Library Search

Article October 21, 2013

Costs of Coal Exports, Part IV: Jason Reed of Maryland

Jason Reed lives near the Port of Baltimore’s CSX coal export and processing facility.

Article October 14, 2013

Costs of Coal Exports, Part III: Margaret Fox of Maryland

(This is the third in a four-part series profiling communities that could be seriously impacted by increased toxic air and water pollution resulting from the federal government’s financing of the export of Appalachian coal to Asia.) This week, we meet Margaret Fox who lives near the CSX coal export and processing facility at the Port…

Article October 7, 2013

Costs of Coal Exports, Part II: Desiree Bullard of Maryland

(This is the second in a four-part series profiling communities that could be seriously impacted by increased toxic air and water pollution resulting from the federal government’s financing of the export of Appalachian coal to Asia.) This week we meet Desiree Bullard, who lives in Cumberland, Maryland, along rail lines that are experiencing increased traffic…

Article September 30, 2013

Costs of Coal Exports, Part I: Lorraine Ortega of Virginia

We’re making progress in ending America’s dependence on coal thanks to the work of Earthjustice and others to prevent the construction of new coal plants and hold existing coal plants to more stringent environmental standards. Now, hoping to shore up its bottom line, Big Coal is increasingly looking to ships millions of tons of U.S. coal…

Exports of coal from the U.S. to the Far East have increased.
(Aleksey Stemmer / Shutterstock)
Article August 13, 2013

As Coal Exports, Its Dark Legacy Stays Home

The use of coal in the U.S. has declined over the past few years, and orders for new plants are being cancelled at an increasing rate, owing to pressure from Earthjustice and others and competition from cheaper natural gas.

document July 31, 2013

Export-Import Bank Complaint

Press Release July 31, 2013

Lawsuit Challenges Federal Financing of Coal Exports from East Coast Ports

Suit charges taxpayer-backed U.S. Export-Import Bank with failure to assess environmental impacts of its dirty-fuel exports

The CSX coal export and processing facility in Baltimore, MD. Neighboring communities already suffer from air and noise pollution generated by the rail traffic and facility operations.
(Imagery (c) 2014 Google)
case July 30, 2013

Challenging Federal Financing of Coal Exports

While U.S. coal consumption has declined gradually over the past 10 years, U.S. coal exports have risen. The array of air, water, safety, health, biodiversity, and other impacts on local communities and ecosystems—which face a chain reaction of increased mining, rail traffic, and port activity—remains woefully unaddressed by state and federal regulators. In addition, the…