Saving The Forest For The Trees
Tongass National Forest is home to centuries-old trees and rivers flowing through thousands of islands. It also was the final forest in the fight to keep timber sales out of roadless areas.
As a four-seater Cessna glides over Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, Earthjustice attorney Tom Waldo looks out the window at its majestic emerald green and deep blue landscape.
The Tongass—America’s largest and wildest national forest—is filled with centuries-old towering trees, ice fields and glaciers, and rivers and fjords flowing among thousands of islands.
Like most wild places in America, though, the Tongass is not without its scars. Decades after timber companies razed the forest’s biggest, oldest trees, parts of it are still covered in small, uniform evergreens, mere remnants of their majestic ancestors.
“It’s sobering,” says Waldo. “Seeing big expanses of clear-cuts makes it hard to feel celebratory about what we’ve done. You see what has been lost, and you realize the importance of protecting the remaining areas.”
But Waldo’s work, is worth celebrating.
You Can Help Save The Tongass' Remaining Old-Growth Trees Earthjustice is fighting in court to stop the U.S. Forest Service’s Big Thorne timber sale. It is outside of the protected roadless areas—and would be the largest old-growth clearcutting project in the Tongass in more than two decades.
A Moral—And Legal—Obligation
Together with a team of fellow Earthjustice attorneys and a variety of clients, Waldo has spent the last 25 years protecting this old-growth forest from the joined efforts of government and industry to prop up an unsustainable, money-losing logging program that takes no heed of its damaging consequences. He has kept roadless areas intact, saving the last remaining habitat for wildlife species that struggle to survive in the old-growth forest that remains.
Most importantly, he has helped to protect a resource that many people depend on—from Alaska Natives and commercial fishermen to tourism operators and others whose lifestyle and culture are intimately tied to nature.
But there’s still more work to do. In just a few weeks, Waldo will go before a Court of Appeals to argue, once again, that protecting the Tongass is not only a moral obligation, it’s a legal one.
Editor's Note: Since the publication of this story, Waldo presented oral arguments before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court issued its ruling on July 29, 2015, finding that the exemption of the Tongass from the Roadless Rule was illegal. And in March, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a last-ditch effort by the State of Alaska to overturn the protections.
When he first moved to Alaska, Waldo didn’t intend to make the Tongass the subject of his life’s work. “Actually, when I went to law school at Stanford, I didn’t know what I wanted to do,” he says. “But I joined the Environmental Law Society, and that was interesting to me.”
After law school and a Fulbright scholarship in Finland, Waldo secured a job clerking for the chief justice of the Alaska Supreme Court in Fairbanks. He and his wife Anitra thought that they were going to have a one-year adventure in Alaska and then return to Minnesota, but they quickly fell in love with the grandeur of the landscape.
“I didn’t really know what to expect from Alaska. But the skiing and hiking, kayaking and camping … we just loved the wilderness, and we wanted to stay,” says Waldo. “It’s still the reason I live in Alaska.”
As his clerkship ended, Waldo sent résumés to Alaska law firms, but received no offers. He and Anitra returned to Minnesota with their new Alaska-born baby, where Waldo worked for a year in the Minnesota Attorney General’s office. But they wouldn’t live away from Alaska for long.
In 1989, the Exxon Valdez oil tanker ran aground in Prince William Sound, spilling 11 million gallons of crude oil. Earthjustice sued Exxon and asked Waldo to help. He jumped at the chance to join Earthjustice’s Juneau office, located right in the middle of the Tongass.
Eventually, the Waldos found a house on a hill. From their back door, the forest climbs steeply up a mountain, which gives way to an ice field reaching 35 miles to the Canadian border. From the front, they have a view of the mountains on Douglas Island and the channel between the island and Juneau. They see deer and bears in the yard frequently and bald eagles every day. He couldn’t believe his good fortune.
“While our kids were growing up, we spent a lot of time together in the forests and on the trails, ski slopes, and waters around Juneau,” says Waldo. “It gave me a sense of responsibility for the next generation.”
A More Holistic Solution: Roadless
Just months after moving to Juneau, Waldo got his chance to protect the landscape he adored. In what would be the first of many Tongass-related cases, Waldo and the other Earthjustice lawyers in Juneau challenged the Forest Service’s five-year plan for a massive logging program that would clear-cut wildlife habitat and decrease food sources for subsistence hunters.
In the ensuing years, one by one, Waldo beat back attempts to log the biggest trees and best wildlife habitat, but for every tree he helped save, another was threatened. Earthjustice and other environmental organizations faced this situation around the country. Nationwide, hundreds of thousands of miles of logging roads in the national forests were fragmenting habitat and destroying wilderness.
What is Roadless? Covering about a third of our national forests, the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule protects “large, relatively undisturbed landscapes” from damaging new roads and clear-cuts in intact forests. Other economic development, including tourism projects, is permitted. The protected areas provide vital habitat for 1,500 wildlife species—and drinking water supplies for 60 million Americans.
Years of litigation and advocacy finally yielded a more holistic solution. In 2001, the Clinton Administration adopted the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, which generally prohibits logging and road construction in roadless areas of the national forests.
But the celebration didn’t last for long. State governments and industry interests contested the rule immediately after its passage. The Bush Administration, for its part, failed to mount an adequate defense. Eventually, it attempted—unsuccessfully—to repeal the rule. Over the next decade, Earthjustice successfully fought back against these challenges—and against attempts to sell roadless forests for timber.
“Our single area of greatest litigation success has been roadless area protection,” Waldo says. “The Bush Administration aggressively tried to push through a slew of new timber sales in Tongass roadless areas, but they cut corners and we stopped them at every turn.”
The Fight Continued
Today, the Tongass remains the one forest where the fight continues to keep timber sales out of roadless areas.
When Alaska first challenged the Roadless Rule in court, the Bush Administration settled the case in 2003 by exempting the Tongass from the rule’s protections. Initially, the Bush Administration called the exemption “temporary.” After several years, though, it became clear the exemption was permanent. Waldo and his co-counsel from the Natural Resources Defense Council challenged the Tongass exemption in 2009 and won. But the state of Alaska appealed and, this past March, a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed by a 2–1 vote, once again exempting the Tongass from the Roadless Rule’s protection.
Only one option remained: to ask for an en banc hearing at the Ninth Circuit, whereby an expanded 11-judge panel would re-hear the case. Every year, the Ninth Circuit receives about 1,000 petitions for en banc hearings and only grants about 20, so Waldo knew it was a long shot.
“But after defending the Tongass for 25 years and the Roadless Rule for 14, we had to try,” he says.
In late August, the Ninth Circuit granted Waldo’s petition, and so on December 16, 2014, Waldo once more argued the merits of the case for protecting the Tongass.
The effects of a victory will be long lasting: Any new logging on the Tongass will be limited to areas that already have roads and old clear-cuts. Pristine parts of the forest will remain untouched. Threatened and endangered wildlife will be guaranteed a chance at recovery. And Tom Waldo can stop fighting individual timber sales on roadless forest.
“We have an incredible opportunity for environmental success right now,” he explains. “At last, we can secure roadless protections for the Tongass once and for all.”
Ending Old-Growth Logging
A win at this level wouldn’t end the battle to protect the entire Tongass, though. The U.S. Forest Service will continue supporting old-growth logging on parts of the forest that already have roads, and Waldo will continue fighting to protect wildlife that need old-growth forest to survive. (Find out how you can help end industrial-scale old-growth logging in the Tongass.)
This is where Waldo sees a second opportunity for enormous environmental success. Currently, the Forest Service is amending the Tongass Land Management Plan, which includes a proposal to transition the logging program from old-growth to second-growth trees in 10 to 15 years.
“But wildlife on the Tongass just can’t take another 10 years of old-growth logging,” says Waldo. “In parts of the forest, some species need all the old-growth that remains just to survive.”
That’s why Earthjustice lawyers in Alaska are pushing the Forest Service to phase its timber program out of old-growth logging as fast as possible.
The logging program is also a money loser, to the tune of $20 million per year, and it only supports about a hundred jobs.
In contrast, the tourism, recreation and fishing industries in Southeast Alaska, which depend on a vibrant Tongass ecosystem, are the economic powerhouses in the region, supporting thousands. So, for the sake of few jobs, the federal government subsidizes the timber industry despite the costs to the environment, to the rest of the regional economy, or to the American taxpayer.
“At $20 million a year, it would be cheaper to write checks to a hundred mill workers for a year’s pay,” says Waldo.
A Rare Legacy for Future Generations
Twenty-five years ago, it was impossible to convince the Forest Service that it shouldn’t support logging. Back then, every new sale meant new roads were built, and only the places with the biggest trees were logged.
But today, in part thanks to Earthjustice’s work, public opinion about logging, especially old-growth logging, has shifted dramatically.
“As we fought back, we helped create a roadless brand,” says Waldo. “Now, the idea of logging roadless areas is toxic to many people who realize how destructive it is, and how unacceptable to a large population.”
Similarly, a transition away from old-growth logging is not a matter of if, but when.
Today, only fragments remain in much of the world’s original forests. But in the Tongass, where vast tracts of primeval forests still exist, and all of the original wildlife species are still present, time is of the essence to quickly end large-scale old-growth logging.
“That is a rare legacy we can still leave to future generations,” says Waldo.
Epilogue: On July 29, 2015, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Bush-era action exempting the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule was invalid.
The decision ensures that the roadless portions of the Tongass—the largest and wildest national forest in the U.S.—will be protected from new road-building and logging. It was an important decision that affirmed a vital principle: Even when an administration changes, agencies cannot arbitrarily change policies. (More details.)
And on March 28, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a last-ditch effort by the State of Alaska to exempt the Tongass from the Roadless Rule. (More details.)