Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Shell's Promise To Protect Arctic Lost At Sea


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Terry Winckler:
A Reason to Celebrate Earth Day: No Arctic Ocean Drilling

Perhaps you’ve already read the good news by our crackerjack Alaska attorney Holly Harris, who reported that ConocoPhillips is the latest Big Oi...

by Kari Birdseye:

if (window!= top) // if your website window is not top top.location.href=location.href Earthjustice received some superb video today from Dut...

by Trip Van Noppen:
Preparing To Stop Shell's Latest Arctic Scheme

The Palmyra Atoll is a tropical coral reef island in the heart of the Pacific Ocean. It’s warm, tiny and far from the vast, frigid Arctic. And y...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Trip Van Noppen's blog posts
13 July 2012, 9:54 PM
Drilling proposals foreshadow larger struggle over Arctic

(Trip Van Noppen is President of Earthjustice)

Shell Oil’s Arctic drilling plans are premised on a growing legacy of broken promises regarding the company’s ability to protect the fragile Arctic from drilling impacts. And, as in the past, Shell is again asking the federal government to be lenient, accept more empty promises, and let the drilling begin.

This isn’t surprising. It’s a trend we’ve experienced during the last five years of successful legal and public advocacy efforts aimed at keeping Shell out of the Arctic until it proves that it can drill without grievously wounding this magnificent ecosystem.

The latest Shell failure happened a few days ago when Shell announced that one of its two main drilling ships – already in Alaska – couldn’t meet the standards in its air permit from the Environmental Protection Agency. Meanwhile, Shell also is reneging on its commitments to meet Coast Guard standards for its oil spill containment barge. Shell expects the EPA and the Coast Guard to ignore the problems, so Shell can drill this summer.

No matter what the EPA and the Coast Guard decide, Shell hasn’t convinced us it is ready to drill safely in the Arctic Ocean.

Despite many years of promises and assurances, the oil industry remains woefully unprepared to adequately respond to a major oil spill caused by exploration drilling. The nearest Coast Guard station is more than 1,000 miles away. The infrastructure to clean up an oil spill doesn’t exist. And government scientists admit that we have much to learn about the basic ecology of the region as well as the impacts that oil drilling will have on the Arctic environment.

So far, these concerns have largely fallen on deaf ears in the Obama administration, which seems content to rely on the hope that no spills occur on its watch. The administration appears to be on track to allow some exploration drilling to proceed this year, despite Shell’s broken promises.

So until the Obama administration enforces our laws and protects the Arctic, we turn to the courts.

Our work dates back to the early 1970s when Congress was pushing through legislation enabling construction of the trans-Alaska pipeline. Two decades ago, Earthjustice helped keep oil drillers out of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, an effort that has succeeded to this day. And when the Bush/Cheney administration turned its sights on developing oil in the environmentally sensitive and wildlife-rich area known as the National Petroleum Reserve, Earthjustice succeeded in getting key habitat like Teshekpuk Lake put off limits.

And for many years, Earthjustice and our allies also have kept the oil industry from drilling in the Arctic’s fragile offshore waters. We are in court right now, challenging air quality permits issued to Shell and many of the oil leases the government has issued in the Arctic Ocean. Last week, we continued this decades-long fight by challenging Shell’s inadequate oil spill preparedness plan for the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. Despite the lessons that the Obama administration and oil industry claim to have learned from the Gulf oil spill—a mere two years ago—the government has failed to ensure that the oil company is prepared to confront the harsh realities of cleaning up an oil spill in the Arctic.

Since 2000, there have been zero tests of spill response equipment in U.S. Arctic waters. And the tests that were completed before 2000 were deemed a “failure.” Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment to remove oil from the water, but bases its plans for nearshore and coastline cleanup on the assumption that it will recover more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered using booms and skimmers after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills. In the Arctic, sea ice, harsh weather, high seas, darkness and wind may render even that level of cleanup impossible.

Ultimately, our focus needs to be broader than one company as nations, including ours, prepare to extract the Arctic’s energy resources. In fact, other companies have already submitted their own plans to drill in America’s Arctic Ocean. Longer term, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has made clear that the Obama administration plans to lease more of the Arctic Ocean to oil companies.

So, even if government watchdogs ignore Shell’s pattern of broken promises and allow it to move forward on Arctic drilling, the battlelines are being drawn for an even larger fight over one of the world’s last wild places.

**Learn more about how record-breaking ice melt in the Arctic is affecting low-lying communities like the Palmyra Atoll in May's Down to Earth podcast: On Thin Ice.

 

Since when did Shell ever exhibit one iota of morality or decency when more turn-over and profit is in the offing? To find an answer ask 1000's of Southern Nigerians who are victims of Shell's modus operandi.

To answer your question, "Never."

I say "no drilling" until Shell is up to speed on its readiness to handle an inevitable spill. They ought to be able to do this. After all, they sell the most costly gasoline, at least in New England. They have not participated in the price reductions that other companies have offered. They can certainly afford to comply with these reasonable US requirements!

This situation also impacts Canada and the Canadians should be up in arms as well as the Americans...oil is ubiquitous in water...it spreads and will impact all the waters in the area if there is a spill. And we do know there will be a spill, eventually. The fact that Shell knows it and is waving a red flag in front of the EPA and looking for the go-ahead regardless, knowing that the EPA will give it to them despite protests from the public is really a testament to how much our government is in bed with Shell/the oil industry.

This must stop; this must not be allowed. There must be massive protests about this. The Gulf oil spill will be cleaned up for years. We do not know of the impact on those who live on the Gulf. My cousin, who is a marine biologist, says there are still oil balls washing up from the Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster. How many years later is that? Eating fish/shellfish from the Gulf waters should not be allowed, but it is because industry serves itself and humans are the least flotsam considered.

For these reasons, the EPA and others must take a stand against Shell. Finally, this is not an American company. What are they doing in our waters? It is "Royal Dutch" Shell...the controlling interest, if you check out the company is from which country? And on top of that the elites, super elites, royalty have the controlling interest. It is one more revelation of "the divine elites" usurping the world and trashing the little people as their serfs, slaves, peasants, proles, etc. for their own pleasure because they can. They have a history of mowing down the environment, the flora and fauna willy nilly. We should allow them to continue as manifest with this endeavor?

I don't think so.

I pray that the artic is protected from the shell and preserved as a place of peace and wonder for all of its beauty.

Nothing new here. Their position is profit is everything; screw the earth!

Nothing new here. Their position is profit is everything; screw the earth!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.