Share this Post:

unEARTHED. The Earthjustice Blog

Farmworker Advocates Seek Stronger Pesticides Safeguard

    SIGN-UP for our latest news and action alerts:
   Please leave this field empty

Facebook Fans

Related Blog Entries

by Kristen Boyles:
AZM Reign of Poisoning Ends

Finally. Yesterday—Sept. 30—was the last day that the highly toxic pesticide AZM could be used in the United States. This pesticide, origi...

by Andrea Delgado:
EPA to Farmworkers: Ask the Boss to Show You the Papers

After more than two decades, the Environmental Protection Agency announced revisions to the Agricultural Worker Protection Standard, an outdated stand...

by Raviya Ismail:
Thanksgiving: A Time to Consider Our Food Harvesters

Today, a coalition of farmworker supporters launched a new website,, to generate awareness of the biggest hazards farmworkers f...

Earthjustice on Twitter

View Raviya Ismail's blog posts
20 February 2014, 11:00 AM
EPA announces rulemaking for Worker Protection Standard
Letitia Vargas, Mario Vargas and Myra Vargas (from left) walk to a meeting in the Hart Senate Office Building in July of 2013. Myra Vargas is speaking to Alexis Guild, Farmworker Justice's Migrant Health Policy Analyst. (Photo by Matt Roth / Earthjustice)

When Mario Vargas showed up at the Washington, D.C., offices of representatives from his home state of Ohio in July, he shared stories from farmworkers who are getting sick from pesticides. Joined by his daughter and girlfriend, they made the rounds talking about how it feels to inhale pesticides while pregnant, how farmworkers don’t know what their basic rights are, and how many workers are afraid to tell the truth about what is really going on in the fields.

Today Vargas, 44, and other farmworker advocates cheered the news that the weak and outdated Worker Protection Standard, which sets agricultural worker safety standards for pesticide use, will finally be updated. The Environmental Protection Agency announced that the new proposal will enter the Federal Register in early March, which is when public comment officially begins.

Vargas, who began working in the fields at 11, said:

As a former farmworker who worked up the ladder to become a supervisor, I’ve seen all sides of the issue. If farmworkers must work with pesticides, then protections must be strengthened so farmworkers know their rights, take necessary precautions and are treated with dignity and respect.

Vargas was not the only farmworker advocate who cheered the news.

Selena Zelaya, with her father. (Photo by Matt Roth / Earthjustice)
Selena Zelaya, with her father Miguel, in Washington, D.C. (Matt Roth / Earthjustice)

Among those who came to Capitol Hill to lobby for protections was Selena Zelaya, 18, a freshman at Seminal State College in Florida. She took time off from her busy schedule to visit the Hill twice, where she spoke to Florida congressional officers with her father Miguel about the harm her parents face from working as farmworkers.

Zelaya said the announcement was “great news” but cautioned that “any revisions or updates must be strong enough to protect farm workers." She continued:

It is important because many farm workers are being exposed to things they don't even know about and in some cases they don't see the importance of protections because they are not being trained every year. It means so much to my parents being farm workers for many years and having pesticides affect our family directly.

Why does this issue matter? Because an estimated 1.1 billion pounds of pesticides are applied to crops annually in the United States. Our nation’s estimated 2.4 million farmworkers form the backbone of the U.S. agricultural economy and face the greatest threat from the health impacts of these chemicals.

The federal government estimates that there are 10,000–20,000 acute pesticide poisonings among workers in the agricultural industry annually, a figure that likely understates the actual number of acute poisonings since many affected farmworkers may not seek care from a physician. Short-term effects of pesticide exposures can include skin and eye injuries, nausea, headaches, respiratory problems and even death. Long-term exposure on the job can increase the risk of serious chronic health problems such as cancer, birth defects, neurological impairments and Parkinson’s disease for farmworkers, their families, and their children.

The WPS was designed with adult workers in mind, but agriculture is different from most other industries in that it allows children to join labor crews at 12-years-old—even at 10 in some crops—and these children are exposed to pesticides on the job.

Yesenia and Neftali Cuello.
Yesenia and Neftali Cuello in Washington, D.C.

Yesenia and Neftali Cuello were just 14 and 12 when they began working on tobacco and sweet potato farms in North Carolina. They visited Capitol Hill to tell their story and are elated the WPS is going to be updated.

“We never heard the word ‘pesticide’ or had a safety training until 4 years later,” says Yesenia, now 20 and no longer working in the fields. “I assumed it was some kind of fertilizer.”

Vargas, who worked in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana and Michigan as a farmworker, would do the job again but feels better protections are needed.

“I think farmworkers are the hardest workers in the country,” Vargas said. “They need to know what their rights are and they need to be educated.”

As best man at Joe Fontaine's wedding, I had been introduced to hiking in Mineral King. It was not compelling to me as a park. But in the law suit against Disney judges then enabled lawyers for advocacy groups to get a nice return. Later suing government agencies was similar. Tax payers spend plenty for this gift to advocacy groups. Obviously there is "some" positive return to Americans.
Now litigation is used mostly to stop many projects, along with providing return to Sierra Club and the scores of other advocacy groups. They get acceptance from folks in the government. A bad type of collusion to have in a democracy. Going forward I see no sign of it abating and no sign of an abating of the urban experts on environmental matters. They are a gimme group like most in the USA. Most gains are to young folks; older people have nearly no access.
I find the increasing mitigatory climate repugnant. It stems from Obama down to local levels. The poor and the hungry get food stamps but little else, due in large part to it. Food production has no opportunity due to Earthjustice trauma to the small agricultural voter component of the USA. I guess the real problem, population, will be reduced soon on the Planet due to malnutrition and hunger and concurrent violence. There may be a better way.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <p> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.