Earthjustice advocacy, litigation reveal dispersants’ dirty chemical secrets
<Updated in final paragraph>
Pop quiz: nearly 2 million gallons of chemicals are about to be dumped into the ocean where they will mix with oil gushing from a blown out well. Do you:
A. Study beforehand the chemicals’ effects on marine life?
B. Study beforehand the chemicals’ effects on humans?
C. Study beforehand what will happen when the chemicals mix with the oil?
D. Just dump the chemicals in mass quantities without sufficient knowledge of their toxicity or of how they will affect marine life and humans?
Well, following last year’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, answer D is exactly what happened.
With millions of gallons of oil spurting from the blown-out well, chemical oil dispersants were applied in unprecedented amounts both at the ocean’s surface and underwater at the well head. A report released today by Earthjustice and Toxipedia Consulting Services presents a scientific literature review of chemical ingredients found in dispersants that were eligible for use at the time of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. And the results point to a toxic cocktail of oil and chemicals that threaten humans, wildlife and the environment.
The report, The Chaos of Clean-Up, comes as a result of Earthjustice’s advocacy and litigation, which led to the release of information detailing the chemical ingredients used in oil dispersants. Earthjustice attorney Marianne Engelman Lado, representing the Gulf Restoration Network and the Florida Wildlife Federation, challenged the Environmental Protection Agency in court to reveal all available health and toxicity information concerning oil dispersants. In response, the EPA released an aggregated list of the 57 ingredients eligible for use during oil spill cleanup operations, along with previously withheld health and safety information. The information can be viewed at a special Earthjustice webpage at earthjustice.org/features/the-chaos-of-clean-up.
Toxipedia’s scientific review demonstrates the wide range of potential impacts from exposure to the chemicals found in dispersants. From carcinogens, to endocrine disruptors, to chemicals that are toxic to aquatic organisms, some of the ingredients in oil dispersants are indeed potential hazards.
For instance, of the 57 ingredients: five chemicals are associated with cancer; 33 are associated with skin irritation from rashes to burns; 33 are linked to eye irritation; 11 are or are suspected of being potential respiratory toxins or irritants; 10 are suspected kidney toxins; eight are suspected or known to be toxic to aquatic organisms; and five are suspected to have a moderate acute toxicity to fish.
While revealing some of the potential hazards of dispersants, the report also highlights the lack of knowledge about dispersants and their impacts. Ultimately, the absence of thorough scientific research on dispersants, as well as the lack of public disclosure of each dispersant’s ingredients, hinder efforts to understand the full impacts of dispersant use.
This lack of knowledge is dangerous as the timing of another oil spill cannot be predicted. Dumping potentially toxic chemicals into the ocean without understanding the effects could result in significant harm to marine ecosystems, wildlife, and public health.
The report’s findings call for more research, greater disclosure of the information that is known, comprehensive toxicity testing, establishment of safety criteria for dispersants, and careful selection of the least toxic dispersants for application in oil spill response.
As oil companies continue to accelerate plans to drill in the Arctic and in the Gulf, detailed information about the effects of chemical oil dispersants are more important now than ever. Only with full knowledge about the chemicals being used can government and the public make informed decisions about how to respond to the next oil spill disaster.Secrecy around the ingredients of dispersants is just another example of how little we know about the chemicals being sold and used every day. Making sure that information about toxics is available is another powerful reason we need congress to pass the Safe Chemicals Act of 2011 that was introduced by Senator Lautenberg. When passed, this landmark legislation will create the foundation for a sound and comprehensive chemicals policy to protect both public health and the environment. Tell your senator now that we need to pass the Safe Chemicals Act of 2011.
Although your report is somewhat factual with regard to the amounts of dispersants used and the compounds used to make dispersants, you fail to ignore the letters from the FDA to congressman Markey and transcripts from the EPA concerning the health effects from dispersant use. You also tend to hype the effects of the constituents of the dispersant but fail to mention that the dispersant is a mixture of these compounds and a mixture has different effects on plants and animals. Much of the testing has been done and there are many studies and current data from the BP spill that refutes our hypothesis that these constituents are harmful to the ecosystem. Over 120,000 water samples were taken as a result of the spill but you failed to mention that work. You also fail to mention the oil spilled was more toxic than the dispersant used and that when mixed with the oil was no more toxic. In addition, you failed to mention many chemicals used everyday by individuals are much more toxic that the dispersant used during the spill, e.g., cosmetics, dawn dishwashing detergent...which by the way was used to clean the oil waterfowl.). You also fail to mention that dispersant is a first line oil spill defense to oil discharges in France and Britain and many other countries around the world. Of course it sounds to me that you are only for the environment when it suits your needs for instance... not much discussion about the trade offs of the use of dispersant, e.g, disperse the oil offshore vs. letting it impact sensitive shoreline ecosystems. You may want to get your facts straight before you put out this obviously one-sided and incomplete report. Please do your homework next time.
I heard that we could of used regular dish washing soap for the BP oil spill in the Gulf with the same effectiveness. Is that true?
There is not one person to blame in our government. The entire governing body in Washington DC is to blame. Republicans want to blame the Democrats when they hold the office of the presidency, and Democrats want to blame the Republicans when they hold the office.
When are the people of our country going to stand up, and realize none of the politicians care about the people. They only care about their pensions and their own health care (which they get for life).
It is time to start over. It may be a generalization, but the politicians are destroying our country. This was not written by a Democrat nor a Republican, but an American.
Hey President Obama,
This sounds just like your predecessor's move... is that office rubbing off on you?
Post new comment