will be without power and essentially living in poverty, or they can rebuild their lives with the help of fossil fuels.

Actually, the wind farms of Japan survived the tragedy and are still providing power to the grid. Thank God they were there. They have proven their worth and should be expanded. http://www.grist.org/article/2011-03-18-japans-wind-farms-save-its-ass-w...

Though coal supporters will try to use the tragedy of Japan to push their polluting agenda, most modern societies will now move towards distributed and sustainable energy sources that don't lead to asthamatic children in emergency rooms or poisoned fish in our lakes (coal), or evacuation plans and permanently destroyed agriculture zones. (nuclear.)

1) The town of Longview could certainly use the jobs and economic benefits from this port. I guess you don't care about people's livelihoods

2) This coal could be used by Japan to rebuild from the devastating nuclear accidents. Wind or solar or anything else this group would like to see are not a near-term option to replace the baseload nuclear power that is lost. How dare you deny these people the chance to rehabilitate their lives.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.