Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Tongass Roads

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Maggie Caldwell:
What Has Been Causing These Historic Droughts?

In a world where a forest the size of Germany is leveled and burned every year... where formerly fertile farmlands have been reduced to desert...where...

by Tom Waldo:
One Step Forward, One Back for America's Rainforest

For the Tongass National Forest, last week brought a long-overdue agency action that helped offset an unfortunate court decision. The Tongass stretch...

by Doug Pflugh:
Colorado Tackles Rules Governing Oil, Gas

Colorado has emerged as a western ground zero in the fracking boom, with more than 50,000 active wells in the state and 3,000 wells permitted annually...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Tom Turner's blog posts
16 June 2009, 10:54 AM
America's special rainforest remains in a state of regulatory limbo

The Ketchikan newspaper just published a long editorial titled "We Love Surprises," urging Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to surprise them and approve some new roads and timber sales in the Tongass National Forest despite the recent directive that suggests the administration is planning to take a year or two to study the situation and decide whether to make the 2001 Roadless Rule permanent.

The editorial makes it sound as if the only thing at stake is the very survival of Southeast Alaska. The piece also makes it sound as if the environmental movement is all powerful and dictating how the Obama administration acts in these matter.

If only that were so.

To recapitulate, the Tongass was excised from the Roadless Rule via a sneaky-Pete, behind-closed-doors conspiracy between the state of Alaska and the Bush Forest Service that environmental groups were not allowed to participate in.

Alaska sued, the feds said, "OK, you win," and the Tongass disappeared from the ambit of the rule.

As successful as the environmental groups have been in subsequent litigation, they have been unable to restore protection to the Tongass via the rule. Now, they (we) see a chance to persuade the administration to restore those vital protections. Appeals are being made to Mr. Vilsack and his boss. Please don't surprise us, sir. The Tongass is too important to be sacrificed to parochial economic interests.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.