Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

NY and LA Times Call for Clean Air

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Sam Edmondson:
Clean Air Means Health, Jobs for Americans

EPA chief Lisa Jackson was on Capitol Hill today to testify before a subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. On topic was a bill from...

by Jared Saylor:
Arsenic-Flavored Baby Food?

House GOP members have been attacking clean air standards by pumping the stalled budget bill up with “riders” that remove the agency&rsquo...

by Sam Edmondson:
#Right2Breathe Recap: What Saved 160,000 Lives in 2010?

(Clean air is a life saver, which is why Earthjustice is working to ensure that polluters don’t stand in the way of safeguards against air pollu...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Sam Edmondson's blog posts
07 February 2011, 2:56 PM
Editorial pages make strong defense of clean air health protections

Over the weekend, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times both ran editorials in defense of clean air. Set against the increasing number of congressional maneuvers to stymie the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and its popular programs for clean air, it is refreshing to see two of the nation’s largest newspapers take a strong position in support of Americans’ right to breathe.

Among the EPA’s many important efforts to protect public health are limits on mercury and other toxic air pollutants from cement plants, industrial boilers and incinerators, and the worst of all mercury polluters, power plants. These health protections will save lives and money by making our air safer to breathe.

From the New York Times editorial:

The agency does have a heavy regulatory agenda. It will issue proposals not only on greenhouse gases but also ozone, sulfur dioxide and mercury, which poisons lakes and fish. These regulations are fully consistent with the Clean Air Act. Some of them should have been completed during the Bush years; all are essential to protect the environment. The agency’s administrator, Lisa Jackson, has moved cautiously, making clear that she will target only the largest polluters and not, as the Republicans claim, mom-and-pop businesses.

Such common sense arguments, however, are unlikely to resonate with a newly powerful faction within Congress that places the interests of dirty polluters over the health of their voting constituents. This faction’s desire to kneecap the EPA appears insatiable, not to mention out-of-touch with the wishes of the American public. Unsurprisingly, the core message of these crusaders is that the EPA’s health protections will lead to economic ruin. “But then, that’s nothing new,” said the Los Angeles Times:

EPA efforts under the Clean Air Act to mandate catalytic converters in cars, regulate smokestack emissions that produce acid rain or to phase out ozone-depleting chemicals have been met by predictions of economic catastrophe by conservatives and industry for 40 years. Instead, such actions have saved tens of thousands of lives, stopped the environmental devastation caused by acid rain and countered the ozone threat even as the nation's gross domestic product has grown to 14 times what it was in 1970.

The EPA’s current work to clean the air we all breathe will further this tradition of saving lives and money without causing the theoretical economic catastrophes that are the mantra of polluters and their congressional allies.

It is time to be brave and proceed toward a culture based on growth of quality rather than quantity. No one knows exactly how to go from an economy which is designed to grow faster and faster to infinity on a finite planet that is being destroyed by pollution, even so, if we don't learn a new way of life, soon, our children will not live to old age. Those who would doom life to extinction because pollution is really the underpinning of profit cry out against regulation of poisons they dump into the air and water, they say regulation of pollution is bad for business and will hurt people who need jobs.

It is time to face the fact that some people will never have enough; the more they have the more they want. Hosni Mubarak has squeezed 70 billion dollars out of his people and was busy stacking the deck so his son could take over and keep milking Egypt. Both Koch brothers increase in wealth after all expenses was 2.5 million dollars per hour last year, and they still don't have enough; they are working hard oppose regulation by the EPA with propaganda that confuses the citizens of America so much that the people work against their own best interests without even understanding it.

My project is Healing the Planet with Human Rights. I have developed the $5 per square foot house so everyone can have a home. The technique is yours anytime you want it, plus the flycatcher compost toilet, and water tanks that harvest hurricane rain to fill themselves.

Housing, sanitation and water from a technology that pays for itself so everyone may live in security with pride of place. With this it is possible to consider a twenty hour work week, suddenly there are plenty of jobs. Sound to good to be true? Healing the Planet with Human Rights, it's up to you.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.