Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

What Does Fracking Industry Have To Hide?


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Kathleen Sutcliffe:
News: Climate Impacts of Gas As Bad Or Worse Than Coal

Natural gas has been touted as a more responsible energy source than coal in the face of climate change, but a new study conducted by researchers at C...

by Kathleen Sutcliffe:
O Give Me A Home, Where The Skies Are…Oh Never Mind

Which has a worse smog problem ? The car-choked sprawling megalopolis of Los Angeles? Or the wide open plains of Wyoming? If you guessed LA, you&rsqu...

by Jillian Murphy:
Fracking Safeguard Bills Introduced

Over the past few decades—with the help of Congress—Big Oil and Gas successfully chipped away at our bedrock environmental laws, carving o...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Kathleen Sutcliffe's blog posts
11 May 2011, 1:38 PM
House committee hearing leaves this and many other questions unanswered

In a hearing on Capitol Hill today, Republican members of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee struggled to make the case against an investigation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency into the controversial gas drilling technique known as hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) - a process in which oil and gas companies blast millions of gallons of chemically treated water into the earth to extract the gas from underground deposits.

Considering the agency is already midway into its multi-year study, the move comes across as more than a little desperate. What is industry so scared of the American public finding out? If fracking isn’t dangerous, what does industry have to hide? And if fracking poses no threat to drinking water, why does industry need an exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act?

All good questions. But those weren’t the questions committee Republicans were asking.

Instead, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) yelled about why the agency was even doing the study. After leaving to get a burger, he came back and yelled some more. At one point he even seemed to suggest that the EPA study wasn’t needed because not enough people have died to warrant an investigation. Yikes.

One message came across loud and clear. The oil and gas industry is running scared. They sense the tide of public opinion turning ever more against them. Increasingly, it seems the only people willing to speak up for them are the ones they’ve bought off – a point Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC) proved perfectly when he forced the Republicans’ star witness Michael J. Economides to admit that the oil and gas industry pays him some $1 million a year (wonder how much of a bonus he got to sign his name to this glowing blog post in The Hill today?)

The hearing comes in the midst of yet another rough week for fracking boosters, both here and abroad. On Monday, Duke University researchers unveiled a peer-reviewed study to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that finds high methane levels in ground water near where fracking has occurred. And today, France’s conservative-controlled lower house of parliament took the first legislative step toward approving a nationwide ban on fracking.

The question those of us fighting for common-sense protections need to be asking ourselves is: what antics can we expect next from an industry ever more on the defensive and desperate to maintain their above-the-law status?
 

Can't help but notice that this article is more propaganda than fact and that you come off sounding hysterical.

Chemically treated water eh, you mean like tap water?

When you say that the representative was arguing against the study because not enough people have died you deliberately chose that phrasing over "because no people have died."

Do yourself a favor. Actually research the subject that you're arguing against so that your points aren't quite so easy to demolish and ignore. And, if you really want to protect the planet you might want to do a quick comparison of how this process compares to oil drilling, coal mining, tar sand extraction and a variety of other energy production procedures before running screaming for the hills like a Henny-Penny-luddite.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.