Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

A Spooky Premise

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Jared Saylor:
Missouri Communities Pay a High Price for Lack of Toxic Coal Waste Regulation

Even though Patricia Schuba and I live nearly a thousand miles apart, we’ve been seeing a lot of each other lately. Patricia is the president of...

by Jared Saylor:

“Pure Michigan.” That’s the ad campaign Michigan is using to entice travelers to visit the Great Lakes state. Whether it’s fi...

by Jared Saylor:
The Insanity of Pennsylvania Coal Ash

One of the nation’s largest coal ash dumps spans two states (West Virginia and Pennsylvania) and borders a third (Ohio). It is 30 times larger t...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Lisa Evans's blog posts
30 October 2013, 5:26 PM
What if EPA’s coal ash rule doesn’t close unlined lagoons?
The pollutants from these black-bottomed coal ash lagoons are real—and deadly. (Image courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

The utility industry is speaking with one voice. According to comments filed last month with the Environmental Protection Agency, the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group (USWAG) is crying out for a coal ash rule that would allow forever-dumping of toxic waste in unlined, leaking and potentially unstable coal ash impoundments.

Each year, the coal industry saves boatloads of cash by dumping millions of tons of toxic waste in more than 1,000 lagoons, and they’d like to keep it that way. Wet dumping is the cheapest way, in the short-term, to dispose of toxic ash, but it is also the most dangerous. Terminating this dumping would require plants to close, stabilize and monitor coal ash lagoons that contain millions of tons of toxic waste and which have already poisoned underlying aquifers. To the coal industry, this is a frightening financial prospect.

Thanks to this week’s ruling by the D.C. District Court, an EPA coal ash rule is inevitable. The content of the agency’s rule, however, remains a mystery. The industry pick is the option called “D Prime,” which would allow unlined coal ash impoundments to operate indefinitely. In simple terms, the “D Prime” option primarily protects the pockets of the utility industry—not the health and safety of communities near coal ash lagoons.

Yet the EPA has no legal or rational justification whatsoever for allowing dangerous unlined impoundments to continue to be packed with toxic waste. The lessons of of recent lawsuits in North Carolina, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Montana and Nevada are abundantly clear—the pollutants from these black-bottomed lagoons are real and deadly, and they pose a clear and present danger to neighboring communities.

The only acceptable path forward is closure of lagoons and conversion to safer dry disposal of coal ash in engineered landfills. Anything short of this is a trick and a mockery out of this week’s precedential court decision.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.