What's at Stake
In 2013, Earthjustice successfully defended an EPA rule that reduces a major source of air pollution—ships that contain big diesel engines like tankers, freighters and cruise ships.
Ocean-going vessels with large marine diesel engines, such as container ships, tankers, freighters and cruise ships, are a significant source of air pollution in coastal states. Without the use of low-sulfur fuel, the emissions of these large ships will more than double in the next two decades.
Currently more than 30 major U.S. ports along the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific coasts are located in areas that don’t meet ozone and/or particulate standards. The Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach have calculated that ocean-going vessels produce 59 percent of the total diesel particulate matter emissions in the area, 36 percent of the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), and 90 percent of the emissions of sulfur oxides (SOx).
Earthjustice sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2007 to compel the agency to set meaningful emissions standards for this significant source of air pollution. After EPA issued a rule to control ship pollution through the use of low-sulfur fuel, the state of Alaska sued to overturn the requirement. If successful, Alaska’s challenge could invalidate the rule nationwide, exacerbating an already dangerous pollution problem.
Earthjustice defended the EPA rule from Alaska’s challenge to ensure that this important requirement can be applied nationally. In September 2013, Earthjustice won the case after the judge dismissed Alaska’s lawsuit, allowing EPA’s low sulfur fuel rule to stand.