Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Sacrificial Waters

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Doug Pflugh:
A Year of Threats Looms for Western Rivers

We’re less than a month in, but 2014 is already shaping up to be a tough year for rivers. Across the nation, from West Virginia to California, t...

by Trip Van Noppen:
Govt. Loses Letters, So Let's Write Back for Clean Water

We are sorry to hear that the Department of Interior’s Office of Surface Mining lost 18,000 Earthjustice supporter letters. Our supporters wrote...

by Brian Smith:
Crisis In Court: Mega-farms Trying to Seize Salmon Water

This is the time of year when Chinook salmon head back up the Klamath/Trinity River system to spawn—if they have abundant, cold water. But this...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Tom Turner's blog posts
23 June 2009, 2:14 PM
High court clears way for mining company to destroy Alaskan lake

On June 22 the Supreme Court handed down a 6-3 decision that makes lakes and other waterways across the country vulnerable to being used as waste dumps for mining operations and other industrial processes. The case involved the Kensington mine, a gold mine north of Juneau, Alaska. The owner of the mine, Coeur Alaska, was awarded a permit by the Army Corps of Engineers that allows the company to deposit mine tailings into Lower Slate Lake as long as the mine operates, killing all aquatic life in the lake. The company promises to restore the lake to its former state, a process that would take several decades if it is possible at all.

Earthjustice sued to block the permit, arguing that it is in blatant violation of the Clean Water Act and that other methods are available for disposing of the tailings.

The Clean Water Act says all waters of the US should be fishable and swimmable, but here the mine makes no bones that dumping its waste into the lake will kill every single last fish in the lake.

The trial court said the permit was OK, the appeals court said it was illegal, and now the Supreme Court has sided with the mining company.

The situation arose because of a rule change put forward by the Bush administration, which allows mining concerns and others that produce waste that is a combination of liquids and solids ("slurry") to classify the waste as "fill," as in dirt that is used to create a levee or footing for a bridge.

Toxic-metal-containing slurry, like that produced by the Kensington mine, has always been regulated under a different rule that, for 30 years, has made the disposal of such waste in public waterways illegal, which is the clear intent of the Clean Water Act.

As Earthjustice president Trip Van Noppen said in a statement when the decision was announced, "The good news is that the problem is reversible. It was caused by a Bush administration rule reversing 30 years of successful regulation under the Clean Water Act. We call on President Obama to act immediately to repeal this rule and restore the original intent of the Clean Water Act." Congress can also act to reverse this decision, and a bill is now pending that would do just that. Today it may be a remote Alaskan lake, tomorrow it could be a lake near you.

In the meantime, the Obama administration should immediately rescind the dumping permit. This same mine has submitted alternative tailings dumping plans in the past showing alternatives are clearly available.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.