Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Creek Memories & Our Fight For Clean Water in America


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Liz Judge:
House Appropriators Slash Environmental, Health Safeguards

The 112th Session of the House of Representatives is at it again, doing what they do best: writing legislation to strike and block the clean air and c...

by Liz Judge:
Congress v. The Environment: The House Is On Fire

As I write this, members of the House of Representatives continue to debate and move their way through votes on hundreds of amendments to the chamber'...

by Liz Judge:
How Clean Are Your Local Waterways?

You know that creek in your backyard, or the river or lake near your town? Have any idea what kind of condition it is in, or how polluted it is? ...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Liz Judge's blog posts
14 November 2011, 2:17 PM
Will the Senate defeat a Dirty Water Amendment this week?
The Barrasso/Heller Dirty Water Amendment would wipe out pollution limits for streams, brooks, wetlands, lakes and other waters in every state.

From early morning tadpole pursuits to sunset creek walks, my summer days started and ended in the creek that ran behind my home. My dad built a bridge across the creek, but for our neighborhood gang of rascals, well, there was no use for such bridges when we could splash and wade right through that water. Whether we were forging the stream or sitting cross-legged in it with our heads above the water, exploding with impish giggles, this creek was as much our home as our bedrooms 50 yards away. And when we outgrew the shallow waters of our backyard creek, my siblings and I took our energies to nearby Lake Erie, where we swam in deeper, more mysterious waters.

Many people have memories of swimming, fishing, wading, visiting, or skipping rocks in waters during their youth—whether those ran through their hometowns or were the destinations of family travels. That these waters were safe for recreation—or even drinking water—was no accident. Our nation’s Clean Water Act is the force that has allowed us to fish and swim and sip our water without ill consequences.

But today, the Clean Water Act and 59 percent of our nation’s streams and headwaters are in peril. The danger facing our nation’s waters, along with all the little kids who want to play in them, has arrived in an amendment by Senators John Barrasso (R-WY) and Dean Heller (R-NV).

As early as this Wednesday, Senators Barrasso and Heller will ask senators to vote for their Dirty Water Amendment, effectively repealing key pieces of the Clean Water Acts.

Sens. Barrasso and Heller are trying to attach their Dirty Water Amendment to a spending bill. If it passes, it would wipe out pollution limits for streams, brooks, wetlands, lakes and other waters in every state. Specifically, the amendment would block a long-overdue Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers guidance to restore decades of Clean Water Act safeguards to 59 percent of our nation’s streams and headwaters and 20 million acres of wetlands.

These waters were stripped of protections by two Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006 that misread and muddled the law. As a result, the EPA and the Corps are working on a guidance that would restore those protections, but the Dirty Water Amendment would kill this effort and bar the agencies from clarifying the confusion about how the Clean Water Act should protect our waters.

This alarming amendment isn’t the first pro-polluter gift that’s infiltrated the Senate over the last few days. Last week, another piece of Rep. Eric Cantor's toxic pro-polluter agenda slithered into the Senate, as the upper chamber voted on two dirty and dangerous pieces of legislation with House origins. Those two bills, written to benefit a narrow set of corporations at the expense of the broad American public, were sponsored by Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and John McCain (R-AZ). Thankfully, our Senate beat back those sneak-attacks and voted them down. Those bills would have cost tens of thousands of American lives each year, so the Senate's rejection suggests that some in our Capitol are still looking after the American people and our health and well-being.

We hope that the Senate exhibits the same responsibility and decency toward all Americans this week when the Barrasso/Heller Dirty Water Amendment comes up for a vote.

While it’s clear that the House is determined to continue to advance and pass this sort of ill-conceived legislation, we are leaning on the Senate even more heavily to stop these blatant giveaways to polluter special interests. It is crucial that our senators rise above special interests and act in the interest of what is best for our nation’s families, communities, and health, and vote against this Dirty Water amendment when the spending bill comes up this week. Please email your senators now and tell them to oppose this Dirty Water Amendment!

We do not see the time spent on this site, so everything is exciting ... what a great generosity of us share your knowledge for free .
voyance

Oh my! How uninformed are you Ms. Judge! This is already addressed in local and federal laws. The EPA and the Corp are over reaching it authority and that is the reason for bill. As I state above, this is already addressed by local authorities and I urge you to contact your local Soil and Water Conservation office so they may explain this. SWCDs are one of the most important local units of Government and most people do not even know they exist. Please do more research prior to publishing these type of incorrect and harmful articles.

Hi there --

Soil and Water Conservation Districts play an important and useful role in helping landowners and communities with water conservation and water- and land-related issues, developing best practices and water management plans for landowners and communities, and advising local watershed stakeholders. But the federal Clean Water Act is about preventing water pollution at its source, and Congress expressly and explicitly gave that authority to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs) have ZERO authority to prevent water pollution at its source -- meaning they have no ability to prevent water pollution of streams, wetlands, and other bodies of water. They also have no legal authority or ability to tell a polluting source that it has to meet water-quality standards or reduce its pollution. This is why we have the Clean Water Act, and this is why we need to uphold and fight for the Clean Water Act, instead of gut it and shred it as Sens. Barrasso and Heller are trying to do.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.