Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

#Right2Breathe Recap: What Saved 160,000 Lives in 2010?


    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Sam Edmondson:
Clean Air Means Health, Jobs for Americans

EPA chief Lisa Jackson was on Capitol Hill today to testify before a subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. On topic was a bill from...

by Trip Van Noppen:
Life, Liberty and the Right to Breathe

Nobody gets through a day without breathing. Not executives in the coal-fired power and cement industries, which are polluting our air daily. Not the ...

by Sam Edmondson:
25,000 Lives Don't Matter Much to Them

Today, another indication comes that some members of Congress don't breathe the same air as their constituents. Politico is reporting (subs. req'd) th...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Sam Edmondson's blog posts
10 February 2011, 3:30 PM
The Clean Air Act, that's what

(Clean air is a life saver, which is why Earthjustice is working to ensure that polluters don’t stand in the way of safeguards against air pollution. Here’s a round up of some recent news in the ongoing campaign to protect our Right to Breathe.)

Use the #right2breathe hashtag on Twitter to track campaign updates.

EPA chief Lisa Jackson talks health on Capitol Hill
Tapped to testify on a bill that would shackle her agency and prevent it from doing its job to protect the American people, Lisa Jackson took an important message to Congress: Clean air saves lives and improves our health.

“Last year alone,” she said, “EPA’s implementation of the Clean Air Act saved more than 160,000 lives,” avoided 100,000 hospital visits and millions of respiratory illness cases, and kept Americans in work and at school. Clean air keeps us safe and healthy. Pro-polluter factions in Congress apparently think that isn’t a big deal, but I bet the 160,000 people whose lives were saved last year disagree.

American public wants EPA to do more, not less
A majority of Americans—63 percent, according to recent public opinion data—want the EPA “to do more to hold polluters accountable and protect the air and water.” That means actions such as reducing emissions of mercury, soot, benzene and other harmful pollutants from cement plants, industrial boilers and the juggernaut of all toxic polluters, coal-fired power plants. (On a side note, a new study from CERES and the Public Economy Research Institute at UMASS found that cleaning up dirty power plants could be a major boon for jobs and the U.S. economy.)

The aforementioned public opinion research also found that 77 percent of Americans want Congress to let the EPA do its job—which is to protect human health and the environment. Unsurprisingly, most Americans reject Newt Gingrich’s proposal to scrap the agency and replace it with an Environmental Solutions Agency. The takeaway? Americans to pro-polluter members of Congress: Out of the EPA’s way!

Texas mom tells Texas congressman: Hands off my clean air!
Alex Allred—board member at Downwinders at Risk, a Texas-based education and advocacy group, also an Earthjustice client—had a wonderful op-ed published last week in which she takes Rep. John Carter (R-TX) to task for trying to block air pollution standards that would improve air quality in Alex’s home of Midlothian, TX—and many other communities across the nation. Rep. Carter has no cement kilns in his district and never bothered to weigh in during a multi-year debate over new pollution limits for the dirty cement industry. Now, says Alex, “he wants to junk the whole thing just like that. That isn’t democracy. It’s usurpation. I fought hard to protect my family, congressman. Keep your hands off my Clean Air Act standards.”

Editorial boards defend clean air, public’s right to breathe
The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times ran editorials last weekend that defend the public’s right to breathe clean air. The pieces were a heartening reflection that the need for clean air is a visible, national issue. As the NY Times editorialized:

[The EPA] will issue proposals not only on greenhouse gases but also ozone, sulfur dioxide and mercury, which poisons lakes and fish. These regulations are fully consistent with the Clean Air Act. Some of them should have been completed during the Bush years; all are essential to protect the environment. The agency’s administrator, Lisa Jackson, has moved cautiously, making clear that she will target only the largest polluters and not, as the Republicans claim, mom-and-pop businesses.

What goes into the air is washed by rain into the water and then onto the land. Plants and farm animals absorb the water to live. When we eat vegetables and meats we are eating the air pollution concentrated by other life forms before it reaches our plate. A very large book would be needed to describe how many poisons are in the air we breath, the water we drink, and the food we eat. Beautiful new-born babies are polluted by poison pollution before they are born and breath their first breath. What kind of people are we that let this happen?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.