Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Proposal For Longview Coal Export Terminal Returns


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by David Lawlor:
Video: Coal Export Threatens The Northwest

Would you want to live next door to a coal export terminal? Wait, maybe that’s too vague of a question. Instead, let me ask you this… W...

by David Lawlor:
What It Means To Be A Resource Colony

(Editor's Note: This is the fourth blog post in an ongoing series about proposed coal export terminals in the Pacific Northwest. Upcoming blog posts w...

by David Lawlor:
Who likes coal dust? Pretty much nobody

(Editor's Note: This is the third blog in an ongoing series about proposed coal export terminals in the Pacific Northwest. Upcoming blogs will exa...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View David Lawlor's blog posts
28 February 2012, 10:37 AM
Columbia River facility would ship 44 million tons of coal annually

They’re baaack!

The shipping and logistics company Millennium Bulk Terminals last week filed applications for federal, state and county permits to build a coal export terminal in Longview, Wash. Last year, Millennium withdrew its permit applications to build a coal export facility in Longview after Earthjustice attorneys uncovered internal company memos discussing secret plans to exponentially expand the facility’s capacity once the terminal was constructed.

The uncovered memos left Millennium with a public relations black eye and resulted in the departure of the company’s chief executive officer. Millennium’s initial proposal publicly stated the terminal’s shipping capacity at 5 million tons per year, although the company’s internal documents revealed plans to expand the capacity to 60 million tons annually. Now, Millennium’s new project proposes shipping 44 million tons of coal annually to Asia via Longview.

The coal would be sourced from mines in Montana and Wyoming, and loaded onto trains to transport the coal to the proposed terminal on the Columbia River. The mile-long coal trains would employ uncovered boxcars, which allow coal dust to escape and pollute nearby communities along the rail route. Once the coal arrived at the Longview terminal, it would sit in enormous open-air piles. Winds would blow coal dust from the piles into the city of Longview, creating a public health hazard. Despite Millennium’s promise of mitigation efforts, coal dust pollution is a well-documented fact at existing coal export terminals around the globe.

Currently, only two coal export terminals operate on the western coast of the North American continent: one south of Vancouver, British Columbia and one in Seward, Alaska. But with the demand for coal growing in Asian nations, the industry is keenly interested in developing coastal terminals to move coal mined in Montana and Wyoming to countries such as China.

Earthjustice’s legal team is examining the new permit applications and studying Millennium’s proposal.

“We stand ready to protect the health and the quality of life of the residents of Longview,” said Earthjustice attorney Jan Hasselman. “A coal export facility in Longview would not only put the local community at risk, but also generate more greenhouse gas pollution in Asia, which leads to climate change.”

Before I commented on this I had to make a cpoule calls and talk to people that work at both Westshore and Neptune Terminals. The numbers your using are wrong, the 2009 numbers that your quoting was before both terminal expansions were finished. These two terminal expansions have increased tonnage by almost 10 million tons, and those increases are not for Canadian coal exports. Cloud Peak Energy is the only coal company exporting coal of any significants, there has been a few train loads over the last three years from Utah but most everything else has been shipped by Cloud Peak. Cloud Peak also signed a new contract that starts in 2013 that will be over twice that's currently being exported, (3.3 million tons for last year, and this year will be about 3.7 million). Also there talks with Teck Resources and one of the two east coast terminals to ship the European export coal there instead of Westshore or Neptune, that would free up another 2-5 million tons. I'll say this as politicaly correct as I can, cUZ coal is going to continue to be exported out of Canada, and that amount will at least triple in the next 18 months.

Finally, something to boost local jobs. I am all for it. High paying jobs for the railroad, dockworkers, and local builders. Stop standing in the way of progress. The coal will get to China in some other way, if not out of Longview.

We need jobs.

what a load of tosh... granted coal is not the cleanest - though I doubt that you'd stop the asian nations from burning it - if you dont supply - someone else will. China produces over 2BILLION METRIC TONS ( that's approx 2.5 BILLION SHORT ( NET) TONS) of Coal annually and its still not enough. As to coal dust / pollution - I would agree that it exist - however, in the western world where regualtions are imposed on storage - a simple thing as spraying the stock pile with good old H2O is sufficient to supress dust - other options employed is compacting the coal., building protection ( high fence) - all of these methods are open to application to reduce / prevent pollutions. Dont think that by stopping at longview those producers wont find another way out... where there is will - there will be a way - so better that you actually work with the industry to make a difference rather than postulate with hot air.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options