Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Administration Tries Again for Gulf Drilling Moratorium


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Kari Birdseye:

if (window!= top) // if your website window is not top top.location.href=location.href Earthjustice received some superb video today from Dut...

by Liz Judge:
Congress v. The Environment: The House Is On Fire

As I write this, members of the House of Representatives continue to debate and move their way through votes on hundreds of amendments to the chamber'...

by Marty Hayden:
America's Values, Environment on Chopping Block in Congress

House Republicans are using the oft-repeated refrain of “fiscal restraint” as their excuse for gutting several environmental initiatives t...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Tom Turner's blog posts
13 July 2010, 11:31 AM
Secretary Salazar issues new rule, hoping to persuade the judge
Sec. Ken Salazar

The Obama administration, having been thwarted in its attempts to declare a six-month moratorium on new deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico yesterday issued a new moratorium order, citing new information on the causes of the recent well blowout and other matters. According to a question-and-answer news release from the department:

"What are the differences between the May 28 deepwater drilling moratorium and the new deepwater drilling suspension?

"Like the deepwater drilling moratorium lifted by the District Court on June 22, the deepwater drilling suspensions ordered today apply to most deepwater drilling activities and could last through November 30. The suspensions ordered today, however, are the product of a new decision by the Secretary and new evidence regarding safety concerns, blowout containment shortcomings within the industry, and spill response capabilities that are strained by the BP oil spill.

"Moreover, the new decision by the Secretary establishes a process through which BOEM will gather and analyze new information from the public, experts, stakeholders, and the industry on safety and response issues, which could potentially provide the basis for identifying conditions for resuming certain deepwater drilling activities. In addition, the May 28 moratorium proscribed drilling based on specific water depths; the new decision does not suspend activities based on water depth, but on the basis of the drilling configurations and technologies."

The whole release, along with analysis and explanation by The Los Angeles Times, is here.

We fully expect industry to challenge this new moratorium before the same judge that blocked the previous attempt. Whether the new moratorium will persuade the judge remains to be seen. No matter what he does, his decision is almost certain to be appealed to the circuit court of appeals, which sustained the judge's previous blocking of the moratorium. Their argument is that there's no imminent threat of harm. But if there's no imminent threat of harm, why not go along with the moratorium? This story's far from over.

Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
lineturk

Nice post.Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very useful! I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post thanks.

I think its very commanding and very challenging situation for all the groups ..who had been keeping eye on the transaction of the widening of roads..they are adversely conjured hence people facing problems in it. sesli chat

There is no way to replace our need for oil in the short term - PERIOD. The long term effects of the oil spill will probably equal or slightly exceed the Katrina costs and effects It makes no sense to keep funding the Far East with oil purchases when most of the oil nation's goal is to wipe America off the map. I am not willing to continue sending our sons and daughters to die so the environmental groups can kick start their agendas sesli sohbet

The spill is a catastrophe - YES Stopping oil drilling and killing the industry associated with it would be an even bigger catastrophe. The oil industry hisotically has done a pretty good job drilling offshore. We don't stop airplanes and ships when one crashes or sinks, We don't stop farming when there is a catastrophic drought. We don't damn up all the rivers when ever there is a major flood. There is no way to replace our need for oil in the short term - PERIOD. The long term effects of the oil spill will probably equal or slightly exceed the Katrina costs and effects It makes no sense to keep funding the Far East with oil purchases when most of the oil nation's goal is to wipe America off the map. I am not willing to continue sending our sons and daughters to die so the environmental groups can kick start their agendas. We have oil we need to get it now while the alternative energy forms are developed. BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.