Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Tr-Ash Talk: We’re Watching Your Vote


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Jared Saylor:
Boxer Throws Punch At Coal Ash

Some members of the Senate believe it’s acceptable to write up legislation to prevent the EPA from regulating toxic coal ash—and then atta...

by Lisa Evans:
Tr-Ash Talk: Legislating Disaster

In the aftermath of a major catastrophe, lawmakers and regulators should be held accountable to create new safety protocols to avert future disasters....

by Jared Saylor:
180 Seconds Of Coal Ash Pollution

Four years ago, a small Tennessee town woke up to a nightmare. A nearby coal ash pond that held back more than a billion gallons of toxic waste collap...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Jared Saylor's blog posts
20 June 2012, 9:47 AM
McKinley offers motion testing House Democrats' concern for public health

It’s Groundhog Day in the House of Representatives. Once again, coal company allies are leading a charge to pass a symbolic vote that would reinforce their disdain for any plans to clean up coal ash ponds and landfills with federal minimum safeguards. But the symbolism has real-world impacts: nearly 200 coal ash sites have already contaminated nearby lakes, rivers, streams and aquifers with dangerous chemicals that cause cancer, organ damage and even death.

Representatives will vote on an arcane Motion to Instruct, which tells the 47 members of the House and Senate who are on the conference committee for a massive transportation bill package to include a bad amendment on coal ash. That amendment snuffs out any possibility for the EPA to set federal regulations for safe coal ash disposal and was attached to the version of the transportation bill the House passed last month.

More than 130 groups sent a letter opposing the amendment. Rather than federal coal ash regulations, the amendment would transfer coal ash cleanup to state jurisdiction, and they have a dismal record at best of containing coal ash pollution (see Kingston, TN).

Despite being home to the biggest coal ash dump site in the country, Rep. David McKinley has carried the torch for Big Coal and introduced legislation that passed the House and stalled in the Senate, and which is identical to the amendment to the transportation bill. No surprise that Rep. McKinley was the one who introduced that amendment.

You may remember other blog posts about Congress’ efforts to kill coal ash protections. This Congress has an ideological pursuit to end any federal environmental protections that force dirty industries to clean up their act. Any members of Congress who vote in favor of including the coal ash amendment in the transportation bill are making a bold statement: they are putting the interests of the polluters ahead of the health of Americans. It’s a sad sight and a reprehensible act, and one that will not be forgotten.

Known* cases of coal ash contamination and spills:

Red icon. Contaminated Site
Green icon. Spill
Black icon. Contaminated Site and Spill

* These cases of documented water contamination are likely to be only a small percentage of the coal ash-contaminated sites in the U.S. Most coal ash landfills and ponds do not conduct monitoring, so the majority of water contamination goes undetected. According to U.S. EPA, there are over 1,000 operating coal ash landfills and ponds and many hundreds of "retired" coal ash disposal sites.

If you're going to point fingers let us know what's in the transportation bill as a whole and let us know who, aside from McKinley is voting for the amendment so we can petition the lawmakers.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options