Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Victory for Americans and Their Lungs Over Toxic Air Pollution

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Suma Peesapati:
Clearing the Air in the Southwest with State, Federal Rules

Arizona Public Service Company officially announced yesterday that it will retire Units 1, 2, and 3 of the Four Corners Power Plant by January 1, 2014...

by Sarah Saylor:
EPA - Here Are 55 Reasons To Listen Closely

At the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's listening session regarding carbon pollution controls from existing power plants, I put myself in EPA&rs...

by Adrian Martinez:
California Regulators Can't Overlook This Pollution Study

A paper published last night in the Journal of Transportation Research Part D: Transport and the Environment identifies how many people are impacted b...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Sam Edmondson's blog posts
09 June 2010, 10:43 AM
EPA abandons a rule permitting unregulated burning of hazardous waste
The star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet.

Juliet once said to Romeo: "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Were Juliet as concerned by toxic air pollution as love, the fair Capulet might have instead philosophized: "That which we call hazardous waste by any other name would pollute as much when burned."

I have a good reason for butchering Shakespeare's poetry. Yesterday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finally abandoned a dangerous exemption that allowed industrial polluters to store, transport, and burn hazardous waste without meeting crucial requirements to protect public health and the environment.

How could they do this, you ask? It's all in a name. Chemical manufacturers and other industry groups asked the Bush administration for permission to call more than 100,000 tons of hazardous waste by a different name: "fuel." Calling hazardous waste "fuel" would allow many facilities to burn these wastes while escaping tough pollution control requirements that Congress enacted to protect people from toxic pollution. But as Earthjustice attorney Jim Pew said, "Calling hazardous waste a 'fuel' doesn't make it any less polluting when burned in incinerators and boilers across the country."

In January 2009, the Bush administration—doing what it did best—granted this last-minute favor to industry. Soon after, Earthjustice filed suit on behalf of Sierra Club and the Louisiana Environmental Action Network to protect people from this dangerous regulatory sleight-of-hand. While the case was pending, the EPA under new leadership announced plans to scrap the misguided exemption altogether. Yesterday, they followed through on those plans.

"This is a great victory for Americans and their lungs," said Pew. "EPA Administrator Jackson's withdrawal of this rule demonstrates a commitment to protecting public health that should have Americans breathing a little easier." I imagine that Juliet would agree.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.