Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Wolf Killing Is Back On State Agendas


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by John McManus:
September Wolf Hunt Hangs On Earthjustice Lawsuit

The state of Montana is planning to greatly increase the number of wolves hunters will be allowed to kill this fall. That is unless a federal judge ru...

by Brian Smith:
In Court To Argue For Protecting Northern Gray Wolves

Federal District Court Judge Donald Molloy heard arguments yesterday on whether the federal government's decision to delist wolves in the northern Roc...

by John McManus:
One-Year Anniversary Of California's Lone Wolf

Last Friday, California’s only documented wild wolf, a young male known as OR7, officially hit the one-year mark since his arrival in the Golden...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View John McManus's blog posts
20 October 2010, 11:34 AM
Congressmen try legislative end runs around court ban on hunting

Since Earthjustice attorneys won a court decision in August ordering the federal government to once again extend Endangered Species Act protections to wolves in the northern Rockies, state governments have been busy trying to come up with ways to kill wolves anyway.

The court ruling meant that Idaho and Montana had to call off plans for wolf hunts this year. Montana tried changing the names of its hunt to "conservation hunt" in a bid to get federal blessing to kill endangered wolves. Idaho submitted its own wolf-killing proposal, which would remove all but a handful of wolves from Idaho's upper Clearwater basin.

While the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rejected Montana's unlawful ploy, it is still pondering Idaho's plan. In another ominous development, Idaho recently announced it won't lift a finger to monitor or enforce existing protections for wolves, including anti-poaching laws. At the same time, a handful of Congressmen have announced plans to introduce legislation that would categorically eliminate federal protections for wolves—a species whose near-extinction in the lower-48 states provided one of Congress's motivations for adopting the Endangered Species Act in 1973.

These Congressional efforts threaten to undermine Act's integrity as one of our nation's strongest tools to protect species and ecosystems from human-caused destruction. It's not clear when Congress will take up these measures nor how far they're likely to go.

If Congress exempts wolves from the Esa, or if Idaho, Montana and Wyoming successfully pressure the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to once again strip wolves of protections, wolves will be "managed" by state governments that want to kill them.
 

Kevin: Actually, the Occidentalis is the native subspecies of Wolf. The Wolves that were taken from Canada for the reintroduction were from Southwest Canada, which attachs to Northwest United States, which means it has the same bushes, trees, vegetation to bring about the same ecosystems, and with the same ecosystems, you get the same herbivores, and with the same herbivores, you get the same PREDATORS. Wolves in the two regions migrated back and forth, due to similar ecosystems and food sources, for territorial, mating and food purposes. They did not stop at the two countries boarder lines and tell themselves "Hey, we cannot cross into another country." They had free willing migration between the two countries to come and go as they pleased. Therefore; the Wolves that were previously inhabiting the United States are were the same ones from Southwest Canada at that time, and the Wolves in Southwest Canada region were never wiped out and 31 were taken for reintroduction to the United States, that means they are the SAME SUBSPECIES. But, keep on using fabrications to fulfill your views.

The problem is that the media relies on the Fish and Game's point of view, and the Fish and Game's agenda is to work with any side that will come up with the money to contribute to their organization. I work in research of carnivores such as Wolves. From what I have learned, the Fish and Game will obey by the rules of satisfying anyone that will dish out the money. Last year, they posted a number of negative portrayals on Wolves so that they can satisfy hunters to put more money into the Wolf hunts because they were legal. This year, a week before the ruling, the Fish and Game put out an article stating that Wolves are not the reason as to why a small amunt of areas are losing Elk populations, it is human harvest. Out of the 29 zones researched, 11 of them were overpredated by human hunters in which 4 of those zones lost Elk populations. 6 of those zones were predated upon by Wolves, and 4 by Wolves and Cougars, with the others having no results. In the 4 zones that lost Elk populations, all were due to human harvest and not Wolves and/or Cougars. This was clearly to attract more tourism for the states Wolves. With more tourism, it means money in the back pocket of the Fish and Game. I read a statement from a journalist from Idaho who commented on one of the links to Earthjustice regarding the misrepresentation the Fish and Game has done in regards to Wolves and mentioning that MOST of Idaho citizens do not share the views that hunters and ranchers do. In a research project I did last December on two packs of Wolves in Idaho, we surveyed more then 35 non hunters and ranchers in the area, and ALL stated that hunters are misinforming people on the issue regarding Wolves.

Hunting down and removing this non native wolf from Oregon is the top agenda for me. CL Occidentalis has never been present below the Canadian border throughout history. Removing ESA protections from this illegally "Introduced" specie is going to happen. We urge every rural Oregonian to document the disaster this specie is having on our eco system, and submit the documentation to savewesternwildlife.org.
Together we will overcome the plague of the wolfaboo's.

Save a herd of elk this year, Kill 1 'Canadian" wolf !!!

Wouldn't they not have the votes yet, as democrats currently have a super majority until january? or are Democrats doing this? I wouldn't think so.

I was a free-lance journalist working on public radio stories during the wolf reintroduction period. I am very familiar and knowledgeable about the issue and I also live in Idaho, one of the states trying to have another public hunt. I believe that Idaho Fish & Game misrepresents the majority of people who live in Idaho who DO NOT want a wolf hunt, past or present. Its survey was skewed to represent hunters, as that is where all of its budget comes from -- not from taxpaying citizens like myself who do not hunt or fish, and want to see wolves be part of the ecosystem.

Wolves are a keystone species. Check out the new award-winning film: Lords of Nature by Green Fire Productions.

In addition to Congress trying to change wolf protections and the ESA, Idaho's Governor Otter (up for reelection) has washed his hands over working with USFW on a wolf plan in our state. During the reintroduction period, when the state of Idaho wanted no part, the Nez Perce Indian Tribe stepped up to the plate and were awarded the contract by USFW for Idaho wolf management. The tribe is why the wolf populations are as high as they are. They did an excellent job!

So where does the Tribe stand today? I do not know, but I would hope the feds and Earthjustice would ask them to get involved again.

give us the names of those voting this way and we can tell them how we'll try to vote them out of office.

I can't wait to buy a tag and shoot the first wolf I see. Get em in the crosshairs and BANG!!! Bwaaaahahahahahahaaaaa!

Addressed to all you macho wolf killers and pathetic ranchers: Native Americans revere the Wolf. Why can you not revere the Wolf? Got sheep? Got cows? You probably have fences. Time you started listening to what the elders of the Native American people have to say about the wolves. Wilderness is the salvation of my soul. Wolves are the guardians of the Wilderness. Teddy Roosevelt met John Muir and was impressed with his philosophy of saving the Wilderness. Roosevelt set aside Wilderness areas to be preserved for future generations. If this had not been done I would have never seen a wolf. I really dont give a damn about your problems. if you live in the Wilderness and dont like Wolves...get out. It is as simple as that. If you can not live with wolves maybe you should move to a town where it is safe. They dont need you in the woods messing up the pristine Wilderness. I dont want to see you there either. I dont want any fences or poison put out to kill the wolves. So dont be a coward. You can not kill a wolf with your bare hands. You have to use a rifle from a distance. Is that an act of bravery? I would not call it survival of the fittest. So if you are such a macho tough guy then walk among the wolves without fear without a weapon. That is why the Native people revere the Wolf. Your enemy is fear not wolves. Be strong. Fear not. Go straight forward. But for most it really is about greed. My daddy killed snakes for this land. You have replaced wildlife with livestock. So wolves eat the livestock. The Wolves are Native. You are not Native. The Wolves stay. You go. Bye Bye

[a reply after jack enright :]
Excellent and punchy; just I would have written it. The trash use Xylitol etc and are often, or usually?, Federal grazing freeloaders or entitled lazy gun or bow users.
All efforts are good insofar as they forestall extinctions. Still the wolf is more a local biodiversity cause and symbol to me than it is a whole species. Surely Canis familiaris can interbreed with wolves so they would be one species of varying thyroxin level.
But I support Living with Wolves; also TNC, WWF, CI, WCS, ikat.org, humanela.org, heifer.org, Jim Hightower's Lowdown etc. Yes! they find me. Biodiversity is all; we are one species just smart enough to ruin all known life in this universe, and in cruel fashion.
Tiger is almost gone and iconic too; so let's SAVE THEM ALL.

I couldnt agree more !! Leave the poor animals alone They have a right to live on this planet just like all creatures. There is no reason to MURDER them. We did this to the Indians as well, KiIl em all just cause we dont like them, forever we will suffer for what we did to the true Americans.This is the 21st century The same thing holds true to wolves you idiots have no right to kill them

There is no reason for killing them it is just MURDER!!! knock it off and wake up, leave them alone and let the poor animals live. Seems like we did this to the Indians as well kill em all just cause we dont like them.Forever we will suffer because what we did to the true North Americans this is the 21st century leave em alone dont keep making the same WRONG MISTAKE again ,and againlet the animals live ..BECAUSEV THEY HAVE THE RIGHT

anonymous coward - learn how to spell before you insult people. it just makes you look even more ignorant than your comments do - if that's even possible.

Bears, coyotes, mountain lions, wild dogs, kill more livestock. Wolves are the last on the chain to kill only for food. This is nature and there is a natural balance. Man made solutions will never
bring an answer. Let nature take it's course. The way God mean't it to be from the smallest of the food chain to the largest. STOP THE KILLINGS! WOLVES HAVE A RIGHT TO LIVE JUST LIKE ANY OTHER CREATURE ON THIS EARTH. No need for arguements or name calling just do what is right, what you know in your heart is right. Life's cycle being born, living and a time to die.

Quoting you: Bears, coyotes, mountain lions, wild dogs, kill more livestock

I challenge you to back that up with some facts. I guarantee that you can't. You obviously don't have a clue so do yourself a favor and shut your ignorant mouth.

Here is a link to a graph by the USDA which shows stats for cattle deaths in 2006.

http://howlingforjustice.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/carnivores-that-kil...

Even if all of the "unknown" cattle deaths were actually wolves, coyote still would have accounted for about 27% more dead cattle than wolves. In case the link doesn't work-- Coyotes 51%, domestic dogs 12%, Felids 8%, Vultures 5%, Wolves 2%, Bears 1%, Other/Unknown 21%.

So coyotes are doing a lot more damage than wolves. Also, there are non-lethal ways to keep wolves from eating livestock. For example, there is a REASON humans bred several types of wolfhounds and/or sheepdogs. We keep a Great Pyrenees out with our goats to protect them from domestic or feral DOGS. We have lost goats to dogs in the past, but none since we got Queenie to guard them.

I totally agree. Defenders of Wildlife even reimburse ranchers that lose livestock to wolves so what's the problem.

We need carnivores to maintain the natural balance of nature!

that's another problem..."the government reimburses?????" Oh REALLY NOW?????...where do they get that money? TAXPAYERS!
WE are paying for those, I pay taxes, and am a vegetarian. I pay to help meat farmers! This is NOT cool. Government should not bail out anyone. If you fail, you fail and you go back to work for McDonald's like it was meant to be.
Making a dumb hick rich because they kill meat is wrong.
Making them richer because they were too stupid to protect their cattle is worse.
If they lose them, it's their fault for not protecting them, by keeping them in safer quarters like electric fencing and better barriers to property lines. Stop paying them for their own laziness and stupidity! This money is OURS US government...we the taxpayers should not fund some jerk's losses.

I say otherwise and I'm not a liar. No point in explaining how, I'd only get obscenities from you.

I think one of the reasons you illiterate morons want wolves obliterated is because you want the elk for yourselves. Your so blinded by blood lust and greed you can't see anything else. Why not use your brains for once, instead of your testicles, and put yourselves in the animals position? Think how it would feel to be hunted and shot and to have your family destroyed. Think is the key word here. I hope I haven't used too many big words for you guys.

RE: "go back to your stinking city and mind your own business"
This is a free country stupid!
Just because you live in an area does not make it yours, in fact that is a gang type attitude that
is against the law.
You can't claim anyplace as your own, it is not and never was yours, it belongs to the people, ALL OF THEM!
A person is free to go anyplace they want, and if YOU don't like it, get out of OUR country!
You un-American facist nazi terrorist!

RE: "It's part of our way of life."
NO IT ISN'T
THERE ARE GROCERY STORES IN IDAHO
YOU DO NOT NEED TO KILL ELK OR ANYTHING ELSE TO SURVIVE
Hunting is barbaric and unnecessary on all levels!!!!
Hunting is a recreational pastime, NOT a vital need for your well being!
ABSOLUTELY NO LEGISLATION SHOULD EVER BE PUT INTO PLACE TO ALLOW YOU MORE RIGHTS THAN YOU ALREADY HAVE TO HUNT OR KILL, AND FRANKLY THE ONES YOU HAVE SHOULD BE ABOLISHED!!!
EVOLVE FOR GOODNESS" SAKE ALREADY OR GET OUT OF THE GENEPOOL!!!!

What about a "keystone" species do you not understand? Those who want to delist wolves obviously are not educated in management. I see the term "idiot" is used frequently and appears to be appropo at this juncture. Anyone , myself included, who has a basic education in ecosystems would understand that this species is necessary for the health of the entire system. If you are a special interest group, ie wealthy rancher, have the balls to say that is your agenda. You don't like wolves for some reason, usually because your information is inaccurate or incomplete. Take the effort to know what you are talking about before you take what belongs to all American citizens. Wolves are very much loved in this country and your desire to wipe out what offends you is typically egocentric.

As for educating us "idiots" ..
What level education do you have? (and don't lie)
Here, let me go first:
I personally have college level training in environmental and engineering areas as well as computer related design
I am pretty sure you probably can't spell the names of some of the classes I have passed with never below a "B+" average.
I speak for most when I say that it is you whom are in dire need of educating, to quote you... "if that is possible".

Calling people names and simply quoting proposals from local wildlife "management" plans just proves that you were not capable of typing anything legible and worthwhile yourself.
Wolves, just as with any other species of wildlife, are only a problem to those who let them be.
Securing perimeters of properties and keeping watch over whatever the species in question could potentially damage is key. If you cannot do that, you do not deserve whatever it was you were supposed to protect in the first place, period. If a wolf is on someone's property damaging livestock or something to that nature that they can be relocated, but opening hunting season on an already endangered species is NOT, and never will be the right answer. The truth, without anyone having to ask twice, is that anyone who supports this means to an end is too lazy to manage that wildlife group properly.
This legislation proposal is saying "Let's just open a hunting season on them and let the people(whom already pay our salaries with tax money) kill them."
Because the government themselves are too busy stealing taxpayers money to actually work, which is what the citizens believe they are paying for with taxes. Poor schmucks have no clue, unfortunately.
Just one more way big government steals from the little guy. This is what we taxpayers pay government to do.
If you were capable of managing the wildlife or anything else in your area, this issue would not be present. Period. People across the country would not be reading about it if you had a handle on it at all. Since we are reading about it, and since it has made headlines, it is now common knowledge that you in fact CANNOT manage your wildlife, nor your local governments which are paid exorbitant salaries to oversee said wildlife. Again I must reiterate the answer is RELOCATE when necessary, NOT kill endangered species, for any reason, even if you the individual deems it necessary to do so. The land you own may be yours, but those animals are property of each and every citizen of the US! Kill them and I guarantee, there will be droves of activists doing much more damage to your properties than those wolves could ever do! Wolves don't have access to things like guns and explosives and tire spikes and incendiary devices, humans do! Activists already use similar items to defend trees, do you think they wouldn't use them to defend living animals you are trying to force into extinction? My point: If in fact you want to solve your problem with violence, then perhaps the ones who take up for the wolves should and very well may begin to use violence to defend them!
This is not a threat, but a warning shot if you will. Back off and do the right thing.
Save this species and respect its right to be here. Wolves were here before we were, it's their land, we should show respect for them, not kill them.

If you lived next door to me, I may find your screaming bratty children were equally as annoying as wolves, they damage property, make noise, and spread disease, just as wild animals do, but it is NOT my right to kill them for it.

If you feel an animal's life is yours to take, for any reason other than feeding your family you are wrong. (and in case you were thinking it...don't try that humans are above animals crap with me, humans are primates and therefore are animals too) Buffalo were wiped out nearly to extinction by the same means. Some uneducated jackass decided it was their right to kill them when it was not, any more than it is that buffalo's right to kill humans. We would put it to death for taking one of our lives, so legislation should equally protect animals, including wolves.

WE ARE MINDING OUR OWN BUSINESS!!!
Wolves and all wildlife species in the country belong to ALL... NOT JUST YOU!
If you eradicate them to extinction, we are not going to be able to enjoy them. Not to mention they are a vital part of the ecosystem and help you too, even though you are too uninformed to know this.
With no wolves, animals such as rabbits and deer and other herbivores run rampant, damaging crops as well as the very grass your cattle feed upon.
This would hurt you financially, doubling, or in some cases even tripling your feed and operation cost per year, forcing you into bankruptcy, which statistics show most farmers are facing anyway due to climate changes, rising operation costs, and legislation sprouting up from organic farmers over cross-pollination. You see, I DO know everything I need to know about your situations. I DID do my homework before speaking out. You should do some too. Perhaps that would change your views.

By claiming that a wolf population can grow to "unsustainable" levels, you clearly indicate your ignorance of basic population dynamics. Apex predators, such as wolves, are typically regulated by prey availability. Once a predator's population reaches levels where its prey base can no longer support it, density-dependent mortality due largely to starvation causes a subsequent reduction in the predator's population. It is a basic pattern in ecology that apex predators cannot grow to "unsustainable" levels, by definition, because the consequent starvation this causes rapidly returns their populations back to levels that can be supported (i.e., sustained) by their prey base. The reduction in the predator's population from starvation also allows their prey to recover, causing out-of-phase cycling of predator and prey populations

Wolves were capable of sustaining their own populations for thousands of years before humans arrived on this continent. It is only our arrogance and desire to control and "manage" wild populations that allows us to believe otherwise. Of course, we also want to maximize the amount of prey available to our own hunters. So human management of a predator population is in effect no different than a form of interference competition between predators for a common resource.

Learn some basic science before you try to lecture trained ecologists on "wildlife management."

Totally agree!

AMEN!

I find it hilarious that someone calling someone else ignorant cannot spell "instincts" something most of us learned to spell in second grade. You have given away your position sir, you have lost the strategic battle.

the purpose of idaho's desire to kill wolves has nothing to do with maintaing long term viability of the wolf population. it has to do with maintaining the power of the livestock and hunting lobby. your governor, butch otter, offering to be the first to go out and kill the first wolf is the prime example of gun-happy, ignorant people like you, who do not understand the role wolves play in maintaining a balanced ecosystem. the "scientists" who come up with the "devastating" impacts of wolf "predation" need to go back to school and get an education. i lived in idaho for two years and i can attest to the fact the the educational system there is sorely in need of improvement, so i'm not surprised that people like you make the arguments you do. in addition, wolf population will not grow to unsustainable levels. nature regulates animal populations. when there isn't enough to eat, the wolf population will naturally level off, and it is not YOU or those of your ilk who should be deciding what the proper level is. given the kind of politicians you people elect out there, it is a wonder you can manage the state at all, let alone try to figure out how nature works and manage that, too. you people are a bunch of cretins.

Agreed wholeheartedly. It is no coincidence that rural states such as Idaho and Indiana have smiley faces with varying levels of sad or happy smiles to indicate time remaining before road construction ends. It is because of the higher population of illiterate citizens there. Cretins, mutants, just plain stupid. Only a stupid person would want to kill something that was not immediately threatening them personally at the moment.

I am from Idaho and I know who the idiots are. It's the numbsculls who pretend to "manage" wildlife and the state lands. They use helicopters to land near wolves so they can shoot them. They eradicated a pack that lived in the Sawtooth area. They have an archaic view of nature in which "man" dominates and is free to "exploit" the land through such useful activities as grazing cattle and sheep in marginal areas thereby ruining riparian and other habitat, they also value mining, including gold mining upriver from Boise in their sole water supply, need I go on? They have placed plutonium in the basalt rock upriver on the Snake...they have allowed giant feedlots to pollute the very scarce water supply in and near the Magic Valley. In short, these folks are not capable of managing the environment, period. Such a beautiful state and such sorry stewardship.

It has long been my belief that humans are the aliens we write about in science fiction. Not in the literal sense, but figuratively, in that we use all resources unto extinction, then look for another source of habitat. We simply strip mine every available ecosystem, then move on. If this weren't true we would not put so much research into colonization of places like the moon and Mars.

I would like the names of all these Congressmen and Senators as well as those in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service who are proposing eliminating the protection of wolves and who are willing to turn a blind eye to poachers or others who would kill these wonderful animals and their pups. What has happened to the "humanity and compassion" in these people???? This all started with Sarah Palin in Alaska!!! I would be willing to write to each and every one of them to express my displeasure with them and would hope that everyone else would do the same. What do these people/ groups have against these animals?????
Thank you for your help and info.

Unfortunately this did not start with stupid Sarah Palin. Americans have been gaining financially from the killing of innocent creatures for a very long time. The US government paid poachers $100. a head to kill buffalo to starve the natives before and during the gold rush, until their numbers dwindled to less than a hundred head to the entire western region of the US.
It is however, time we Americans put a stop to it all. Stand up for every creature before they are all gone. No blind eye, and if a congressman turns a blind eye, get him out of office at all cost! Fight your battles not here on the web with many words, but on the ballots with just a choice short few words. You will have more impact in the long run.
What happened to their humanity is: They became politicians.
So even better than the voting process....
Abolish government. Put the power back in the hands of the people where it belongs.

Stop Killing the Wolves!
They are a vital component to a healthy ecosystem.
Without them the ecosystem is unhealthy, diseased deer, elk, and other creatures, compromise the ecosystem and rabies cases increase. It is a no win situation for a compromised ecosystem.
There are organizations and private and public citizens in this country that donate millions of dollars annually to protect wildlife, because they know the value of a balanced ecosystem.
They know that wolves are the top of the predator food chain, that are the stewards of a healthy ecosystem that weed out the sick animals.
If the wolves are all gone then the diseased animals are allowed to live and spread diseases.
Then it is only a matter of time before humans start to become infected with the animal diseases.
You people need to go back to school, I guess, so that you can relearn Ecology 101, and Biology 101!

Wow,

As a decorated science teacher at a National Blue Ribbon and California Distinguished Public School and as as advocate for a return to balance in OUR American and World environments, I am saddened by the ignorance of those individuals that do not understand what a healthy ecosystem is, what it should even look like, and why it is effective and a benefit for ALL including humans, ; not a golf course.

I happen to friendly with a scientist that is in a good position to understand the role of the wolf in an ecosystem, Chief Biologist of the Wolf Reintroduction Doug Smith at Yellowstone National Park. I am personally trying to move for return of the gray wolf back in low population density areas in northern California, and also OUR State Seal, the grizzly bear.

Many of these "against" folks are using OUR public lands for their selfish reasons; free-range grazing which destroys riparian habitats and threatens native fish populations and many other species up and down the food webs while also polluting OUR freshwater with parasites and bacteria from animal waste.

There is a way to coexist in balance with nature; if WE choose to put OUR efforts forth in a constructive and positive way. There is an old Boy Scout and spelunking motto, "Take nothing but pictures and leave nothing but footprints".

With over 307+ million in the US and over 7+billion world-wide, WE had better grow up and cease the rapid consumptive and degradation of our planet and realize that OUR environment is what keeps US ALL healthy. That goes for ocean and land!

Mike I Luv ya!
You tell it like it is.
U.S. - you got my Canadian wolves because we believed you when you said that you learned how vital the wolves are needed for balance, after you killed the wolves that you had. It is shocking how fast you were back to your guns and kill 'em mentality. You haven't learned anything. Your ignorance is profound. Your superior attitude is baffling. Your lack of respect and gratitude for wildlife is shameful.
Please, send my wolves (in hope you haven't killed them all) and all descendants back to Canada ALIVE.
I would rather meet a family of wolves, then you people.
That is what they are - a family. Not a 'wild pack of killers'.
If I could stand in front of every wolf that has a gun pointed at them, I would.
If I could block every den to prevent people from gassing the puppies, I would.
Earthjustice and all organizations that fight for the safety and preservation of the wolves, I am proud to be a part of.

Agreed. I have owned hybrids whom were nearly full blooded. They are sweet and affectionate and extremely intelligent and social creatures. Studies have shown that dogs...just domestic dogs are as smart as an average 5 year old child. Wolves are substantially smarter than dogs, therefore we must deduce that wolves are smarter than five year old children by a long shot.( keep in mind that not all are alike, and some children at age five can solve calculus equations and perform difficult piano concertos, so some wolves are even smarter than those statistics show) More like ten to 15 year olds. Wolves develop (not like dogs but) slower like humans do, they learn faster, and they are not killers. My wolves played with rabbits, rats, hedgehogs, and my cats! They ONLY kill in the wild for food or to defend their young. Never has there been a case where it has been proven otherwise, and there never will be.

Why don't these people see that if you eradicate a species, all others suffer?

I believe people turn away from these issues. There just is not enough people in this world that care about these type of issues. As long as us humans have food in our stomachs, happy and safe then nothing else matters.

Of course they aren't talking about it. They want to win the legislation dumbass.
If you want to sell a car you don't start by telling the potential buyer everything that is wrong with it, you instead tell them how good it is.
The same goes for anyone proposing a change in legislation. We "liberals" aren't retarded.
Politics is all about pulling wool over someone's eyes just long enough to get a vote, then doing the exact opposite that you said you would once the coast is clear. Oh and FYI: Calling us asshats is not showing us that you possess any semblance of intelligence.
Being liberal has nothing to do with this issue. It is not a liberal view, it is an intelligent and non violent one. The only real answers ARE non-violent ones. Until you hate mongers who would rather see something dead than give it a little bit of freedom from your tyranny wake up, our entire planet is in danger. Frankly, killing parts of a vital ecosystem should be considered high treason against man, country, and planet, punishable to the fullest extent of international law, for which one should not be allowed pardon, amnesty, nor immunity of any kind. If I (and the several million other supporters of the wildlife population on this lovely but very ill thanks to people like you planet were to band together and) show up on your doorstep to manually defend these poor animals, you might be less likely to try killing them.

Russell, part of the reason is the way you communicate. Your type can only use foul language and stomp around in rage instead of having a calm and meaningful discussion. I have not seen the "only keeping them at a manageable level" in evidence. I hear of killing wolves at random on personal property, killing them from planes and helicopters, poisoning them, killing pups, and so on. These are not the behaviors of people interested in conservation and adhering to endangered species laws. I once saw a sign in a small town in Montana that said, "Love Montana? Shoot a wolf and take it with you." Real redneck kinda thinking.

This reminds me of something else...sharks.
Following the inception of the first "Jaws" movie, a veritable witch hunt to eradicate sharks ensued that would last for several decades. In reality, shark attacks are rare, nearly all of them are easily explained, and around 95% of those are not fatal.
I used to live in Jacksonville, Florida and loved to pick up sharks teeth on the beach. One day as an adult I decided to share this experience with my children, thinking how wonderful it would be to watch them do what I had as a child, passing that memory for them to eventually share with their children, and so forth. I was sickened to find that the beach where I would fill my pockets with teeth in an hour walking with my mother, yielded not one tooth!
My heart sank, for I knew the reason was that the sharks were all dead.
I have owned them as pets and when well fed they are pettable, they let you pick them up in your hands, and will roll over to have their bellies scratched just like a dog.
They too are labeled by misinformation as brutal bloodthirsty killers.
Just like wolves, their number dwindle due to overfishing, and outright poaching.
In the Florida Keys, on a small island known as "No Name Key" all animals are tame, making this location a veritable Utopian atmosphere, which is a treat and a privilege to witness.
Raccoons climbed in our car, deer poked their heads into the car window, all looking for a handout of food or to be petted. On this island there is a small pond known as "The Blue Hole" and there is a plaque dedicated to an alligator that is no longer a part of it's population. Here is his story:
A young girl came up missing in the area. Local officials decided to take the gator that was big enough to kill a human and dissect him. This was a long time tame resident of he pond by the name of "Big Joe" Upon opening him up they discovered nothing out of the ordinary for a gator to eat. Big Joe had given his life for no reason. But that is not the end of the story. Very closely following that event, they found the girl's body nearby in the woods. She had been murdered by a human. It wasn't even an animal that killed her, ans not one animal took part in her death. To beat all, even though she had lain, bloody, near that pond, on that island full of wildlife of all kinds, she was intact other than her fatal injuries. The animals didn't even feed off of her once she was dead. This is not just evidence that one animal can be trustworthy with humans in every way, but that an entire island full of them would not even hurt her body once she was dead.

Wolves and other large predators are an integral component of native North American ecosystems. Their systematic extirpation from the United States has created unforeseen consequences throughout the continent's diverse ecosystems. For instance, the eradication of wolves from the lower 48 created an open predator niche that coyotes rapidly filled, and now coyotes are considered a major "nuisance" animal by many humans where they once were relatively uncommon when wolves were present. Wolves also have been shown to alter the behavior of their prey in a manner such that, in their absence, deer, elk, and other ungulates are more likely to graze down streambeds and transmit dangerous diseases such as Lyme Disease. If you believe that wolf eradication constitutes "sound wildlife management policy", you fail to grasp the complexity and non-linearities in ecosystem dynamics and should be prepared to reap some rather unpleasant ecological consequences from disrupting the role of an apex predator.

People have very emotional feelings on both sides of the wolf issue, whether it affects them personally or not. I prefer to study the facts of the situation, which then enable me to develop a more reasoned opinion. Once you have done some reading on the issue, you will discover: a) Wolves are in fact an integral part of the ecosystem that have existed for many thousands of years, keeping these herds checked in a healthy balance for the environment by preventing overgrazing, which is best on so many levels I cannot even address it here; b) The herds have been inflated to an artificially high level to suit the hunting industry, so they are hardly in danger of being eradicated, and in fact their overpopulation hurts, rather than helps, the environment; c) Where mankind has encroached upon nature and lays claim to the land, there will always be conflicts with other major predators like the wolf, and yes, some wolves will kill and eat convenient prey, though taken in the big scheme of things, those numbers are comparatively small. Having wildlife corridors run through man-held areas are an excellent idea. Protecting livestock and culling certain wolves for continually killing livestock is understandable. But eradicating the entire species due to the behavior of a very few is like eradicating the entire species of bears for the same thing. Until mankind learns to share, respect and live with nature, we will always have these problems. The wolf is a beautiful, wonderful and critical part of nature, not a pest. It is time we began understanding them and working with them.

"Perhaps ~ Whoever coined the phrase 'Big, bad wolf' should be shot." Not really, of course. But ...Sigh. These beautiful animals are being hunted down .... and for what reason? Let them live! Please!

Unfortunately, people are driving other animals out of their habitats and into danger and death. I wonder if the people who, in all good will, wanted to reintroduce the wolves did them a favor. They might have known from the history of hatred of wolves and their brutal deaths in the past that things would probably not change with their new presence.

You are not Native the wolves are Native. Wolves will insure a healthier herd of deer, moose and elk. Your roads and civilization will not insure a healthy habitat for wildlife. So if you do live in an area where herds of elk, moose and deer thrive you should expect to see wolves and appreciate their presence. They are Native animals you are not. In the past centuries non Native people went on a rampage killing any thing in their path which would be Native people, wolves, bears and bison. If you continue on the warpath you will cross swords with the avengers. Yes the Avengers, ever heard of the Mongols? They were Nature's way of disposing of unwanted elements. They effectively destroyed the Roman empire and their rapacious and licentious path of destruction. Now it has come full circle. You are on the receiving end rather than the wolves. Wolves are the Creators desire. Who are you to deny the Creator? You will reap the whirlwind.GO WILD! Camping is the way to go. Dancing with the Wolves.

Yup, get out from behind your safe and fat desk and walk your kindergartner to the bus stop each morning with a loaded side arm. Come out here and live our dream. Why put the escalated numbers of these canibals on us?? These predators were not even native to our area when introduced and have taken out the ones that were. Any living Idaho timberwolf now is in captivity for it's own protection . . . Will they thrive is anyone's guess. Have any of the liberal do gooders thought about their extinction?? Idaho has managed it's wildlife very well, so back the hell off and let us take care of the problem for you!! You shoved this down our throats and put this issue in our back yard, let us clean it up for you. What?? No wolves in DC?? Why is that our problem??

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options