Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Drawing an Arbitrary Line in the Coal Ash

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Lisa Evans:
Tr-Ash Talk: Not In Our Drinking Water

Utility giant FirstEnergy Corp unveiled plans last week to barge 3 million tons of coal ash annually nearly 100 miles on the Monongahela and Ohio rive...

by Jared Saylor:
Boxer Throws Punch At Coal Ash

Some members of the Senate believe it’s acceptable to write up legislation to prevent the EPA from regulating toxic coal ash—and then atta...

by Emily Enderle:
Tr-Ash Talk: Living With Lies and Coal Ash

It’s inspiring to see the commitment of Rep. David McKinley’s constituents living in the shadow of First Energy’s behemoth 1,000-acr...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Jared Saylor's blog posts
03 November 2009, 8:59 AM
When is hazardous coal ash not considered hazardous?
The devastation of the TVA spill in Tennessee, December 2008. Photo: United Mountain Defense

When is hazardous coal ash not considered hazardous? According to the Environmental Protection Agency, when you dump it in a landfill as opposed to a pond. This approach is currently being floated by the EPA in its plans to regulate coal ash later this year. Coal ash—the waste left over after coal is burned at coal-fired power plants—is full of dangerously high levels of arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium and other hazardous metals. Cancer rates skyrocket near coal ash dumps that have leaked into drinking water supplies.

As the one-year anniversary of the Kingston coal ash spill approaches (December 22), the EPA has been working hard to prepare the first ever federal regulations of coal ash. But newspapers are reporting that the Government Accountability Office issued a report last week that indicates EPA's plans aren’t the strongest safeguards against this toxic threat.

It seems that the EPA is considering calling coal ash hazardous when it’s stored in ponds, and not hazardous when it’s stored in landfills. So what’s the big deal? The focus is on the word, "hazardous." Under the law, waste regarded as hazardous is treated with much greater scrutiny and thus, better protections. Dumping coal ash in a pond usually means it’s wet; when it’s in a landfill, it’s dry. But the spill in Tennessee last year happened at a so-called "landfill," so the lines distinguishing the two are blurry, to say the least.

Our attorney and resident coal ash expert Lisa Evans said in the Tennesseean, "We would not think that would be a protective scheme, with the many cases where dry disposal has caused contamination of groundwater and surface water. Both (wet ash and dry ash) pose a threat to human health and the environment so it doesn't make sense to create that dichotomy."

Industry doesn’t want the hazardous designation at all, and we’re certain the residents living near coal ash landfills want their health protected just as much as people living near coal ash ponds. To create an unnecessary dichotomy just doesn't make sense. EPA plans to propose their rules governing coal ash disposal this December, and we’ll be keeping you updated on what the agency decides to do, and what you can do to help.

Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
omegle sohbet

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.