In his address at the Tribal Nations Conference, President Obama spoke with his usual eloquence about invigorating growth on tribal lands, and the per...
Documentary: An Ill Wind
The Moapa River Indian Reservation, tribal home of a band of Paiute Indians, sits about 30 miles north of Las Vegas—and about 300 yards from the coal ash landfills of the Reid Gardner Power Station. If the conditions are just wrong, coal ash picks up from Reid Gardner and moves across the desert like a sandstorm. The film An Ill Wind tells the Paiute Indians' story. Explore interactive video feature.
Coal ash is the hazardous waste that remains after coal is burned. Dumped into unlined ponds or mines, the toxins readily leach into drinking water supplies.
Toxicologist suggests nation's children can eat toxic ash
Water that has come into contact with coal ash has been found to contain poisonous levels of arsenic, lead and other pollutants at more than 200 sites across the nation.
In Missouri, rape apparently does not cause pregnancy, and it’s OK for children to eat coal ash.
When Missouri Republican Todd Akin said last August that “legitimate rape” rarely results in conception, the congressman caused quite a stir—and this offensive nonsense, broadcast coast to coast, likely cost him a Senate seat.
More provocative baloney was recently heard in Missouri—this time from toxicologist Lisa Bradley about the safety of children eating coal ash—the waste produced by burning coal. Never mind that coal ash contains an alphabet soup of toxic trash, such as arsenic, hexavalent chromium, lead, mercury and a dozen other hazardous metals, Dr. Bradley testified at a public hearing in Union, MO that “a child could consume coal ash every day and have no increased exposure to arsenic.”
Dr. Bradley is a vice president and senior toxicologist at AECOM, a prominent international consulting firm that has received numerous contracts to investigate coal ash sites, including controversial investigations of the Kingston TVA disaster and the Town of Pines Superfund Site.
Ameren's Labadie power plant,
on the Missouri River. (Courtesy of Labadie Environmental Organization)
Her massively misguided missive might have been forgotten, except that last Friday a judge relied on her statement in ruling against a public interest group, Labadie Environmental Organization, who are contesting the construction of a 400-acre, 100-foot tall coal ash landfill in the floodplain of the Missouri River. The landfill, they argue, poses an unreasonable risk of poisoning groundwater, polluting the Missouri River, and elevating the risk of flooding.
In Friday’s decision, the judge specifically cited the toxicologist’s outrageous testimony. Bradley’s willingness to grossly minimize the threat to human health may be related to her seat on the Executive Committee of the American Coal Ash Association (ACAA) the lobbying organization whose membership includes all major coal-burners, including Duke, Southern Company and Ameren, the utility that is fighting to build the landfill in the Missouri floodplain. Bradley is also the same toxicologist who penned the ACAA’s junk science report in June 2012, which claimed that coal ash is as safe as “common dirt.”
Unfortunately, this is not the first time doctors have publicly belittled the risk of eating arsenic-laden ash. Bradley’s statement is reminiscent of the 2009 Congressional testimony of Dr. Donald McGraw, dubbed “Dr. Arsenic,” whose similar remark earned him more than 5,600 hits on You Tube:
This is, however, the first time a toxicologist has publicly and unequivocally stated that coal ash is safe for children to eat daily, and it’s a giant step too far. Dr. Bradley may be playing word games here, as the issue is not the direct consumption of coal ash, but the leaching of toxic metals like arsenic into water that is then consumed by communities unfortunate enough to live near coal ash dumps. Water that has come into contact with ash has been found to contain poisonous levels of arsenic, hexavalent chromium, lead and other pollutants—at more than 200 sites across the nation. Undoubtedly, Bradley has seen the data.
But like former Congressman Akin, Dr. Bradley prefers to make dangerous public statements that obscure the truth and promote the policies of her supporters. Yet lies are like vampires—bright light is deadly.
Missouri is the 'show me' state. Show the American public the data supporting the claim that children can eat coal ash every day without harm. And then show us the children on which you’d like to test your theory.
Submitted by James A. McGrath (not verified) on January 17, 2013.
This situation is biased. The good doctor/expert is on the Executive Committee of the American Coal Ash Association? This connection should be explored perhaps utilizing a discovery package to further investigate who else is receiving financing from this organization, aka "follow the money". I would be curious if any another individual who has been influential in this ruling has connections to any of the good doctors organizations either as a stock holder or indirect recipient of funds by either group. Something is rotten in Missouri and it smells worse than fly ash
Submitted by Teresa Connelly (not verified) on January 18, 2013.
One only needs to go to the website for the Missouri Ethics Commission and search Legislators and/or Candidates to have access to their reports. On that report you will be able to see who their financial donors are/were. You can go back several election cycles.
You may be surpried...and then angry...then maybe people will stop voting for the wrong people who have bigger things than people's health, safety and well-being on the top of their priority list.
Submitted by Steven Gilbert (not verified) on January 16, 2013.
All good scientist and toxicologists know that children are not "little adults" and are thus more vulnerable to the health effects of environmental contaminants. Children eat more, breath more, and drink more per body weight than adults, and therefore receive a greater exposure and dose of any material. In addition, children have unique behaviors such as hand to mouth actions that increase exposure to contaminants. Developing organ systems (including nervous systems) are more vulnerable to adverse effects. Exposure to coal ash and related contaminants are detrimental to a child's health. We have an ethical responsibility to ensure that our children have an environment free of contaminants so the can reach and maintain their full potential. We also have an ethical responsibility to accurately reflect the scientific knowledge.
This situation is biased. The good doctor/expert is on the Executive Committee of the American Coal Ash Association? This connection should be explored perhaps utilizing a discovery package to further investigate who else is receiving financing from this organization, aka "follow the money". I would be curious if any another individual who has been influential in this ruling has connections to any of the good doctors organizations either as a stock holder or indirect recipient of funds by either group. Something is rotten in Missouri and it smells worse than fly ash
One only needs to go to the website for the Missouri Ethics Commission and search Legislators and/or Candidates to have access to their reports. On that report you will be able to see who their financial donors are/were. You can go back several election cycles.
You may be surpried...and then angry...then maybe people will stop voting for the wrong people who have bigger things than people's health, safety and well-being on the top of their priority list.
All good scientist and toxicologists know that children are not "little adults" and are thus more vulnerable to the health effects of environmental contaminants. Children eat more, breath more, and drink more per body weight than adults, and therefore receive a greater exposure and dose of any material. In addition, children have unique behaviors such as hand to mouth actions that increase exposure to contaminants. Developing organ systems (including nervous systems) are more vulnerable to adverse effects. Exposure to coal ash and related contaminants are detrimental to a child's health. We have an ethical responsibility to ensure that our children have an environment free of contaminants so the can reach and maintain their full potential. We also have an ethical responsibility to accurately reflect the scientific knowledge.
Post new comment