Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Calif. Ends Rule That Poisoned Us with Flame Retardants


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Marianne Engelman Lado:
EPA Pulls Two Important Chemical Rules

To say we at Earthjustice are disappointed regarding the recent news that the Environmental Protection Agency has withdrawn two chemical rules would b...

by Raviya Ismail:
Losing a Champion for Air, Water and Land

There was a time that airline travel exposed passengers to a deadly peril: secondhand cigarette smoke. Not so for more than 25 years now, thanks to th...

by Raviya Ismail:
Outdated Toxics Law Exposes Americans to Many Chemicals

Next time I sit down on a couch, I’m going to think twice. Turns out that simple action can accelerate the release of flame retardant chemicals,...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Eve Gartner's blog posts
26 November 2013, 2:10 PM
Beginning in 2014, furniture no longer must be treated with toxics
Chemicals like those used in flame retardants in household furniture often escape as vapor or airborne particles. (PSR LA)

Chemical flame retardants, which are present in a wide array of household products, have been linked to cancer and developmental, neurological and reproductive problems. 

And chances are, if you are sitting on a padded chair or couch, it contains these noxious chemicals. To make matters worse, these chemicals are not sealed into the furniture and so they migrate into the air and attach to house dust. Most Americans, especially those living in California, have high body burden levels of flame retardants with children having the highest levels. Wastewater transports these chemicals into the outdoor environment where they have been detected in surface waters, sediments and wildlife around the globe. 

The reason most furniture sold in this country contains flame retardants is a 1975 California regulation called TB 117, which requires furniture foam to withstand an open flame for 12 seconds before igniting. Because the vast majority of furniture fires start from cigarettes, which smolder rather than flame, the open flame standard has been shown to be largely ineffective at curtailing furniture fires. In other words, much of our furniture contains flame retardants that end up in our bodies and our children’s bodies, but that do not protect us from fires. Thankfully, last week California revised its flammability regulations, changing them from a chemical-dependent open flame standard, to a smolder standard that can be met with non-toxic fabrics. Taking effect starting in January 2014, the new rule eliminates the need for furniture makers to inject the chemicals into upholstered chairs, sofas, and other items.

Given the widespread presence of flame retardants in consumer products containing foam, this change comes none too soon. As one small reminder of the problem, here is a chilling study by the Center for Environmental Health, which found these toxic chemicals in 38 out of 42 pieces of children’s furniture that were purchased and evaluated.

Carolyn Cox, co-author of the study, said:

Most parents would never suspect that their children could be exposed to toxic flame-retardant chemicals when they sit on a Mickey Mouse couch, but our report shows that children’s foam furniture can carry hidden health hazards.

Unfortunately, while the change in flammability standard is an important step toward reducing exposures to toxic flame retardants, most Americans do not replace their couches or furniture often, so the toxic legacy of California’s ill-advised flammability standard will remain in most people’s homes for years to come, especially in low-income communities where furniture is unlikely to be replaced until it is literally falling apart.

An additional concern is that when these chemicals are present in products that burn, the chemicals make the smoke more toxic, presenting risks to firefighters. Even when flame-retardant treated furniture is replaced, it will continue to spread toxic pollution after it is dumped in landfills, highlighting why we must reform our chemicals policies so that toxic substances are not added to consumer products in the first place.

no FR chemicals in furniture is great news, it's very encouraging, hopefully mattresses will be next, pray to god.

This is such good news! I have been using ancient furniture so I didn't have to fill my home with toxic flame retardant chemicals, and now maybe I can buy a sofa.

How will we know that a specific piece of furniture is free of these chemicals? Does the change in the law speak to labeling requirements?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.