Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Notes From Under The Bus

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Liz Judge:
House Appropriators Slash Environmental, Health Safeguards

The 112th Session of the House of Representatives is at it again, doing what they do best: writing legislation to strike and block the clean air and c...

by Terry Winckler:
Massive Attacks on Environment Launched in Congress

Teabag by teabag, the anti-environment faction in the House of Representatives has filled its federal government spending bil...

by Maria Beloborodova:
The Top 10 unEarthed Stories of 2012

Blog posts about Earth's magnificent places and creatures were the most popular themes for unEarthed readers in 2012. By far the most-read post concer...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Ted Zukoski's blog posts
03 June 2011, 5:49 AM
Obama backtracks on broad environmental fronts
What happens when you get thrown under the bus.

Since the GOP won a majority in the House in 2010, the Obama administration has gone into "go-slow" mode - or even has taken a U-turn on presidential initiatives on air pollution and climate change.  The Los Angeles Times took aim at this in a tough May 20 editorial headlined: "In the 2012 campaign, environmentalists don't matter."  It opens:

Shortly after his party's "shellacking" in the midterm election, President Obama ordered government agencies to ensure that new regulations took economic growth into consideration and that old ones be revoked if they "stifle job creation or make our economy less competitive." Five months later, it's becoming pretty clear what he meant: The environment and public health will be thrown under a bus for the sake of his reelection in 2012.


And this hurts all the more because Earthjustice is feeling the tire marks.  Many of the issues on which the administration is attempting to appease polluters and House radicals are those we've worked on for years, including:

In the few weeks since the LA Times editorial, add another turn-around, this from Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.  Under pressure from Congress, he abandoned a policy - announced just last December -to inventory and consider protecting millions of acres of potential wilderness across the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM's) public lands.   

Never mind that the congressional funding limitation couldn't - and didn't - eliminate Salazar's duty under law to review and consider protecting these places.  

As New York Times reporter Felicity Barringer noted in a perceptive blog post, Salazar seemed to signal that he was going further than he had to to snuggle up to those in Congress who oppose the entire idea of wilderness.

In a perhaps unintentionally symbolic move, the day after backtracking on wilderness for public lands, BLM announced it planned to hand over 60 acres of federal public land to a Colorado town ... for a dump. 

So for public lands, it's no to wilderness, but yes to landfills.

Despite the setbacks, we'll crawl out from under this bus.  Our campaigns to protect clean air, mountain streams, public health and wilderness will keep the pressure on in the courts, in Congress, and with the Administration.  We just a have little more work to do, now.


Really good post!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.