August 14, 2017
For decades, Tom Mangelsen has traveled the world documenting disappearing wildlife.
But at his home in Jackson, Wyoming, he has witnessed the reverse: the return of an icon of the wild. The survival of the Yellowstone grizzlies owes to protections brought by the Endangered Species Act—and to efforts by the American public who have fought for years for the species to retain those needed protections.
On Aug. 30, 2017, Earthjustice filed a lawsuit challenging an attempt by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to prematurely strip the grizzlies of their protections. The agency's decision, defying the best available science and sidestepping important legal safeguards, enables the states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming to move ahead with plans for trophy hunting of grizzlies.
Meanwhile, in the nation's capital, we are defending the Endangered Species Act itself from renewed efforts by politicians to dismantle the law that has succeeded in saving 99% of the species it protects.
“Before sunrise one morning in 2006, my yellow lab Loup started barking frantically at the foot of my bed.
“I saw this bear standing face-to-face with my dog, with only the glass between them.
“I realized that it was a grizzly bear.”
“It was just staring as my dog was dancing around, being frantic.
“And then the bear just walked off into the darkness.”
“Later on, my assistant and I went up to try and see the bear and, sure enough, the bear was eating a moose carcass at the Oxbow Bend in Grand Teton National Park.
“It was almost dark. I took a few pictures and thought, ‘That was really cool. Grizzly bears are returning to Teton Park after 50 years or more.’
“I didn’t expect to see her again.”
“About a year later, I heard there was a grizzly with three yearlings near the Oxbow.
“Researchers had collared and tagged the bear as ‘399.’
“We started taking pictures of her and her cubs, and watching and learning more about her.”
“Grizzly 399 has given this gift of educating people that bears are incredibly beautiful animals.
“They take care of their young. They play. They nurse. They show emotions.
“This bear and her cubs have given us insight—a lens into their lives.”
“I’ve seen 399 and 610—one of 399’s offspring—both lose their cubs and go absolutely crazy searching for them, frothing at the mouth and bawling, just like you would expect from a mother who loses her child at a Walmart.
“It’s that same kind of intelligence and emotions that these bears have.
“And we need to respect and honor that.”
A hunter claimed he poached and killed Grizzly 399 in the fall of 2015. After an agonizing wait, she emerged the following spring, safe and with a newborn, snow-faced cub by her side—her 16th descendant.
But if Endangered Species Act protections are removed, grizzly bears like 399 could be legally hunted once they cross over the invisible boundary lines of the park.
Earthjustice has worked for decades to safeguard the grizzlies from habitat destruction, excessive killing and other threats. The best available data indicates that their population has likely dipped in the last two years. The bears face the loss of two of its most important food sources—whitebark pine seeds and cutthroat trout—due to changing environmental conditions driven in part by our warming climate.
In the mid 2000s, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service began an effort to “delist” the grizzly from the Endangered Species Act, claiming the bears no longer needed protection. In doing so, the agency virtually ignored the threat posed by the dramatic die-off of whitebark pines.
But Earthjustice attorneys had been methodically documenting the decline of the trees and demonstrated the importance of this food source, using the government's own studies. The work successfully reoriented the legal argument to comport with biological facts.
The courts rejected that attempt to strip protections from the grizzlies, with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals admonishing that “the Service cannot take a full-speed ahead, damn-the-torpedoes approach to delisting—especially given the [Endangered Species Act]’s ‘policy of institutionalized caution.’"
This year, the Fish & Wildlife Service again moved to remove federal protections for grizzly bears in the Yellowstone region, in defiance of the best available science. On August 30, on behalf of Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Center for Biological Diversity, National Parks Conservation Association, and Sierra Club, Earthjustice filed a lawsuit in federal court to challenge the delisting decision. The legal challenge takes issue with the agency’s evaluation of the mortality consequences of the bears’ recent shift to a more heavily meat-based diet following the loss of other foods. It also faults the agency for surgically delisting the isolated Yellowstone grizzly population instead of focusing on a broader, more durable grizzly recovery in the West.
“With grizzly deaths spiking, now is not the time to declare the great bear recovered and federal protections unnecessary,” said Timothy Preso, managing attorney of Earthjustice's Northern Rockies Office.
“We should not be taking a gamble with the grizzly’s future.”
“The people who come to our parks have a right to see these bears to enjoy them and to have their kids learn something about wildlife.
“There’s a level of savviness and intelligence in bears that is pretty remarkable.”
“Grizzlies can co-exist peacefully with people.
“But we have to be tolerant ourselves, just as they are tolerant.”
“I will continue to fight for the bears and for justice in the wildlife management system.
“We need more advocates for wildness and animals like 399.”
Hello. My name is (my full name) from (my city and state) . I urge (my representative) to oppose five dangerous bills that attack the Endangered Species Act, peer-reviewed science, endangered species and the right of Americans to go to court to defend them: H.R. 424, H.R. 717, H.R. 1274, H.R. 2603 and H.R. 3131.
Among other things, these bills would strip protections for imperiled wolves in Wyoming and the upper Midwest and allow for wolf hunting in those states; cripple enforcement of illegal wildlife trafficking; stymie citizens’ ability to challenge illegal government actions in court; and allow regulators to accept any information that is presented by state, local or tribal governments as science—even if it doesn’t meet scientific standards of peer review.
Did you find this story informative?
Thank you for your feedback.
Please share this story for Grizzly 399 and the Endangered Species Act with your friends: