Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

FTC Resisting Common-Sense Changes To Refrigerator Labels


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Raviya Ismail:
Unplugged: Improving Energy Efficiency a Gray Box at a Time
Unplugged: Improving Energy Efficiency a Gray Box at a Time

In 2007, we filed a lawsuit challenging the Bush administration's weak energy efficiency standards for electricity distribution transformers, those gr...

by Jonathan Wiener:
Unplugged: Clothes Dryers Need Labels, Too
Unplugged: Clothes Dryers Need Labels, Too

Few household appliances use as much energy or get replaced as rarely as clothes dryers. And unlike with most other household appliances, you won&rsqu...

by Jonathan Wiener:
Unplugged: No More Game of Hide-and-Seek for Consumers
Unplugged: No More Game of Hide-and-Seek for Consumers

If you are one of the millions of American consumers who shop or browse online for major appliances and would like to know the environmental impact yo...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Jonathan Wiener's blog posts
07 March 2013, 9:01 AM
Jonathan Wiener

FTC Resisting Common-Sense Changes To Refrigerator Labels

EnergyGuide and ENERGY STAR labels obscure impact of configurations and features
The addition of a through-the-door ice dispenser can make a big difference in a refrigerator's energy usage.

Would you give ENERGY STAR to a sport-utility vehicle? What about a sport-utility refrigerator?

As with fuel economy for cars, the most important factors affecting a refrigerator’s energy usage include size, design and features. Specifically, the location of the freezer section, the addition of an automatic icemaker, and the addition of a through-the-door ice dispenser can all make a big difference in a model’s energy usage. But the labeling programs designed to promote energy-efficient models instead hide these impacts.

Today’s Energy Guide labels for refrigerators compare energy use only among models that have the exact same configuration and features. ENERGY STAR works the same way, allowing products to carry the mark even if they have the least efficient combination of configurations and features.

Manufacturers like it this way. They profit more from selling the refrigerator equivalent of SUVs. And they know that if consumers find out other designs not only cost less to buy but also lead to less pollution, more consumers might shy away from the high-priced energy hogs.

But that is the point of the Energy Guide label. And it is why Earthjustice and our allies are pushing the Federal Trade Commission to provide information comparing energy use of refrigerators with different configurations and features. If those ranges wind up encouraging consumers to consider switching to a more efficient configuration or design, all the better.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options