A coalition of conservation groups joined forces today to put the brakes on Bush-era regulations and land management plans to fast-track development of oil shale, a dirty fossil fuel that threatens water resources, communities and wildlife in the West. Oil shale development would also contribute to climate change.
The groups filed two suits in U.S. District Court for Colorado alleging that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) under the Bush administration violated the National Environmental Policy Act in drafting regulations for a commercial oil shale program without, by their own admission, having sufficient information on the environmental impacts. The suits also charge that the BLM broke the law by amending 10 management plans in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to allow oil shale and tar sands development on more than two million acres of land without giving the public a chance to administratively appeal, or "protest," the decision. Furthermore, the Bush administration failed to ensure that taxpayers receive a fair return from oil shale lease royalties, in violation of the Federal Lands Policy Management Act and the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
"The BLM -- in its stampede to beat the clock before the inauguration -- is threatening wildlife, water and wilderness by opening up millions of acres of public land to destructive, unproven oil shale and tar sands development," said Earthjustice attorney Ted Zukoski, one of the attorneys who filed today's suits on behalf of the groups. "In this mad rush, public rights have been trampled and private interests rewarded."
"The oil shale regulations do not ensure a fair rate of return to federal taxpayers," said Karin P. Sheldon, Western Resource Advocates' executive director. "Nor do the regulations protect communities, western water or the environment. With low royalty rates and broad consequences for our climate, the leasing rules would subsidize global warming."
The opportunity to impose lease rules arrived last October when a spending limitation enacted by Congress to give the oil shale industry more time to conduct research and development expired.
Attempts worldwide to develop commercial-scale oil shale operations capable of producing significant amounts of transportation fuel have failed, with the most recent Colony Oil Shale project in Colorado crashing disastrously on "Black Sunday" of May 2, 1982, putting more than 2,000 people out of work in a day.
"Bush's BLM shortchanged the people of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, putting politics ahead of good governance," said Dave Alberswerth, senior energy policy advisor with The Wilderness Society. "Unfortunately, proposing this fuel whose time may never come as national energy policy perpetrates a cruel hoax on Americans suffering due to hard economic times. We can't even harvest oil from shale and, even if we could, the environmental consequences would be disastrous."
Producing a liquid fuel from oil shale entails heating solid rock to temperatures in excess of 600°F to liquefy the kerogen inside for conversion into synthetic petroleum fuels. Because of the large amounts of energy needed to heat and process oil shale, as many as 10 new coal power plants might be needed in the West, leading to increased emissions of greenhouse gasses that contribute to climate change.
Availability of water to produce oil shale is also an issue. The BLM estimates that in Colorado alone, oil shale could even consume more water than the Denver Metro area, home to over 2 million people.
"Oil shale threatens to destroy wildlife and fish habitat, poison our air and water, and dry up rivers in the West," said Sierra Club executive director Carl Pope. "This is one of the dirtiest and most wasteful forms of energy in the world. We need energy policy that's based on sound science. Such policy would not fast-track development of untested and dangerous fuels like oil shale."
Through its own research, the coalition has concluded that oil shale will bring neither energy independence nor lower gas prices, but will hasten global warming pollution.
"The BLM admits it is entering the land of the unknown, practically giving the public's land away to promote dirty energy production" says Melissa Thrailkill, staff attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity. "The Bush administration's refusal to follow the law in issuing these final regulations is evidence of its intent, even in its final days, to ignore and politicize science in order to cater to big oil's desires," said Thrailkill.
On January 6, the coalition also sent notice of their intent to sue the Bush administration for violations of the Endangered Species Act. If the government does not respond to those allegations within 60 days, the claims will be added to the suit filed today. Craig Thompson, chair-elect of the National Wildlife Federation board of directors and a former oil shale worker states, "The rush for oil shale development will bring an impoverished landscape in which scarce water and stressed wildlife are pushed past the brink," adding, "Why the rush now, despite objections from Governors Freudenthal and Ritter, along with Senators Ken Salazar and Mark Udall?"
The Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Center for Biological Diversity Colorado Environmental Coalition, Defenders of Wildlife, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Red Rock Forests, Sierra Club, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Western Colorado Congress, Western Resource Advocates, The Wilderness Society and Wilderness Workshop filed the suits.
Ted Zukoski, Earthjustice, (303) 996-9622